Download Free The Derivative Action In Asia Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online The Derivative Action In Asia and write the review.

This in-depth comparative examination of the derivative action in Asia provides a framework for analysing its function, history and practical application and examines in detail how derivative actions law works in practice in seven important Asian jurisdictions (China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Singapore). These case studies allow an evaluation of a number of the leading Western comparative corporate law and governance theories which have come to define the field over the last decade. By debunking some of these critically important theories, this book lays the foundation for an accurate understanding of the derivative action in Asia and a re-examination of the regulation of the derivative action around the world.
This Article uses the derivative action in Asia as a lens for re-evaluating the foundational theories of Asian and comparative corporate law. It begins by demonstrating that the cultural theory of “Asian non-litigiousness” provides scant explanatory or predictive value for either the evolution or function of the derivative action in Asia's leading economies. As such, this Article suggests that the theory of Asian non-litigiousness should be relegated to the dustbin of academic history. Without the black box of Asian culture to erroneously explain away potential differences between “Asian” and “Western” derivative actions, the reality of the derivative action in Asia's leading economies becomes markedly more important. It allows evidence from the derivative action in Asia to be used as a valuable litmus test for three of comparative corporate law's most important theories which all claim universal applicability (the three “grand universal theories”). This Article demonstrates, using evidence from the derivative action in Asia, that the claim of universal applicability, which under-pins the grand universal theories, is erroneous. Indeed, this Article turns the grand universal theories on their heads by demonstrating that they not only fail to explain the derivative action in Asia but also terribly mislead. As such, this Article concludes by suggesting that comparative corporate law should replace its lust for grand universal theories with a quest for understanding (rather than avoiding) the complex reality that is inherent in comparative corporate law.
Context matters. Take a step back and look at some 170 years of history of derivative actions and at the pertinent developments on three continents, and you will see a seemingly endless regulatory quest for what we have termed the 'Holy Grail' of derivative actions regulation (i.e., the appropriate balance between the necessary incentives to ensure that derivative actions are pursued effectively and the indispensable safe- guards to prevent their abuse). Few, if any, legislatures or courts have been able to grasp this elusive goal; perhaps, like the Holy Grail itself, it may never be grasped. This book's analysis of the foundational jurisdictions of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and France and our seven major Asian jurisdictions illustrates that, whether in the East or the West, local context is critically important. Local context matters because it varies, in unpredictable ways, from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and within each jurisdiction over time. Each jurisdiction's local context is defined by a myriad of unique features, including its law, economy, institutions and sociopolitical environment. The limitless permutations of how these contextual features can combine is what uniquely shapes the functionality of derivative actions in each jurisdiction, makes the quest for the 'Holy Grail' so elusive and causes the derivative action to be so complex. In this sense, it is the complexity of each jurisdiction's unique and evolving local context that forms the core of our comparative and functional understanding of the derivative action in this book. For some, our emphasis on local context and boundless complexity may disappoint. Local context and boundless complexity do not lend themselves to large overarching universal theories; and this book, unapologetically, does not provide one. There is no one answer for how the derivative action functions in Asia. Rather, the reality is that he derivative action in Asia is very much local, very much contextual and, we suspect, very inconvenient for comparative corporate law scholars who lust for grand theories. The inconvenient truth is that the derivative action in our seven jurisdictions does not lend itself to being coded, plugged into a regression analysis and revealed through statistical significance. It also does not lend itself to a neat taxonomy of rules or strategies. Rather, it is a phenomenon that, in all probability, can be properly understood only through an in-depth understanding of a myriad of local, highly contextual, factors that shape how the derivative action actually functions in practice. To add to the inconvenience, once the contextual factors are measured they have to be remeasured in the future, as they constantly evolve and do not necessarily progress in a predictable way along any 'dependent path'. This observation may sound obvious - perhaps because it is. It is still meaningful, however, as the field of comparative corporate law has developed a proclivity for chasing grand theories. This book seeks to quell that proclivity by squarely challenging a number of the foundational comparative theories that have been used to explain derivative actions, shareholder litigation and corporate governance in Asia and around the world.
