Download Free The Long Term Effect Of Sarbanes Oxley On Cross Listing Premia Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online The Long Term Effect Of Sarbanes Oxley On Cross Listing Premia and write the review.

This paper uses a triple difference approach to assess whether the adoption of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act predicts long-term changes in cross-listing premia of affected foreign firms. I measure cross-listing premia as the difference between the Tobin's q of a cross-listed company and a non-cross-listed company from the same country matched on propensity to cross-list (first difference). I find that average premia for firms cross-listed on levels 2 or 3 (subject to SOX) declined in the year of SOX adoption (2002) and remained significantly below their pre-SOX level through year-end 2005 (second difference). Firms listed on levels 2 or 3 experienced larger declines in premia than firms listed on levels 1 or 4, which are not subject to SOX (third difference). At the same time, the 2002 decline overpredicts the long-term change in premia. Roughly 30-35% of the firm-level change in premium during 2002 reversed during 2003; firms with larger 2002 declines had larger increases in 2003. Riskier firms and firms from high-disclosing countries suffered larger post-SOX declines. Firm size predicts larger (smaller) declines in premia in poorly (well) governed countries. Faster growing firms in poorly (well) governed countries experienced smaller (larger) declines in premia. The results are robust to the use of different before-and-after periods; the use of annual, quarterly, or monthly data; and different regression specifications. The overall evidence is consistent with the view that SOX negatively affected cross-listed premia, and particularly hurt riskier firms and firms from well-governed countries, while perhaps helping high-growth firms from poorly-governed countries.
I examine the short- and long-term impact of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) on cross-listed foreign private issuers. Both short- and long-term test results suggest that the costs of SOX compliance significantly exceed its benefits and reduce the net benefits of cross-listings.
Using a sample of newly initiated American Depository Receipt (ADR) programs over the period 2000 and 2004, this paper examines the effect of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) on the cross-listing decision and the value consequences of cross-listing by foreign firms. We find that the passage of SOX did not significantly lower the propensity of foreign firms to cross-list their shares on U.S. financial markets. However, we show that the adoption of SOX: (i) increased (decreased) the likelihood of cross-listing by firms from countries with civil (common) law legal systems; (ii) induced firms from civil (common) law countries to cross-list their shares primarily on the OTC (exchange); and (iii) raised the value of cross-listing on the OTC making its difference from exchange market listing insignificant. Our results suggest that post-SOX, foreign firms from common law countries sought functional convergence through legal bonding by cross-listing on an exchange but were deterred by the mandated corporate restructuring as well as legal and administrative costs associated with SOX compliance and elected to cross-list in alternative global financial market venues instead. For foreign firms from civil law countries for whom functional convergence with U.S. financial markets through reputational bonding was sufficient, the strengthened corporate governance environment from SOX encouraged cross-listing on the OTC.
Following the recent financial crisis, regulators have been preoccupied with the concept of systemic risk in financial markets, believing that such risk could cause the markets that they oversee to implode. At the same time, they have demonstrated a certain inability to develop and implement comprehensive policies to address systemic risk. This inability is due not only to the indeterminacy inherent in the term 'systemic risk' but also to existing institutional structures which, because of their existing legal mandates, ultimately make it difficult to monitor and regulate systemic risk across an entire economic system. Bringing together leading figures in the field of financial regulation, this collection of essays explores the related concepts of systemic risk and institutional design of financial markets, responding to a number of questions: In terms of systemic risk, what precisely is the problem and what can be done about it? How should systemic risk be regulated? What should be the role of the central bank, banking authorities, and securities regulators? Should countries implement a macroprudential regulator? If not, how is macroprudential regulation to be addressed within their respective legislative schemes? What policy mechanisms can be employed when developing regulation relating to financial markets? A significant and timely examination of one of the most intractable challenges posed to financial regulation.
