Download Free Encyclopaedia Of Forms And Precedents For Pleading And Practice At Common Law In Equity And Under The Various Codes And Practice Acts Vol 5 Classic Reprint Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Encyclopaedia Of Forms And Precedents For Pleading And Practice At Common Law In Equity And Under The Various Codes And Practice Acts Vol 5 Classic Reprint and write the review.

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1897 edition. Excerpt: ...of the sheriff to take the undivided share of the debtor without reference to the partnership account, but that a court of equity would take the account and ascertain what the sheriff ought to sell. Me. 89, which case is cited in New. hall v. Buckingham, 14 111. 405. Maryland.---Upon this question, see ihe obittr dictum of Dorsey, J., in M'Elderry v. Flannagan, I Har. & G. (Md.) 30S. Michigan.--Hutchinson v. Dubois, 4; Mich. 143, it would seem is an authority against the right of the officer to take possession of the firm's property. Without expressly passing upon the question, the court says: " A levy cannot touch a specific proportion of the goods, nor the whole, because others have property in every part as well as the whole, cuupled with a right, resting in contract, to use them for the purposes for which the partnership was instituted." Citing Church v. Knox, 2 Conn. 514, and Sirrine v. Briggs, 31 Mich. 443, in which cases the precise point determined was that the sheriff could not levy upon specific articles, and that he should have levied upon the partner's interest in the whole stock; Tappan v. Blaisdell, 5 N. H. 193; Atkins v. Saxton, 77 N. Y. 195, in which cases the right of the sheriff to take possession of the whole property was recognized; Reinheimer v. Hemingway, 35 Pa. St. 432; Deal v. Bogue, 20 Pa. St. 228; Knerr v. Hoffman, 65 Pa. St. 126. Minnesota.--Barrett v. McKenzie, 14 Minn. 20; Caldwell v. Auger, 4 Minn. 217; Wickham v. Davis, 24 Minn. 167. Mississippi.--Under Code 1880, 1770 (following the Codes of 1871 and 857), by which it was provided that the sheriff might levy upon property in which the defendant had an interest, but which was not exclusively in his own possession, without actually...
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1897 edition. Excerpt: ... ferry across the Delaware, one of whom held a New Jersey charter for his end of the ferry, and the other a Pennsylvania charter for his end, could not properly join in an action lor damages to the ferry caused by a bridge; but that, their chartered interests not being joint, separate actions must be brought. An Objection that Parties are Improperly Joined as plaintiffs should be made when the petition for the appointment of viewers is presented or, at the very latest, when the issue is framed by the court. Ehret v. Schuylkill River East Side R. Co., 151 Pa. St. 158. 6. Alabama.--To authorize one to be made a party in highway and ferry cases, he must have a private right, as an individual proprietor, which he can vindicate by suit, and the record must show his interest. Creswell r. Greene County, 24 Ala. 282. California.--A person through whose lands a proposed road will pass is beneficially interested, and is a proper party to contest the legality of the proceedings for the establishment of the road. Damrell z. San Joaquin County, 40 Cal. 154. Connecticut.--A cemetery association instituted a proceeding under the statute for enlarging its territory by taking adjoining lands owned in severalty by different persons. It was held that all the owners, though having no joint interest, were properly made defendants together. Evergreen Cemetery Assoc, v. Beecher, 53 Conn. 551. Indiana.--One through whose lands a drain will run must be a party to the proceedings by notice or otherwise, and, unless this appear on the trial, the whole proceeding must fail. Wright v. Wilson, 95 Ind. 408. Where the proceedings are instituted by the party seeking the condemnation, it goes without saying that the owner of the land sought to be taken must be made a...
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1896 edition. Excerpt: ... Paige (N. Y.) 637; Innes v. Lansing, 7 Paige (N. Y'.)s83; Derby r. Yale, 13 Hun (N. Y.) 273; Cummins v. Bennett, 8 Paige (N. Y.) 79, in which last case it was said to be a matter of course to permit the complainant to dismiss his bill at any time before decree upon payment of costs. But see Salisbury v. Binghamton Pub. Co., 85 Hun (N. Y.) 99; Matter of Butler, 101 N. Y. 309; Young v. Bush, 36 How. Pr. (N. Y. Supreme Ct.) 240; Wilder v. Boynton, 63 Barb.;N. Y.) 547; Carleton v. Darcy, 75 N. Y. 375, holding that the right of the complainant to dismiss is not absolute but rests in the discretion of the court. After Appointment of Receiver.--In Belmont Nail Co. v. Columbia Iron, etc., Co., 46 Fed. Rep. 336, a bill was filed in behalf of all the creditors of an insolvent corporation, for the administration of its assets, and it was determined that after the appointment of a receiver, in pursuance of the prayer of the bill, the complainant had no right to dismiss the bill with the consent of the defendant, against the wishes of other creditors who sought to come in as parties. See also Atlas Bank v. Nahant Bank, 23 Pick. (Mass.) 480; in which case a bill filed by one creditor for the benefit of himself and others, for the appointment of a receiver for an insolvent bank, was regarded as substantially a proceeding in behalf of all the creditors, and the plaintiff was denied leave to discontinue the bill. In Fay v. Erie, etc., R. Bank, Harr. (Mich.) 194, an individual creditor had filed his bill against a corporation, obtained an injunctionand the appointment of a receiver, and the receiver had taken upon himself the trust, and other creditors had filed their claims; and it was determined that the creditor who filed the bill was not entitled, as...
