Download Free Us Department Of Agricultures Government Performance And Results Act Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Us Department Of Agricultures Government Performance And Results Act and write the review.

"Without aggressive congressional oversight and intervention, we should not be surprised to discover federal agencies, USDA in particular, using their strategic plans to justify their current mode of operation, or even worse, attempting to expand their authority and budgets. The purpose of this hearing is [to] confirm that USDA believes in good government and the intent of the Results Act, which is to make the federal government more [accountable] and responsible to the American public"--Pages 1-2.
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) annual performance plan for fiscal year 1999. GAO noted that: (1) USDA's performance plan partially meets the criteria set forth in the Government Performance and Results Act and related guidance; (2) specifically, the plan provides a limited picture of intended performance across the Department and partially discusses the ways in which USDA's strategies and resources will help it achieve the plan's performance goals; (3) however, the plan provides little confidence that the information USDA will use to assess performance will be accurate, complete, and credible; (4) the strengths of USDA's performance plan are that most of its component plans have: (a) linked their annual performance goals and indicators to their 5-year strategic goals; (b) described their strategies to accomplish their goals; and (c) described, at least partially, the capital, human, financial, and other resources they will use to achieve their performance goals; (5) in addition, the component plans have formats that are generally consistent, and they attempt to address all of the key criteria for a good plan; and (6) the key areas in which USDA's performance plan could be improved to better meet the purposes of the Results Act include: (a) explaining how USDA agencies are coordinating crosscutting issues both within and outside the Department; (b) discussing mitigation strategies for each significant external factor that may interfere with the achievement of performance goals; (c) describing the procedures that will be used to ensure that the data needed to measure progress in meeting performance goals are complete, accurate, and credible; and (d) identifying what, if any, limitations exist with respect to the data used for measuring performance.
As you requested, we reviewed the U. S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) fiscal year 2000 performance report and fiscal year 2002 performance plan required by the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) to assess the agency's progress in achieving selected key outcomes that you identified as important mission areas for the agency. USDA presented one performance report with agency-by-agency coverage and 1 departmental and 24 agency and office performance plans. We reviewed the same outcomes we addressed in our June 2000 review of the agency's fiscal year 1999 performance report and fiscal year 2001 performance plans to provide a baseline by which to measure the agency's performance from year-to-year. These selected key outcomes are ̂ensuring an adequate and reasonably priced food supply; ̂opening, expanding, and maintaining global market opportunities for agricultural producers; ̂reducing hunger and ensuring food for the hungry; ̂ensuring a safe and wholesome food supply; and reducing food stamp fraud and error.
Results Act: Observations on the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Annual Performance Plan for Fiscal Year 1999
RCED-99-187 Results Act: Observations on the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Fiscal Year 2000 Performance Plan