Understanding the current state of affairs and tools available in the study of international finance is increasingly important as few areas in finance can be divorced completely from international issues. International Finance reflects the new diversity of interest in international finance by bringing together a set of chapters that summarizes and synthesizes developments to date in the many and varied areas that are now viewed as having international content. The book attempts to differentiate between what is known, what is believed, and what is still being debated about international finance. The survey nature of this book involves tradeoffs that inevitably had to be made in the process given the vast footprint that constitutes international finance. No single book can cover everything. This book, however, tries to maintain a balance between the micro and macro aspects of international finance. Although each chapter is self-contained, the chapters form a logical whole that follows a logical sequence. The book is organized into five broad categories of interest: (1) exchange rates and risk management, (2) international financial markets and institutions, (3) international investing, (4) international financial management, and (5) special topics. The chapters cover market integration, financial crisis, and the links between financial markets and development in some detail as they relate to these areas. In each instance, the contributors to this book discuss developments in the field to date and explain the importance of each area to finance as a field of study. Consequently, the strategic focus of the book is both broad and narrow, depending on the reader's needs. The entire book provides a broad picture of the current state of international finance, but a reader with more focused interests will find individual chapters illuminating on specific topics.
This paper uses a natural experiment to measure market response to the adoption of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). Because SOX applies to all US public companies, US-based studies have difficulty separating the effects of contemporaneous events. However, controlled analysis is available: SOX applies to some cross-listed firms (those listed on level 2 or 3), but not to others (listed on level 1 or 4). By comparing reactions of SOX-exposed foreign firms to reactions of otherwise similar SOX-unexposed foreign firms, we can test investor beliefs about the costs and benefits of SOX in a way that is not cleanly available for U.S.-based studies. We find that stock prices of foreign firms subject to SOX declined (increased) significantly, compared to cross-listed firms not subject to SOX and to non-cross-listed firms, during key announcements indicating that the Act would (would not) fully apply to cross-listed issuers. In cross-sectional tests, high-disclosing firms and firms from high-disclosing countries experienced the strongest declines, while faster-growing companies experienced weaker declines. This evidence is consistent with the view that investors expected the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to have a net negative effect on cross-listed foreign companies, with high-disclosing companies suffering larger net costs, and faster-growing companies from poorly-governed countries suffering smaller costs.In two related papers, lt;a href=rdquo;http://ssrn.com/abstract=959022rdquo;gt;http://ssrn.com/abstract=959022lt;/agt; and lt;a href=rdquo;http://ssrn.com/abstract=994583rdquo;gt; http://ssrn.com/abstract=994583lt;/agt;, I study changes in cross-listing premia during 2002 (the year when SOX was adopted), and between 2002 and 2005. In both, I find that the premia for level-23 cross-listed companies declined relative to level-14 cross-listed companies and non-cross-listed companies, consistent with this event study.
I discuss the analysis in Piotroski and Srinivasan (2008) and how it helps to disentangle the effects of Sarbanes Oxley on observed listing patterns. Since the paper is quite thorough and reflects the comments from many workshop participants, I focus on broader issues. Further, I attempt to incorporate the gist of comments from the Journal of Accounting Research conference participants. I conclude that, while the paper provides important descriptive evidence, inherent design and measurement hurdles limit one's ability to draw strong causal inferences about the effects of SOX on cross listing decisions.
This paper presents empirical evidence on the effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on the value of firms and on the cross-listing choice of firms destined to three major markets in North America, Asia and Europe. We use dynamic panel data methods and treatment effects methods to find that Sarbanes-Oxley has had a negative impact on the value of firms worldwide. Our evidence indicates that Sox may have segmented markets, with fewer and more valuable firms seeking the more stringent US market; but many more lower valued firms destined to Hong Kong and Germany seeking potential signaling benefits of crosslisting.
Analyzing the role companies can play in tackling climate change, this book shows how they can set up effective environmental, social, and governance (ESG) frameworks and draft resilient strategies for sustainable activities and investment. It assesses the issue of climate justice, considers the impact of “greenwashing”, and looks at ways investors can evaluate ESG considerations. It outlines the corporate and economic risks of climate change alongside the response from central banks. It shows that policy guidance, increased transparency, and information sharing is central for the private sector to make progress towards tackling climate change while protecting its business interests.