Download Free Text Processing And Sentiment Analysis Using Machine Learning And Deep Learning With Python Gui Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Text Processing And Sentiment Analysis Using Machine Learning And Deep Learning With Python Gui and write the review.

In this book, we explored a code implementation for sentiment analysis using machine learning models, including XGBoost, LightGBM, and LSTM. The code aimed to build, train, and evaluate these models on Twitter data to classify sentiments. Throughout the project, we gained insights into the key steps involved and observed the findings and functionalities of the code. Sentiment analysis is a vital task in natural language processing, and the code was to give a comprehensive approach to tackle it. The implementation began by checking if pre-trained models for XGBoost and LightGBM existed. If available, the models were loaded; otherwise, new models were built and trained. This approach allowed for reusability of trained models, saving time and effort in subsequent runs. Similarly, the code checked if preprocessed data for LSTM existed. If not, it performed tokenization and padding on the text data, splitting it into train, test, and validation sets. The preprocessed data was saved for future use. The code also provided a function to build and train the LSTM model. It defined the model architecture using the Keras Sequential API, incorporating layers like embedding, convolutional, max pooling, bidirectional LSTM, dropout, and dense output. The model was compiled with appropriate loss and optimization functions. Training was carried out, with early stopping implemented to prevent overfitting. After training, the model summary was printed, and both the model and training history were saved for future reference. The train_lstm function ensured that the LSTM model was ready for prediction by checking the existence of preprocessed data and trained models. If necessary, it performed the required preprocessing and model building steps. The pred_lstm() function was responsible for loading the LSTM model and generating predictions for the test data. The function returned the predicted sentiment labels, allowing for further analysis and evaluation. To facilitate user interaction, the code included a functionality to choose the LSTM model for prediction. The choose_prediction_lstm() function was triggered when the user selected the LSTM option from a dropdown menu. It called the pred_lstm() function, performed evaluation tasks, and visualized the results. Confusion matrices and true vs. predicted value plots were generated to assess the model's performance. Additionally, the loss and accuracy history from training were plotted, providing insights into the model's learning process. In conclusion, this project provided a comprehensive overview of sentiment analysis using machine learning models. The code implementation showcased the steps involved in building, training, and evaluating models like XGBoost, LightGBM, and LSTM. It emphasized the importance of data preprocessing, model building, and evaluation in sentiment analysis tasks. The code also demonstrated functionalities for reusing pre-trained models and saving preprocessed data, enhancing efficiency and ease of use. Through visualization techniques, such as confusion matrices and accuracy/loss curves, the code enabled a better understanding of the model's performance and learning dynamics. Overall, this project highlighted the practical aspects of sentiment analysis and illustrated how different machine learning models can be employed to tackle this task effectively.
PROJECT 1: TEXT PROCESSING AND SENTIMENT ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING WITH PYTHON GUI Twitter data used in this project was scraped from February of 2015 and contributors were asked to first classify positive, negative, and neutral tweets, followed by categorizing negative reasons (such as "late flight" or "rude service"). This data was originally posted by Crowdflower last February and includes tweets about 6 major US airlines. Additionally, Crowdflower had their workers extract the sentiment from the tweet as well as what the passenger was dissapointed about if the tweet was negative. The information of main attributes for this project are as follows: airline_sentiment : Sentiment classification.