Download Free Publications Of The European Court Of Human Rights Series A Judgments And Decisions Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Publications Of The European Court Of Human Rights Series A Judgments And Decisions and write the review.

The European Court of Human Rights is an international court based in Strasbourg and part of the Council of Europe. It rules on individual or inter-State applications alleging violations of the rights and freedoms set out in the European Convention on Human Rights by any of the Council's 47 member States. The Court's case-law makes the Convention a powerful living instrument for consolidating the rule of law and democracy in Europe. The Reports of Judgments and Decisions is the official series of leading cases selected by the most senior judges at the Court because of their high jurisprudential interest. Each judgment and decision is published in English and French and is preceded by a summary - including case description, keywords and key notions - for ease of reference. The Reports are primarily designed for legal professionals, libraries and academics and complement the case-law information available on the Court's website (www.echr.coe.int). (Series: Reports of Judgments and Decisions / Recueil des arrets et decisions) [Subject: European Law, Human Rights Law]
The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary is the first complete article-by-article commentary on the ECHR and its Protocols in English. This book provides an entry point for every part of the Convention: the substance of the rights, the workings of the Court, and the enforcement of its judgments. A separate chapter is devoted to each distinct provision or article of the Convention as well as to Protocols 1, 4, 6, 7, 12, 13, and 16, which have not been incorporated in the Convention itself and remain applicable to present law. Each chapter contains: a short introduction placing the provision within the context of international human rights law more generally; a review of the drafting history or preparatory work of the provision; a discussion of the interpretation of the text and the legal issues, with references to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Commission on Human Rights; and a selective bibliography on the provision. Through a thorough review of the ECHR this commentary is both exhaustive and concise. It is an accessible resource that is ideal for lawyers, students, journalists, and others with an interest in the world's most successful human rights regime.
The European Court of Human Rights is an international court based in Strasbourg and is part of the Council of Europe. The Court rules on individual or inter-State applications alleging violations of the rights and freedoms set out in the European Convention on Human Rights by any of the Council's 47 Member States. The Court's case-law makes the Convention a powerful living instrument for consolidating the rule of law and democracy in Europe. Reports of Judgments and Decisions is the official series of leading cases selected by the most senior judges at the Court because of their high jurisprudential interest. Each judgment and decision is published in English and French and is preceded by a summary - including case description, keywords, and key notions - for ease of reference. The Reports are primarily designed for legal professionals, libraries, and academics. Wolf Legal Publishers is proud to present the Reports of Judgments and Decisions series, formerly published by Carl Heymanns Verlag. Each volume contains a series of cases or extracts of cases, preceded by a summary prepared by the Registry. Each summary contains a case description, keywords, and key notions, in addition to the facts of the case and the Court's main findings. Cases will continue to be presented in five or six volumes published every year, accompanied by an index listing them, both alphabetically (by applicant and by respondent State) and analytically (by Article(s) of the European Convention on Human Rights). *** Volume 2010-II contains the following select reports/cases: Grosaru c. Romania * Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom * Orsus and Others v. Croatia * Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom. (Series: Reports of Judgments and Decisions) [Subject: European Law, Human Rights Law]
The European Court of Human Rights is an international court based in Strasbourg and is part of the Council of Europe. The Court rules on individual or inter-State applications alleging violations of the rights and freedoms set out in the European Convention on Human Rights by any of the Council's 47 Member States. The Court's case-law makes the Convention a powerful living instrument for consolidating the rule of law and democracy in Europe. "Reports of Judgments and Decisions" is the official series of leading cases selected by the most senior judges at the Court because of their high jurisprudential interest. Each judgment and decision is published in English and French and is preceded by a summary - including case description, keywords, and key notions - for ease of reference. The Reports are primarily designed for legal professionals, libraries, and academics. The European Court of Human Rights and Wolf Legal Publishers are proud to present the "Reports of Judgments and Decisions" series, formerly published by Carl Heymanns Verlag. Each volume contains a series of cases or extracts of cases, preceded by a summary prepared by the Registry. Each summary contains a case description, keywords, and key notions, in addition to the facts of the case and the Court's main findings. Cases will continue to be presented in five or six volumes published every year, accompanied by an index listing them, both alphabetically (by applicant and by respondent State) and analytically (by Article(s) of the European Convention on Human Rights). *** The 2008 Index is a companion volume to the five individual volumes of the select reports/cases collected for the year 2008. (Series: Reports of Judgments and Decisions)
This insightful book considers how the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is faced with numerous challenges which emanate from authoritarian and populist tendencies arising across its member states. It argues that it is now time to reassess how the ECHR responds to such challenges to the protection of human rights in the light of its historical origins.
An important provision of the European Convention on Human Rights is that in the event of a violation being found, not only is the state in question required to redress the consequences of the violation vis-á-vis the applicant - by such means as reopening of proceedings at the origin of the violation, reversal of a judicial verdict, discontinuation of expulsion proceedings or, where necessary, payment of a monetary award to the applicant; but it must also take general measures to prevent the repetition of the violation. These latter measures may take the form, for example, of a change in legislation, recognition of the Court's judgment in national case-law, the appointment of extra judges or magistrates to absorb a backlog of cases, the construction of detention centres suitable for juvenile delinquents, the introduction of training for the police, or other similar steps. This second edition continues to examine both individual measures and general measures taken by states in accordance with the Court's judgments and with the supervisory proceedings of the Committee of Ministers, as published in its human rights (DH) resolutions.
Confusion about the differences between the Council of Europe (the parent body of the European Court of Human Rights) and the European Union is commonplace amongst the general public. It even affects some lawyers, jurists, social scientists and students. This book will enable the reader to distinguish clearly between those human rights norms which originate in the Council of Europe and those which derive from the EU, vital for anyone interested in human rights in Europe and in the UK as it prepares to leave the EU. The main achievements of relevant institutions include securing minimum standards across the continent as they deal with increasing expansion, complexity, multidimensionality, and interpenetration of their human rights activities. The authors also identify the central challenges, particularly for the UK in the post-Brexit era, where the components of each system need to be carefully distinguished and disentangled.
Through redrafting the judgments of the ECHR, Diversity and European Human Rights demonstrates how the court could improve the mainstreaming of diversity in its judgments. Eighteen judgments are considered and rewritten to reflect the concerns of women, children, LGB persons, ethnic and religious minorities, and persons with disabilities in turn. Each redrafted judgment is accompanied by a paper outlining the theoretical concepts and frameworks that guided the approaches of the authors and explaining how each amendment to the original text is an improvement. Simultaneously, the authors demonstrate how difficult it can be to translate ideas into judgments, whilst also providing examples of what those ideas would look like in judicial language. By rewriting actual judicial decisions in a wide range of topics this book offers a broad overview of diversity issues in the jurisprudence of the ECHR and aims to bridge the gap between academic analysis and judicial practice.