Download Free The Kentucky Law Reporter Volume 5 Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online The Kentucky Law Reporter Volume 5 and write the review.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Excerpt from The Kentucky Law Reporter, Vol. 9: July, 1887 to July, 1888 Here the verbal statement made by the agent prior to or at the delivery of the policy is held sufficient to establish a contract entirely inconsistent with the writing, in the absence of either fraud or mistake in its execution. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1906 edition. Excerpt: ...to grant the exclusive franchise as above set forth, then by this or-dinance the said P. Arlund & Co. and assigns shall have hereunder a franchise for the purposes herein set forth instead of exclusive franchise, at flrst herein stated." On the face of the ordinance it is apparent that the common council of' New Richmond doubted its right to grant an exclusive franchise. and consequently left the question of whether it was or not exclusive to be determined by the law of that State. It is equally clear from the evidence presented by the record that the laws of Ohio forbade the granting of an exclusive franchise. Indeed, this is admitted by appellants. It was important, therefore, for appellee to prove upon the trial that Arlund and Tevis induced him to enter into the contract providing for the erection of the electric plant by representing the franchise to be exclusive, and that theaction of the municipal authorities and inhabitants of New Richmond, in taking steps to erect a similar plant for the town, prevented appellee and appellants from carrying out the contract between them. On these points the testimony was conflicting, but we think the weight of it was on the side of appellee's contention; at any rate, the questions were properly submitted to the jury, and their decision was and is flnal. The testimony was also cdntlicting as to whether there was an agreement between appellants and appellee after the contract was made to abandon the execution thereof, and while we can not say that the weight of it on this vol. 28-48 754 SHEFFIELD v. DAY, ac. point was in favor oi.' appellee, there was some evidence to support his theory of abandonment, and of the truth of that proposition, as well as the others, the jury...
Excerpt from The Kentucky Law Reporter, Vol. 16: July 1, 1894, to June 15, 1895 Covington City of v. Hallam 8: Divers Covington. City of, Maokoy. Covington. City of. Simrall v Covington Stock Yards Co. V. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Excerpt from The Kentucky Law Reporter, Vol. 24: Part I, July 1, 1902, to January 1, 1903 On page 596, third subdivision of syllabus, section 4397, Kentucky Statutes, should he 489. Code of Practice. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1886 edition. Excerpt: ...to the preparation of the bill of exceptions with a view of presenting the exceptions in a proper form to this court, and when coming here with the signature of the judge and nothing to show an omission from the record of a part of the evidence or a part of the instructions (when all should be embodied in the bill), the bill will be regarded as in compliance with the provisions of the Code. Under the former practice cases can be found where bills of exception have been excluded on extremely technical grounds by adhering to the very letter of the Code, when the court, too, upon an inspection of the record, must have been satisfied that the bill was complete. Those decisions proceeded upon the idea that it must affirm-atively appear that the bill contained all the evidence or all the instructions, when the signature of the trial court, whe there record failed to show any omission of the evidence or instructions, was all that should have been required. The bill of exceptions in this case appearing to be complete there is no reason for disregarding it. In this case it appears from the bill that when giving instruction N0. 2 by the court on its own motion I/ze dz'fcentswa'an/s excepted, and when refusing to give instruction No. 6 I/12 defendant: excepted. Afiidavits of counsel appear in the record showing that these exceptions were not taken as they appear in the bill, and were not reserved until after the trial. These affidavits will not be considered as destroying the verity of the record when certified by the court below to be proper. The truth of what the judge states or certifies as the bill of evidence may be controverted by the afifidavit of by-standers in the form of a bill of evidence, but when he certifies as to his own rulings an