(positivie, neutral, and negative); negativereason : Reason selected for the negative opinion; airline : Name of 6 US Airlines('Delta', 'United', 'Southwest', 'US Airways', 'Virgin America', 'American'); and text : Customer's opinion. The models used in this project are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Adaboost, LGBM classifier, Gradient Boosting, and XGB classifier, and LSTM. Three vectorizers used in machine learning are Hashing Vectorizer, Count Vectorizer, and TFID Vectorizer. Finally, you will develop a GUI using PyQt5 to plot cross validation score, predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy. PROJECT 2: HOTEL REVIEW: SENTIMENT ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING WITH PYTHON GUI The data used in this project is the data published by Anurag Sharma about hotel reviews that were given by costumers. The data is given in two files, a train and test. The train.csv is the training data, containing unique User_ID for each entry with the review entered by a costumer and the browser and device used. The target variable is Is_Response, a variable that states whether the costumers was happy or not happy while staying in the hotel. This type of variable makes the project to a classification problem. The test.csv is the testing data, contains similar headings as the train data, without the target variable. The models used in this project are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Adaboost, LGBM classifier, Gradient Boosting, and XGB classifier, and LSTM. Three vectorizers used in machine learning are Hashing Vectorizer, Count Vectorizer, and TFID Vectorizer. Finally, you will develop a GUI using PyQt5 to plot cross validation score, predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy. PROJECT 3: STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING WITH PYTHON GUI The dataset used in this project consists of student achievement in secondary education of two Portuguese schools. The data attributes include student grades, demographic, social and school-related features) and it was collected by using school reports and questionnaires. Two datasets are provided regarding the performance in two distinct subjects: Mathematics (mat) and Portuguese language (por). In the two datasets were modeled under binary/five-level classification and regression tasks. Important note: the target attribute G3 has a strong correlation with attributes G2 and G1. This occurs because G3 is the final year grade (issued at the 3rd period), while G1 and G2 correspond to the 1st and 2nd period grades. It is more difficult to predict G3 without G2 and G1, but such prediction is much more useful. Attributes in the dataset are as follows: school - student's school (binary: 'GP' - Gabriel Pereira or 'MS' - Mousinho da Silveira); sex - student's sex (binary: 'F' - female or 'M' - male); age - student's age (numeric: from 15 to 22); address - student's home address type (binary: 'U' - urban or 'R' - rural); famsize - family size (binary: 'LE3' - less or equal to 3 or 'GT3' - greater than 3); Pstatus - parent's cohabitation status (binary: 'T' - living together or 'A' - apart); Medu - mother's education (numeric: 0 - none, 1 - primary education (4th grade), 2 - 5th to 9th grade, 3 - secondary education or 4 - higher education); Fedu - father's education (numeric: 0 - none, 1 - primary education (4th grade), 2 - 5th to 9th grade, 3 - secondary education or 4 - higher education); Mjob - mother's job (nominal: 'teacher', 'health' care related, civil 'services' (e.g. administrative or police), 'at_home' or 'other'); Fjob - father's job (nominal: 'teacher', 'health' care related, civil 'services' (e.g. administrative or police), 'at_home' or 'other'); reason - reason to choose this school (nominal: close to 'home', school 'reputation', 'course' preference or 'other'); guardian - student's guardian (nominal: 'mother', 'father' or 'other'); traveltime - home to school travel time (numeric: 1 - <15 min., 2 - 15 to 30 min., 3 - 30 min. to 1 hour, or 4 - >1 hour); studytime - weekly study time (numeric: 1 - <2 hours, 2 - 2 to 5 hours, 3 - 5 to 10 hours, or 4 - >10 hours); failures - number of past class failures (numeric: n if 1<=n<3, else 4); schoolsup - extra educational support (binary: yes or no); famsup - family educational support (binary: yes or no); paid - extra paid classes within the course subject (Math or Portuguese) (binary: yes or no); activities - extra-curricular activities (binary: yes or no); nursery - attended nursery school (binary: yes or no); higher - wants to take higher education (binary: yes or no); internet - Internet access at home (binary: yes or no); romantic - with a romantic relationship (binary: yes or no); famrel - quality of family relationships (numeric: from 1 - very bad to 5 - excellent); freetime - free time after school (numeric: from 1 - very low to 5 - very high); goout - going out with friends (numeric: from 1 - very low to 5 - very high); Dalc - workday alcohol consumption (numeric: from 1 - very low to 5 - very high); Walc - weekend alcohol consumption (numeric: from 1 - very low to 5 - very high); health - current health status (numeric: from 1 - very bad to 5 - very good); absences - number of school absences (numeric: from 0 to 93); G1 - first period grade (numeric: from 0 to 20); G2 - second period grade (numeric: from 0 to 20); and G3 - final grade (numeric: from 0 to 20, output target). The models used in this project are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Adaboost, LGBM classifier, Gradient Boosting, and XGB classifier. Three feature scaling used in machine learning are raw, minmax scaler, and standard scaler. Finally, you will develop a GUI using PyQt5 to plot cross validation score, predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, decision boundaries, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy.