The derivative action, also known as the derivative suit (in the United States), Aktionärsklage (Germany), kabunushi daihyo sosho (Japan), action sociale ut singuli (France) and paisheng susong (PRC) (among others), is a global phenomenon. It originated in the common law world and is regarded by some as 'one of the most interesting and ingenious ... accountability mechanisms for large formal organizations'. As a potentially powerful elixir for corporate governance ills, the derivative action has captivated lawmakers for well over a century. It is also a subject that has long intrigued academics - and rightfully so. The beauty of the derivative action is truly in the eye of the beholder, making it ripe for scholarly debate. Depending on one's vantage point, it can be seen as either a functional necessity for meaningfully enforcing directors' duties, which mitigates agency costs, or a corporate governance mechanism inherently vexed by a litany of complex procedural problems, which stifles entrepreneurship. We suspect that, after reading this book, you will conclude that the truth about the derivative action in Asia lies somewhere in between these two extremes. This chapter provides a general theoretical framework for the book and links the ongoing international discussion about the pros and cons of the derivative action with the seven jurisdiction-specific chapters in this volume. The balance of this chapter is organized on the basis of three perspectives from which derivative actions can be analysed. It starts, in section II, by providing an economic perspective, which identifies the primary features and functions (including the functional deficits) of the derivative action as a mechanism for improving the efficiency of corporate governance. It then examines a striking paradox in the economic incentives that drive derivative actions: most empirical evidence suggests that derivative actions normally result in a net economic loss for the plaintiff shareholder pursuing the action (and even for the individual company involved), but they are still commonly viewed by most legislators and judges as an indispensable deterrent against reckless behaviour by directors, controlling shareholders and others who may owe a duty to the company. In a similar vein, this section pays special attention to the difficulty of designing a derivative action that incentivizes shareholders to pursue derivative actions, which enhance corporate governance efficiency, while at the same time preventing their abuse (i.e., the Holy Grail). Next, in section III, this chapter examines the derivative action from a historical perspective, by tracing its modern origins to the common law jurisprudence of the United States and the United Kingdom in the nineteenth century. The German historical experience is also briefly considered, so as to highlight its long history of rejecting the introduction of a US-/UK-style derivative action (until 2005), instead relying on functionally equivalent corporate governance solutions. This historical overview provides an important context for understanding the derivative action in Asia, as most leading Asian jurisdictions have transplanted some or all of the legal framework governing their derivative actions from the United States, the United Kingdom or Germany. This chapter concludes, in section IV, by viewing the derivative action from a practice-oriented perspective, which focuses on how the derivative action is actually working in selected major non-Asian jurisdictions. This section includes an examination of the United Kingdom (with a focus on the statutory derivative action, which was recently implemented in the Companies Act of 2006), the United States (with a focus on Delaware corporate law and the Model Business Corporations Act), France (with a focus on its role as a forerunner in derivative actions legislation in continental Europe) and Germany (with a focus on its recent introduction of a statutory derivative action that was ambitiously, but not necessarily successfully, designed to avoid the pitfalls of the US system).
Culture and Business in Asia is an analytical, comparative guide to modern Asian business. Using in-depth interviews, it describes the links between culture and business in India, China (including Hong Kong), Japan, Taiwan and Singapore. Each chapter examines the influence of business culture on decision-making in the areas of ownership, finance, governance, organisation, management and strategy. Key benefits: - Gives a vivid view of how Asian business decision-makers experience the world of work - Includes a unique focus on India - Encourages critical thinking - Examines the relationship of social, political and economic cultures to business. - Provides a cultural platform for business in the profitable but competitive markets of Asia.
Comparative Takeover Regulation compares the laws relating to takeovers in leading Asian economies and relates them to broader global developments. It is ideal for educational institutions that teach corporate law, corporate governance, and mergers and acquisitions, as well as for law firms, corporate counsel and other practitioners.
This research handbook provides a state-of-the-art perspective on how corporate governance differs between countries around the world. It covers highly topical issues including corporate purpose, corporate social responsibility and shareholder activism.
The quality of its business leadership is a key issue for the future development of Asia’s economies. Although Asia’s economies have grown spectacularly in recent decades, they are currently facing increasing challenges. This book explores the current state of business leaders and leadership in Asia. It demonstrates that there is no single model of Asian business leadership, and that Western models often do not fit easily alongside Asian cultural values. It discusses how relatively developed Asian economies – Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Singapore, and former socialist economies – China and Vietnam – all have different types of business leadership challenges at present. The book concludes by assessing how business leadership in Asia is likely to develop in future.
In class actions, attorneys effectively hire clients rather than act as their agent. Lawyer-financed, lawyer-controlled, and lawyer-settled, this entrepreneurial litigation invites lawyers to act in their own interest. John Coffee’s goal is to save class action, not discard it, and to make private enforcement of law more democratically accountable.
Seventy years have passed since the end of the Asia-Pacific War, yet Japan remains embroiled in controversy with its neighbors over the war’s commemoration. Among the many points of contention between Japan, China, and South Korea are interpretations of the Tokyo War Crimes Trial, apologies and compensation for foreign victims of Japanese aggression, prime ministerial visits to the Yasukuni Shrine, and the war’s portrayal in textbooks. Collectively, these controversies have come to be called the “history problem.” But why has the problem become so intractable? Can it ever be resolved, and if so, how? To answer these questions author Hiro Saito mobilizes the sociology of collective memory and social movements, political theories of apology and reconciliation, psychological research on intergroup conflict, and philosophical reflections on memory and history. The history problem, he argues, is essentially a relational phenomenon caused when nations publicly showcase self-serving versions of the past at key ceremonies and events: Japan, South Korea, and China all focus on what happened to their own citizens with little regard for foreign others. Saito goes on to explore the emergence of a cosmopolitan form of commemoration taking humanity, rather than nationality, as its primary frame of reference, an approach increasingly used by a transnational network of advocacy NGOs, victims of Japan’s past wrongdoings, historians, and educators. When cosmopolitan commemoration is practiced as a collective endeavor by both perpetrators and victims, Saito argues, a resolution of the history problem—and eventual reconciliation—will finally become possible. The History Problem examines a vast corpus of historical material in both English and Japanese, offering provocative findings that challenge orthodox explanations. Written in clear and accessible prose, this uniquely interdisciplinary book will appeal to sociologists, political scientists, and historians researching collective memory, nationalism and cosmopolitanism, and international relations—and to anyone interested in the commemoration of historical wrongs. An electronic version of this book is freely available thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched, a collaborative initiative designed to make high-quality books open access for the public good. The open-access version of this book is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which means that the work may be freely downloaded and shared for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. Derivative works and commercial uses require permission from the publisher.