Download Free Probability Presumptions And Evidentiary Burdens In Antitrust Analysis Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Probability Presumptions And Evidentiary Burdens In Antitrust Analysis and write the review.

The conservative critique of antitrust law has been highly influential and has facilitated a transformation of antitrust standards of conduct since the 1970s and led to increasingly more permissive standards of conduct. While these changes have taken many forms, all were influenced by the view that competition law was over-deterrent. Critics relied heavily on the assumption that the durability and costs of false positive errors far exceeded those of false negatives.Many of the assumptions that guided this retrenchment of antitrust rules were mistaken and advances in the law and in economic analysis have rendered them anachronistic, particularly with respect to exclusionary conduct. Continued reliance on what are now exaggerated fears of “false positives,” and failure adequately to consider the harm from “false negatives,” has led courts to impose excessive demands of proof on plaintiffs that belie both established procedural norms and sound economic analysis. The result is not better and more reasonable antitrust standards, but instead an embedded ideological preference for non-intervention that creates a tendency toward false negatives, particularly in modern markets characterized by economies of scale and network effects.In this article, we explain how these erroneous assumptions about markets, institutions, and conduct have distorted the antitrust decision-making process and produced an excessive risk of false negatives in exclusionary conduct cases involving firms attempting to achieve, maintain, or enhance dominance or substantial market power. To redress this imbalance, we integrate modern economic analysis and the teaching of decision theory with the foundational conventions of antitrust law, which has long relied on probability, presumptions, and reasonable inferences to provide more effective means for evaluating competitive effects and resolving antitrust claims.
Antitrust litigation often involves situations where important relevant information is limited or costly to obtain, behavior is complex and can have multiple explanations, or theory is not particularly well developed. As a result, legal and factual presumptions, evidentiary shortcuts, and assignment of the burden of proof can be critical and often decisive. This situation is common across all types of antitrust actions, including unilateral and collaborative conduct, as well as mergers. In general, the more complex an issue is or the market in which it occurs, the more valuable evidentiary shortcuts become, provided that they point us in the right direction. This paper considers how these constraints should be applied to large digital platform markets. Uniquely harsh treatment threatens an error that antitrust policy has made before, which is excessive management of a part of the economy that is in fact notable for its superior performance. The need for and nature of presumptions or other evidentiary shortcuts should be partly based on our overall assessment of performance. If we believe that the markets dominated by large digital platforms are performing poorly, with a great deal of monopoly and low customer satisfaction, then stronger evidentiary biases against them might be warranted. However, if we think they are performing relatively well, then perhaps such presumptions should be weakened or not employed at all.At the same time, however, the digital economy contains unique features that serve both to differentiate and to complicate antitrust analysis. Further, the opportunities for engaging in harmful exercises of market power are numerous. Large tech firms trade heavily, although not exclusively, in digital content; they have different cost structures than most traditional firms; they often operate on “two-sided” markets; and they are heavily involved in distribution with both direct and indirect network effects.
Presumptions have an impo ...
In this thoroughly revised new edition of what quickly became the authoritative work when first published in 2017, Fernando Castillo de la Torre and Eric Gippini Fournier, two of the most experienced litigators in EU competition law, update their systematic analysis of the case law of the EU Courts on the rules of evidence, proof and judicial review, as they are applied in EU competition law.
Elucidates the concept of causation in competition law damages and outlines its practical implications through relevant case law.
At a time when tech giants have amassed vast market power, Jonathan Baker shows how laws and regulations can be updated to ensure more competition. The sooner courts and antitrust enforcement agencies stop listening to the Chicago school and start paying attention to modern economics, the sooner Americans will reap the benefits of competition.
The definitive account of the trillion-dollar payment card industry. The payment card business has evolved from its inception in the 1950s as a way to handle payment for expense-account lunches (the Diners Club card) into today's complex, sprawling industry that drives trillions of dollars in transaction volume each year. Paying with Plastic is the definitive source on an industry that has revolutionized the way we borrow and spend. More than a history book, Paying with Plastic delivers an entertaining discussion of the impact of an industry that epitomizes the notion of two-sided markets: those in which two or more customer groups receive value only if all sides are actively engaged. New to this second edition, the two-sided market discussion provides useful insight into the implications of these market dynamics for cardholder rewards, merchant interchange fees, and card acceptance. The authors, both of whom have researched the industry for more than 25 years, also examine the implications of the recent antitrust cases on the industry as well as other business and technological changes—including the massive consolidation brought about by bank mergers, the rise of the debit card, and the emergence of e-commerce—that could alter the payment card industry dramatically in the years to come.
This volume offers contributions to questions relating to the economics of innovation and technological change. Central to the development of new technologies are institutional environments and among the topics discussed are the roles played by universities and the ways in which the allocation of funds affects innovation.
What rules or principles govern the assessment of evidence in EU competition enforcement? This book offers, for the first time, a comprehensive academic study on the topic. Its aim is twofold. Firstly, it produces a typology of evidence standards in competition proceedings at the EU level, thereby systemising the guidance that is currently dispersed in the case-law of the EU Courts. Secondly, it examines the applicable evidence rules and principles with a view to better understanding their role in EU competition enforcement. In so doing, the book illustrates that evidence standards are not mere technicalities and their significance should not be underestimated. Rigorous and engaging, this work provides a much-needed analysis of a key question of EU competition enforcement.