The data used in this project is the data published by Anurag Sharma about hotel reviews that were given by costumers. The data is given in two files, a train and test. The train.csv is the training data, containing unique User_ID for each entry with the review entered by a costumer and the browser and device used. The target variable is Is_Response, a variable that states whether the costumers was happy or not happy while staying in the hotel. This type of variable makes the project to a classification problem. The test.csv is the testing data, contains similar headings as the train data, without the target variable. The models used in this project are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Adaboost, LGBM classifier, Gradient Boosting, and XGB classifier, and LSTM. Three vectorizers used in machine learning are Hashing Vectorizer, Count Vectorizer, and TFID Vectorizer. Finally, you will develop a GUI using PyQt5 to plot cross validation score, predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy.
Book 1: BANK LOAN STATUS CLASSIFICATION AND PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING WITH PYTHON GUI The dataset used in this project consists of more than 100,000 customers mentioning their loan status, current loan amount, monthly debt, etc. There are 19 features in the dataset. The dataset attributes are as follows: Loan ID, Customer ID, Loan Status, Current Loan Amount, Term, Credit Score, Annual Income, Years in current job, Home Ownership, Purpose, Monthly Debt, Years of Credit History, Months since last delinquent, Number of Open Accounts, Number of Credit Problems, Current Credit Balance, Maximum Open Credit, Bankruptcies, and Tax Liens. The models used in this project are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Adaboost, LGBM classifier, Gradient Boosting, and XGB classifier. Three feature scaling used in machine learning are raw, minmax scaler, and standard scaler. Finally, you will develop a GUI using PyQt5 to plot cross validation score, predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, decision boundaries, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy. Book 2: OPINION MINING AND PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING WITH PYTHON GUI Opinion mining (sometimes known as sentiment analysis or emotion AI) refers to the use of natural language processing, text analysis, computational linguistics, and biometrics to systematically identify, extract, quantify, and study affective states and subjective information. This dataset was created for the Paper 'From Group to Individual Labels using Deep Features', Kotzias et. al,. KDD 2015. It contains sentences labelled with a positive or negative sentiment. Score is either 1 (for positive) or 0 (for negative). The sentences come from three different websites/fields: imdb.com, amazon.com, and yelp.com. For each website, there exist 500 positive and 500 negative sentences. Those were selected randomly for larger datasets of reviews. Amazon: contains reviews and scores for products sold on amazon.com in the cell phones and accessories category, and is part of the dataset collected by McAuley and Leskovec. Scores are on an integer scale from 1 to 5. Reviews considered with a score of 4 and 5 to be positive, and scores of 1 and 2 to be negative. The data is randomly partitioned into two halves of 50%, one for training and one for testing, with 35,000 documents in each set. IMDb: refers to the IMDb movie review sentiment dataset originally introduced by Maas et al. as a benchmark for sentiment analysis. This dataset contains a total of 100,000 movie reviews posted on imdb.com. There are 50,000 unlabeled reviews and the remaining 50,000 are divided into a set of 25,000 reviews for training and 25,000 reviews for testing. Each of the labeled reviews has a binary sentiment label, either positive or negative. Yelp: refers to the dataset from the Yelp dataset challenge from which we extracted the restaurant reviews. Scores are on an integer scale from 1 to 5. Reviews considered with scores 4 and 5 to be positive, and 1 and 2 to be negative. The data is randomly generated a 50-50 training and testing split, which led to approximately 300,000 documents for each set. Sentences: for each of the datasets above, labels are extracted and manually 1000 sentences are manually labeled from the test set, with 50% positive sentiment and 50% negative sentiment. These sentences are only used to evaluate our instance-level classifier for each dataset3. They are not used for model training, to maintain consistency with our overall goal of learning at a group level and predicting at the instance level. The models used in this project are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Adaboost, LGBM classifier, Gradient Boosting, and XGB classifier. Three feature scaling used in machine learning are raw, minmax scaler, and standard scaler. Finally, you will develop a GUI using PyQt5 to plot cross validation score, predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, decision boundaries, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy. Book 3: EMOTION PREDICTION FROM TEXT