Download Free Forcible Protection Of Nationals Abroad Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Forcible Protection Of Nationals Abroad and write the review.

Legal scholars as well as states have long disagreed on the compatibility with the UN Charter of the so-called 'protection of nationals' doctrine. This doctrine suggests that states are allowed to forcibly intervene in other countries for the protection of their nationals abroad, subject to the following (cumulative) conditions: (i) there is an imminent threat of injury to nationals; (ii) a failure or inability on the part of the territorial sovereign to protect them and; (iii) the action of the intervening state is strictly confined to the objective of protecting its nationals. This article re-examines the available evidence in customary practice, while taking account of two new elements: on the one hand, the increased tolerance on behalf of the international community vis-à-vis unauthorised evacuation operations, and, on the other hand, the critical attitude of many states throughout the UN General Assembly debate on diplomatic protection in 2000. After finding that customary evidence fails to offer conclusive answers, the author makes some tentative suggestions de lege ferenda to find a way out of the existing legal impasse.
Under Attack makes a new contribution to the field of international relations in general and the study of international law and armed conflict in particular, in two core ways. First, it links information from varying disciplines, most notably international relations and international law, to form a comprehensive picture of state practice and the challenges it poses to the legal rules for the use of force. Secondly, it organises the information in such a way to identify two core groups of contemporary justifications used by states: humanitarian reasons and self-defence, both with their sub-categories. At the core of this book is the question of how state practice since 1990 has challenged the long-established legal regime on the international use of force. Are we merely witnessing a temporary and insignificant challenge to international law or are the rules genuinely under attack?