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1896 edition. Excerpt: ...the pro sion to file the original papers, as re-ceedings appearing upon the record of quired by statute, in the court to the court, which, together with the which the change is made, is not indictment and all other papers in the waived by the appearance of the case, must be transmitted to the clerk party against whom the change was of the court to which the venue has made, for the purpose of moving to been changed," simply requires a tran dismiss the action. Hall v. Royce, script of the entries in the "record 56 Iowa 359. 3. Harrall v. State, 26 Ala. 52. See Ammons v. State, 9 Fla. 530. "Proceedings" Denned.--"Proceedings," in a statute requiring transmission of a transcript of the proceedings, merely means the orders made book," together with the indictment and all the papers, but does not require the transmission of a transcript of the indictment and of all the original papers as well as the papers themselves. Sharp v. State, 2 Iowa 454. Under a statute requiring the transaffidavit, and information thereon to be transmitted;1 but in some jurisdictions mere copies or transcripts are sufficient. b. Sufficiency Of Transcript.--Where all the original papers, or copies thereof, are not required to be transmitted, a transcript of the record should be sent for the purpose of acquainting the new court with the status of the case. mission of the transcript and the original papers, it is unnecessary that the indictment should be copied at length in the transcript. Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144. The transcript need not contain a copy of the indictment, where the original indictment is sufficiently identified by being sealed up and transmitted with the transcript and other papers. Leslie v. State, 83 Ind. 180....
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1895 edition. Excerpt: ...corporation an omission to aver its corporate character may be amended. Southern L. Ins. Co. v. Roberts, 60 Ala. 431. See also Jemison v. Planters', etc., Bank, 23 Ala. 168; St. Louis, etc., R. Co. v. Camden Bank, 47 Ark. 541. Members of a corporate board suing in their own names on a corporate right may amend by describing themselves as a corporation. M. E. Church v. Town, 49 Vt. 29; Shoudy v. School Directors, 32 111. 290; Yocum v. Waynesville, 39 111. 220. Plaintiff suing on a note may amend by adding averments that he sues not as a payee, but as assignee or owner. Long v. Patterson, 51 Ala. 414. Plaintiff may amend by describing himself as " doing business under the name of " another person. Hathaway v. Sabin, 61 Vt. 608. Plaintiffs suing as heirs of B. may amend by claiming as the heirs of A. Reams v. Spann, 28 S. Car. 530. An infant suing in his own name may amend so as to sue by guardian. Sabine v. Fisher, 37 Wis. 376. A suit by a voluntary association cannot be amended into a suit under the name by which it was subsequently incorporated. Marsh River Lodge v. Brooks, 61 Me. 585. 3. Johr v. St. Clair County, 38 Mich. 532; O'Connell v. Schwanabeck, 76 Mich. 517; Donovan v. Halsey Fire Engine Co., 58 Mich. 38; Rutherford v. Hobbs, 63 Ga. 243; Van Pelt v. Chattanooga, etc., R. Co., 89 Ga. 706; Tumlin v. Quarles, 26 Ga. 395; Humphries v. Dawson, 38 Ala. 199. See also Cannon v. Mathis, 10 Heisk. (Tenn.) 575 One suing as an heir at law may amend so as to sue as executor. Hines v. Rutherford. 67 Ga. 606. Or, suing as executor may amend by declaring as administrator. Risley v. Wiphtman, 13 Hun (N. Y.) 163. Plaintiff suing as agent may strike artificial person is beyond the reach of amendment.1 c. Misdescription Of...
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1895 edition. Excerpt: ... Furlow v. Merrell, 23 Ala. 705; Nash v. Shrader, 27 Ala. 377; Gillespie v. Burleson, 28 Ala. 552; Smith v. Garrett, 31 Ala. 492; Lewis v. I'.iull. 42 Ala. 136; Thomasson v. Groce. 42 Ala. 431. Colorado.--Martin v. Force, 3 Colo. 199. Illinois.--Rogers v. Hall, 4 111. 5; McKee v. Ingalls, 5 111. 30; Michigan City First Nat. Bank v. Haskell, 23 111. App. 616; Chicago City R. Co. v. Duffin, 24 111. App. 28; Monroe v. Snow. 33 111. App. 230. Ohio.--Hollister v. Reznor, 9 Ohio St. I. But it must be so construed as to have a reasonable meaning, Smith v. Garrett, 31 Ala. 493; and avoid inconsistencies, Goodgame v. Clifton, 13 Ala. 583; and words will be given their natural import and meaning, Thompson v. Drake, 32 Ala. 99. In Virginia, however, early cases hold that where a bill of exceptions to an instruction given by the trial judge to the jury is so vague and confused that the appellate court cannot understand the precise state of the case nor the effect of the instructions, judgment will be reversed, the verdict set aside, and the cause remanded for new trial. Bowyer v. Chesnut, 4 Leigh (Va.) 1; Raines v. Philips, I Leigh (Va.) 483; Thompson v. Cumming, 2 Leigh (Va.) 321. Printed Record.--In Wisconsin It is held that where the bill of exceptions contradicts the printed record and is confused and unintelligible, the points attempted to be raised will not be reversed. Green v. Stacy (Wis., 1895), 62 N. W. Rep. 627. In Criminal Case--Indiana.--In a criminal case, however, it was held in Indiana that where the bill of exceptions embodied two contradictory statements favorable to the prisoner it would be adopted. Willey v. State, 52 Ind. 251. 2. Florida.--Livingston v. Cooper, 22 Fla. 292; Myrick v. Merritt, 22 Fla. 335; Blige v. State, 20 Fla....