USING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING WITH PYTHON GUI In the dataset used in this project, there are two columns, Text and Emotion. Quite self-explanatory. The Emotion column has various categories ranging from happiness to sadness to love and fear. You will build and implement machine learning and deep learning models which can identify what words denote what emotion. The models used in this project are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Adaboost, LGBM classifier, Gradient Boosting, and XGB classifier. Three feature scaling used in machine learning are raw, minmax scaler, and standard scaler. Finally, you will develop a GUI using PyQt5 to plot cross validation score, predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, decision boundaries, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy. Book 4: HATE SPEECH DETECTION AND SENTIMENT ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING WITH PYTHON GUI The objective of this task is to detect hate speech in tweets. For the sake of simplicity, a tweet contains hate speech if it has a racist or sexist sentiment associated with it. So, the task is to classify racist or sexist tweets from other tweets. Formally, given a training sample of tweets and labels, where label '1' denotes the tweet is racist/sexist and label '0' denotes the tweet is not racist/sexist, the objective is to predict the labels on the test dataset. The models used in this project are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Adaboost, LGBM classifier, Gradient Boosting, XGB classifier, LSTM, and CNN. Three feature scaling used in machine learning are raw, minmax scaler, and standard scaler. Finally, you will develop a GUI using PyQt5 to plot cross validation score, predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, decision boundaries, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy. Book 5: TRAVEL REVIEW RATING CLASSIFICATION AND PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING WITH PYTHON GUI The dataset used in this project has been sourced from the Machine Learning Repository of University of California, Irvine (UC Irvine): Travel Review Ratings Data Set. This dataset is populated by capturing user ratings from Google reviews. Reviews on attractions from 24 categories across Europe are considered. Google user rating ranges from 1 to 5 and average user rating per category is calculated. The attributes in the dataset are as follows: Attribute 1 : Unique user id; Attribute 2 : Average ratings on churches; Attribute 3 : Average ratings on resorts; Attribute 4 : Average ratings on beaches; Attribute 5 : Average ratings on parks; Attribute 6 : Average ratings on theatres; Attribute 7 : Average ratings on museums; Attribute 8 : Average ratings on malls; Attribute 9 : Average ratings on zoo; Attribute 10 : Average ratings on restaurants; Attribute 11 : Average ratings on pubs/bars; Attribute 12 : Average ratings on local services; Attribute 13 : Average ratings on burger/pizza shops; Attribute 14 : Average ratings on hotels/other lodgings; Attribute 15 : Average ratings on juice bars; Attribute 16 : Average ratings on art galleries; Attribute 17 : Average ratings on dance clubs; Attribute 18 : Average ratings on swimming pools; Attribute 19 : Average ratings on gyms; Attribute 20 : Average ratings on bakeries; Attribute 21 : Average ratings on beauty & spas; Attribute 22 : Average ratings on cafes; Attribute 23 : Average ratings on view points; Attribute 24 : Average ratings on monuments; and Attribute 25 : Average ratings on gardens. The models used in this project are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Adaboost, LGBM classifier, Gradient Boosting, XGB classifier, and MLP classifier. Three feature scaling used in machine learning are raw, minmax scaler, and standard scaler. Finally, you will develop a GUI using PyQt5 to plot cross validation score, predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, decision boundaries, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy. Book 6: ONLINE RETAIL CLUSTERING AND PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING WITH PYTHON GUI The dataset used in this project is a transnational dataset which contains all the transactions occurring between 01/12/2010 and 09/12/2011 for a UK-based and registered non-store online retail. The company mainly sells unique all-occasion gifts. Many customers of the company are wholesalers. You will be using the online retail transnational dataset to build a RFM clustering and choose the best set of customers which the company should target. In this project, you will perform Cohort analysis and RFM analysis. You will also perform clustering using K-Means to get 5 clusters. The machine learning models used in this project to predict clusters as target variable are K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, LGBM, Gradient Boosting, XGB, and MLP. Finally, you will plot boundary decision, distribution of features, feature importance, cross validation score, and predicted values versus true values, confusion matrix, learning curve, performance of the model, scalability of the model, training loss, and training accuracy.
