Download Free The Protection Of Legitimate Expectations In Administrative Law Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online The Protection Of Legitimate Expectations In Administrative Law and write the review.

This original and stimulating book is the first systematic study of the principle of `legitimate expectations' in administrative law to appear in the English language. The notion of reasonable or legitimate expectations has played a central role in the development of administrative law over the last thirty years and it remains one of the most contentious and most frequently invoked grounds of judicial review. In this book Dr Schonberg provides a detailed, comparative, and critical analysis of that notion He begins by clarifying why administrative law should protect expectations at all, by linking expectations to fairness, trust in administration, and the Rule of Law with its requirements of legal certainty and formal equality. In the light of this framework he examines in detail the principles and rules which contribute to the protection of expectations. The scope of this analysis is broad, looking both at procedural and substantive principles of administrative law as wellas principles of tort liability and stautory compensation. In all of these areas, English law is carefully compared with French and EC law and is shown how the three legal systems often reach similar outcomes by the application of different legal principles and rules. The current state of English law is examined critically in the light of the comparative study of French and EC law, and a number of original suggestions for legal reform are presented. They include the adoption of: a generalprinciple of irrevocability of intra vires administrative decisions, a distinct principle of substantive legitimate expectations subject to a `significant imbalance' threshold for judicial intervention, and a statutory right to compensation for loss caused by `sufficiently serious' violations of public law.
Presents a comparison of the development in European and English law of two legal principles, legitimate expectations and proportionality, against the different traditions of administrative law. Looks at case law of the English courts and the European Court of Justice, and explains why English courts have been troubled by legitimate expectations and proportionality and how such difficulties can be resolved. Suggests that problems associated with these principles are connected to different cultural approaches to the appropriate role of law in the modern state. Of interest to administrative lawyers. The author teaches law at the University of Manchester. Distributed by ISBS. c. Book News Inc.
The protection of legitimate expectations appears to be a key concept of administrative law in Europe; it defines the legal position of the individual vis-à-vis the public authorities and is, thus, a gateway for constitutional considerations in administrative law. This book presents the results of a comparative research project dealing with the question if, to what extent, and in which ways the legitimate expectations of private parties are considered in procedures leading to a primary administrative decision and, where available, in subsequent review procedures before administrative, judicial or quasi-judicial bodies. Furthermore, the project examines if, and to what extent, European and national legal orders, as well as international legal regimes, guarantee compensation in cases where provisions concerning the protection of legitimate expectations have been disregarded. The contributions to the book, including surveys of the theoretical and philosophical background, country reports and comparative analyses, are written by scholars from 16 European countries, giving an insight into the various legal systems, their understanding of, and their methods of interpreting and applying, administrative law.
Examines the philosophical foundation of legitimate expectations to create a normative framework for use in investment treaty arbitration
This thesis considers the Europeanisation of English administrative law, in the specific context of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations. It assesses whether, how and to what extent the way in which the way in which legitimate expectations are protected in EU law has influenced the protection of legitimate expectations in English law. To make this assessment, a thorough analysis is conducted of case law in both jurisdictions. The thesis is structured into five main Chapters. Chapter A provides an introduction and looks at some general issues surrounding the concept of legitimate expectation, including which expectations are protectable and what is meant by legitimacy. Chapter B traces the development of the protection of legitimate expectations in English and EU law, and considers certain particular features in more detail for each jurisdiction, with the aim of establishing some parameters against which more recent case law can be tested and compared. In Chapter C an in-depth analysis of recent case law of the English courts, both falling within and outside the scope of EU law, is undertaken, and comparisons are drawn between these cases and with the traditional position of EU law on the protection of legitimate expectations. Chapter D contains a similar analysis in respect of recent cases of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Finally, Chapter E draws these analyses together and concludes that while there is limited convergence in the way English and EU courts approach the protection of legitimate expectations, both jurisdictions remain wary of external influence.
This article delves into the evolution and application of the doctrine of legitimate expectation in administrative law, exploring its fundamental principles and implications. The concept of legitimate expectation has emerged as a vital bridge between the Rule of Estoppel and the Principle of Administrative Fairness, serving to safeguard individuals against arbitrary exercise of power by state agencies. Further examines the theoretical underpinnings of legitimate expectation, its procedural and substantive aspects, and its significance in ensuring good governance. Through an analysis of key cases from different jurisdictions, including Sri Lanka, the article evaluates the development of the doctrine and its interplay with principles of natural justice and equality. The article also discusses the challenges and ambiguities faced in distinguishing between procedural and substantive legitimate expectations. Overall, it highlights the importance of maintaining a delicate balance between protecting legitimate expectations and prioritizing the public interest, while emphasizing the evolving nature of this doctrine within the realm of administrative law.
The recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. Although the substantive form of legitimate expectation adopted in Coughlan was quickly accepted by English courts and received a generally favourable response from public law scholars, the doctrine of that case has largely been rejected in other common law jurisdictions. The central principles of Coughlan have been rejected by courts in common law jurisdictions outside the UK for a range of reasons, such as incompatibility with local constitutional doctrine, or because they mark an undesirable drift towards merits review. The sceptical and critical reception to Coughlan outside England is a striking contrast to the reception the case received within the UK. This book provides a detailed scholarly analysis of these issues and considers the doctrine of legitimate expectations both in England and elsewhere in the common law world.
A new framework for understanding contemporary administrative law, through a comparative analysis of case law from Australia, Canada, England, Ireland, and New Zealand. The author argues that the field is structured by four values: individual self-realisation, good administration, electoral legitimacy and decisional autonomy.
This book provides a thorough evaluation of the complex relationship between legitimate expectations and the protection of property guaranteed by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights. To set the context, the book first gives a brief but comprehensive analysis of property rights from Ancient Greek times until now. Subsequently, it compares the protection of legitimate expectations with its underlying principles in other legal orders. The book addresses three main research questions: What are the conditions for the creation and protection of legitimate expectations in the context of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? What roles do confidence, detriment, and fair balance play in that context? What purposes do legitimate expectations fulfill in the context of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? To answer these questions, the book offers an extensive analysis of the European Court of Human Rights' case-law related to legitimate expectations under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. The book collects and lists the main misunderstandings with respect to legitimate expectations in cases brought before the European Court of Human Rights. The conclusion assesses the major results and paves the way for future debate about the doctrine of legitimate expectations under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
The book examines the conception of legitimate expectations in international investment law under the fair and equitable treatment. The author examines the purpose, content and elements of legitimate expectations. He also analyses the case law to identify and explain the protection granted to expectations of foreign investors under investment treaties. To this end, the book distinguishes the core elements of legitimate expectations, with particular attention being given both to the conduct of the host State and legitimacy of expectations, and provides a detailed analysis of these issues to consider whether good faith forms the basis for the protection of legitimate expectations. Combining a jurisprudential analysis of the case law arising in international tribunals with a dogmatic and scholar approach, this book offers a thought-provoking study of the protection of legitimate expectations, for students and practitioners alike. This book was prepared by the author in his personal capacity. The opinions expressed in the book are the author’s own and do not reflect the view of any other person or entity. Marcin Kałduński is Professor of International Law at the Nicolaus Copernicus University (Toruń, Poland) and Counsel at the General Counsel to the Republic of Poland. He teaches international law and acts as counsel in investment arbitration.