The purpose of this project is to develop a comprehensive Hate Speech Detection and Sentiment Analysis system using both Machine Learning and Deep Learning techniques. The project aims to create a robust and accurate system that can automatically identify hate speech in text data and perform sentiment analysis to determine the emotions and opinions expressed in the text. The project is designed to address the growing concern over the spread of hate speech and offensive content online. By implementing an automated detection system, it can help social media platforms, content moderators, and online communities to proactively identify and remove harmful content, fostering a safer and more inclusive online environment. Additionally, sentiment analysis plays a crucial role in understanding public opinions, customer feedback, and social media trends. By accurately predicting sentiment, businesses can make data-driven decisions, improve customer satisfaction, and gain valuable insights into consumer preferences. This project focuses on Hate Speech Detection and Sentiment Analysis using both Machine Learning and Deep Learning techniques. It begins with exploring the dataset, analyzing feature distributions, and predicting sentiment using Machine Learning models like Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Trees, Random Forests, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Light Gradient Boosting, and AdaBoost, while optimizing their performance through Grid Search for hyperparameter tuning. Subsequently, Deep Learning LSTM and 1D CNN models are implemented for sentiment analysis to capture long-term dependencies and local patterns in the text data. The project starts with exploring the dataset, understanding its structure, and analyzing the distribution of classes for hate speech and sentiment labels. This initial step allows us to gain insights into the dataset and potential challenges. After exploring the data, the distribution of text features, such as word frequency and sentiment scores, is analyzed to identify any patterns or biases that could impact the model's performance. The dataset is then divided into training, validation, and testing sets to evaluate the models' generalization capabilities. Early stopping techniques are utilized during training to prevent overfitting and enhance model generalization. Performance evaluation involves calculating metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score to gauge the models' effectiveness. Confusion matrices and visualizations provide further insights into model predictions and potential areas for improvement. A graphical user interface (GUI) is developed using PyQt to facilitate user interaction with the Hate Speech Detection and Sentiment Analysis system. Before training the Deep Learning models, the text data is tokenized and padded for uniform input sequences. The dataset is split into training and validation sets for model evaluation, and early stopping is used to prevent overfitting during training. The final system combines predictions from both Machine Learning and Deep Learning models to provide robust sentiment analysis results. The PyQt GUI allows users to input text and receive real-time sentiment analysis predictions. The LSTM and 1D CNN models, along with their optimized hyperparameters, are saved and deployed for future sentiment analysis tasks. Users can interact with the GUI, analyze sentiment in different texts, and provide feedback for continuous improvement of the Hate Speech Detection and Sentiment Analysis system.
This "Data Visualization, Time-Series Forecasting, and Prediction using Machine Learning with Tkinter" project is a comprehensive and multifaceted application that leverages data visualization, time-series forecasting, and machine learning techniques to gain insights into bitcoin data and make predictions. This project serves as a valuable tool for financial analysts, traders, and investors seeking to make informed decisions in the stock market. The project begins with data visualization, where historical bitcoin market data is visually represented using various plots and charts. This provides users with an intuitive understanding of the data's trends, patterns, and fluctuations. Features distribution analysis is conducted to assess the statistical properties of the dataset, helping users identify key characteristics that may impact forecasting and prediction. One of the project's core functionalities is time-series forecasting. Through a user-friendly interface built with Tkinter, users can select a stock symbol and specify the time horizon for forecasting. The project supports multiple machine learning regressors, such as Linear Regression, Decision Trees, Random Forests, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Lasso, Ridge, AdaBoost, and KNN, allowing users to choose the most suitable algorithm for their forecasting needs. Time-series forecasting is crucial for making predictions about stock prices, which is essential for investment strategies. The project employs various machine learning regressors to predict the adjusted closing price of bitcoin stock. By training these models on historical data, users can obtain predictions for future adjusted closing prices. This information is invaluable for traders and investors looking to make buy or sell decisions. The project also incorporates hyperparameter tuning and cross-validation to enhance the accuracy of these predictions. These models employ metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), which quantifies the average absolute discrepancy between predicted values and actual values. Lower MAE values signify superior model performance. Additionally, Mean Squared Error (MSE) is used to calculate the average squared differences between predicted and actual values, with lower MSE values indicating better model performance. Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), derived from MSE, provides insights in the same units as the target variable and is valued for its lower values, denoting superior performance. Lastly, R-squared (R2) evaluates the fraction of variance in the target variable that can be predicted from independent variables, with higher values signifying better model fit. An R2 of 1 implies a perfect model fit. In addition to close price forecasting, the project extends its capabilities to predict daily returns. By implementing grid search, users can fine-tune the hyperparameters of machine learning models such as Random Forests, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and AdaBoost Classifiers. This optimization process aims to maximize the predictive accuracy of daily returns. Accurate daily return predictions are essential for assessing risk and formulating effective trading strategies. Key metrics in these classifiers encompass Accuracy, which represents the ratio of correctly predicted instances to the total number of instances, Precision, which measures the proportion of true positive predictions among all positive predictions, and Recall (also known as Sensitivity or True Positive Rate), which assesses the proportion of true positive predictions among all actual positive instances. The F1-Score serves as the harmonic mean of Precision and Recall, offering a balanced evaluation, especially when considering the trade-off between false positives and false negatives. The ROC Curve illustrates the trade-off between Recall and False Positive Rate, while the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC-ROC) summarizes this trade-off. The Confusion Matrix provides a comprehensive view of classifier performance by detailing true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives, facilitating the computation of various metrics like accuracy, precision, and recall. The selection of these metrics hinges on the project's specific objectives and the characteristics of the dataset, ensuring alignment with the intended goals and the ramifications of false positives and false negatives, which hold particular significance in financial contexts where decisions can have profound consequences. Overall, the "Data Visualization, Time-Series Forecasting, and Prediction using Machine Learning with Tkinter" project serves as a powerful and user-friendly platform for financial data analysis and decision-making. It bridges the gap between complex machine learning techniques and accessible user interfaces, making financial analysis and prediction more accessible to a broader audience. With its comprehensive features, this project empowers users to gain insights from historical data, make informed investment decisions, and develop effective trading strategies in the dynamic world of finance. You can download the dataset from: http://viviansiahaan.blogspot.com/2023/09/data-visualization-time-series.html.
In the context of sentiment analysis and opinion mining, this project began with dataset exploration. The dataset, comprising user reviews or social media posts, was examined to understand the sentiment labels' distribution. This analysis provided insights into the prevalence of positive or negative opinions, laying the foundation for sentiment classification. To tackle sentiment classification, we employed a range of machine learning algorithms, including Support Vector, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbours Classiier, Decision Tree, Random Forest Classifier, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Light Gradient Boosting, and Adaboost Classifiers. These algorithms were combined with different vectorization techniques such as Hashing Vectorizer, Count Vectorizer, and TF-IDF Vectorizer. By converting text data into numerical representations, these models were trained and evaluated to identify the most effective combination for sentiment classification. In addition to traditional machine learning algorithms, we explored the power of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and their variant, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). LSTM is particularly adept at capturing contextual dependencies and handling sequential data. The text data was tokenized and padded to ensure consistent input length, allowing the LSTM model to learn from the sequential nature of the text. Performance metrics, including accuracy, were used to evaluate the model's ability to classify sentiments accurately. Furthermore, we delved into Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), another deep learning model known for its ability to extract meaningful features. The text data was preprocessed and transformed into numerical representations suitable for CNN input. The architecture of the CNN model, consisting of embedding, convolutional, pooling, and dense layers, facilitated the extraction of relevant features and the classification of sentiments. Analyzing the results of our machine learning models, we gained insights into their effectiveness in sentiment classification. We observed the accuracy and performance of various algorithms and vectorization techniques, enabling us to identify the models that achieved the highest accuracy and overall performance. LSTM and CNN, being more advanced models, aimed to capture complex patterns and dependencies in the text data, potentially resulting in improved sentiment classification. Monitoring the training history and metrics of the LSTM and CNN models provided valuable insights. We examined the learning progress, convergence behavior, and generalization capabilities of the models. Through the evaluation of performance metrics and convergence trends, we gained an understanding of the models' ability to learn from the data and make accurate predictions. Confusion matrices played a crucial role in assessing the models' predictions. They provided a detailed analysis of the models' classification performance, highlighting the distribution of correct and incorrect classifications for each sentiment category. This analysis allowed us to identify potential areas of improvement and fine-tune the models accordingly. In addition to confusion matrices, visualizations comparing the true values with the predicted values were employed to evaluate the models' performance. These visualizations provided a comprehensive overview of the models' classification accuracy and potential areas for improvement. They allowed us to assess the alignment between the models' predictions and the actual sentiment labels, enabling a deeper understanding of the models' strengths and weaknesses. Overall, the exploration of machine learning, LSTM, and CNN models for sentiment analysis and opinion mining aimed to develop effective tools for understanding public opinions. The results obtained from this project showcased the models' performance, convergence behavior, and their ability to accurately classify sentiments. These insights can be leveraged by businesses and organizations to gain a deeper understanding of the sentiments expressed towards their products or services, enabling them to make informed decisions and adapt their strategies accordingly.
In this project, we embarked on a comprehensive journey through the world of machine learning and model evaluation. Our primary goal was to develop a Tkinter GUI and assess various machine learning models on a given dataset to identify the best-performing one. This process is essential in solving real-world problems, as it helps us select the most suitable algorithm for a specific task. By crafting this Tkinter-powered GUI, we provided an accessible and user-friendly interface for users engaging with machine learning models. It simplified intricate processes, allowing users to load data, select models, initiate training, and visualize results without necessitating code expertise or command-line operations. This GUI introduced a higher degree of usability and accessibility to the machine learning workflow, accommodating users with diverse levels of technical proficiency. We began by loading and preprocessing the dataset, a fundamental step in any machine learning project. Proper data preprocessing involves tasks such as handling missing values, encoding categorical features, and scaling numerical attributes. These operations ensure that the data is in a format suitable for training and testing machine learning models. Once our data was ready, we moved on to the model selection phase. We evaluated multiple machine learning algorithms, each with its strengths and weaknesses. The models we explored included Logistic Regression, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Trees, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Support Vector Classifier (SVC). For each model, we employed a systematic approach to find the best hyperparameters using grid search with cross-validation. This technique allowed us to explore different combinations of hyperparameters and select the configuration that yielded the highest accuracy on the training data. These hyperparameters included settings like the number of estimators, learning rate, and kernel function, depending on the specific model. After obtaining the best hyperparameters for each model, we trained them on our preprocessed dataset. This training process involved using the training data to teach the model to make predictions on new, unseen examples. Once trained, the models were ready for evaluation. We assessed the performance of each model using a set of well-established evaluation metrics. These metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Accuracy measured the overall correctness of predictions, while precision quantified the proportion of true positive predictions out of all positive predictions. Recall, on the other hand, represented the proportion of true positive predictions out of all actual positives, highlighting a model's ability to identify positive cases. The F1-score combined precision and recall into a single metric, helping us gauge the overall balance between these two aspects. To visualize the model's performance, we created key graphical representations. These included confusion matrices, which showed the number of true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative predictions, aiding in understanding the model's classification results. Additionally, we generated Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) scores, which depicted a model's ability to distinguish between classes. High AUC values indicated excellent model performance. Furthermore, we constructed true values versus predicted values diagrams to provide insights into how well our models aligned with the actual data distribution. Learning curves were also generated to observe a model's performance as a function of training data size, helping us assess whether the model was overfitting or underfitting. Lastly, we presented the results in a clear and organized manner, saving them to Excel files for easy reference. This allowed us to compare the performance of different models and make an informed choice about which one to select for our specific task. In summary, this project was a comprehensive exploration of the machine learning model development and evaluation process. We prepared the data, selected and fine-tuned various models, assessed their performance using multiple metrics and visualizations, and ultimately arrived at a well-informed decision about the most suitable model for our dataset. This approach serves as a valuable blueprint for tackling real-world machine learning challenges effectively.
This project focuses on detecting cyberbullying tweets using both Machine Learning and Deep Learning techniques with a Python GUI implemented using PyQt. The first step involves data exploration, where the dataset is loaded and analyzed to gain insights into its structure and contents. Visualizations are created to understand the distribution of cyberbullying types and other features in the data. After data exploration, preprocessing is performed to clean and prepare the tweets for analysis. Text cleaning techniques, such as removing emojis, punctuation, links, and stop words, are applied to the tweet text. The data is then categorized based on the length of the tweets to facilitate further analysis. Next, the data is split into input and output variables, where the tweet text becomes the input feature (X) and the cyberbullying type becomes the output (y). The cyberbullying types are converted into numerical labels for ML models' compatibility. Machine Learning models are trained and evaluated using TF-IDF, Count Vectorizer, and Hashing Vectorizer as feature extraction techniques. SMOTE is applied to handle class imbalance, and the data is split into training and testing sets. Grid Search is utilized to find the best hyperparameters for ML models, optimizing their performance. Machine Learning models used are Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Trees, Random Forests, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Light Gradient Boosting. Moving to Deep Learning, LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) and 1D CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) models are constructed to detect cyberbullying types. The tweet text is embedded, and various layers are added to the models to extract meaningful features. The models are then compiled with appropriate loss functions and optimizers. The evaluation process is carried out using the test set for both Machine Learning and Deep Learning models. Metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score are used to assess the models' performance in detecting cyberbullying types. To enable easy access to the functionalities, a Graphical User Interface (GUI) is developed using PyQt. The GUI allows users to interact with the models and dataset easily. Users can select the feature extraction technique, choose the classifier, and initiate the model training process using the GUI's buttons and dropdown menus. For better data visualization, the GUI includes various plots, such as bar plots and pie charts, to show the distribution of cyberbullying types and other features. These visualizations help users understand the data and model performance intuitively. The final stage involves testing the GUI with different inputs and exploring model predictions on user-provided text. The GUI provides predictions for the given tweet text, indicating the likelihood of each cyberbullying type based on the trained models. Overall, this project combines data exploration, preprocessing, feature extraction using Machine Learning and Deep Learning models, GUI development, and data visualization to detect cyberbullying tweets effectively and provide an accessible interface for users to interact with the models. The end product allows users to analyze tweets for potential cyberbullying and contributes to promoting a safer and more respectful online environment.
This textbook presents an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of Natural Language Processing (NLP), from basic concepts to core algorithms and key applications. Further, it contains seven step-by-step NLP workshops (total length: 14 hours) offering hands-on practice with essential Python tools like NLTK, spaCy, TensorFlow Kera, Transformer and BERT. The objective of this book is to provide readers with a fundamental grasp of NLP and its core technologies, and to enable them to build their own NLP applications (e.g. Chatbot systems) using Python-based NLP tools. It is both a textbook and NLP tool-book intended for the following readers: undergraduate students from various disciplines who want to learn NLP; lecturers and tutors who want to teach courses or tutorials for undergraduate/graduate students on NLP and related AI topics; and readers with various backgrounds who want to learn NLP, and more importantly, to build workable NLP applications after completing its 14 hours of Python-based workshops.