Download Free Teoria Principalista De Los Derechos Sociales Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Teoria Principalista De Los Derechos Sociales and write the review.

Este estudio trata sobre los derechos sociales que se encuentran incorporados al catálogo de derechos fundamentales de las Constituciones. Como es bien sabido, la mayoría de las cláusulas constitucionales que pretenden garantizar derechos sociales están redactadas a través de formulaciones sucintas y con términos ambiguos o excesivamente vagos. Por eso, el interrogante que se plantea es si existe algún procedimiento de argumentación que permita justificar racionalmente su adjudicación judicial. Para responder a esta pregunta el autor partirá del marco teórico proporcionado por la teoría de los principios de Robert Alexy. La hipótesis central del libro es que existen dos grupos de argumentos que permiten fundamentar, como parte del significado de las cláusulas constitucionales, reglas de derecho social que justifican la toma de decisiones jurídicas: el primer grupo está integrado por aquellos argumentos basados en la interpretación del texto constitucional, en el uso de casos precedentes o análogos; el segundo grupo está integrado por aquellos argumentos que pueden ser sistematizados dentro del examen de proporcionalidad por omisión. Según los autores del prólogo, Laura Clérico y Jan-R. Sieckmann, "son varios los motivos que aconsejan la lectura de este libro: análisis minucioso, reflexión crítica, claridad y riqueza en la argumentación, relevancia práctica, profundidad teórica y originalidad. Se trata de una obra que no solo resulta de importancia para la academia interesada en la teoría y filosofía del derecho, la dogmática constitucional, de derechos humanos y de derecho comparado, sino también para los y las operadores/as jurídicos que se plantean el desafío cotidiano de contribuir al logro del goce efectivo de los derechos sociales".
Investigación sobre la doctrina general de los derechos fundamentales, su validez jurídico-constitucional y aborda el estudio de su teoría principialista. Examina los fundamentos normativos de España, Reino Unido y Estados Unidos en cuanto al método de la ponderación racional en el Derecho, los principios de proporcionalidad e igualdad, así como las competencias de control judicial y el pluralismo estructural de los derechos humanos, los cuales contribuyen a su protección y evitan su vulneración.
Constitutional law in Latin America embodies a mosaic of national histories, political experiments, and institutional transitions. No matter how distinctive these histories and transitions might be, there are still commonalities that transcend the mere geographical contiguity of these countries. This Handbook depicts the constitutional landscape of Latin America by shedding light on its most important differences and affinities, qualities and drawbacks, and by assessing its overall standing in the global enterprise of democratic constitutionalism. It engages with substantive and methodological conundrums of comparative constitutional law in the region, drawing meaningful comparisons between constitutional traditions. The volume is divided into two main parts. Part I focuses on exploring the constitutions for seventeen jurisdictions, offering a comprehensive country-by-country critique of the historical foundations, institutional architecture, and rights-based substantive identity of each constitution. Part II presents comparative analyses on the most controversial constitutional topics of the region, exploring central concepts in institutions and rights. The Oxford Handbook of Constitutional Law in Latin America is an essential resource for scholars and students of comparative constitutional law, and Latin American politics and history Written by leading experts, it comprehensively examines constitutions, controversies, institutions, and constitutional rights in Latin America.
The book focuses on Robert Alexy's theory of constitutional rights. Alexy systematically presented the theory in his seminal book Theorie der Grundrechte (1985; Engl. translation Theory of Constitutional Rights, 2002) and continued to develop it in numerous subsequent articles. Arguably still the most influential theory of constitutional rights, it has found widespread academic support, as well as recognition in several constitutional jurisdictions. On the other hand, it has also been the object of considerable criticism. The aim of this book is to outline the central aspects of Alexy's theory as he sees them, and to further develop the principles of constitutional, fundamental, and human rights by applying a constructive criticism of his theory.
This is the first book on the theory and practice of proportionality in Latin American constitutional law.
Comparative constitutionalism emerged in its current form against the backdrop of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War. As that backdrop recedes into the past, it is being replaced by a more multi-polar and confusing world, and the current state of the discipline of comparative constitutionalism reflects this fragmentation and uncertainty. This has opened up space for new, more varied, and increasingly critical voices seeking to improve the project of democratic constitutionalism. But it also raises questions: What of the past, if anything, is worth preserving? Which more recent parts should be defining of the field? In this context, this book asks which are - or should be - the canonical texts of comparative constitutionalism. The theoretical scope of the contributions is broad and ambitious, selecting primary material from beyond the existing textbooks to engage the concept of a canon. This framework provides significant insights about inclusion and exclusion, and proposes candidates for canonical and anti-canonical materials. The result is a wide-ranging discussion, among many voices, of how particular judgments and other primary texts have shaped or should shape our understanding of central elements of democratic constitutionalism from a comparative law perspective. This book is not a prescription of one universal understanding, but a broader conversation about the field and the future of constitutional democracy.
This book addresses the principle of proportionality, which is currently one of the most important instruments of judicial review, from both analytical and theory of law perspectives. As such, the analysis provided is far more comprehensive and can be applied to all areas of law, not just constitutional law. On the one hand, the volume offers a broad perspective on several aspects related to proportionality, such as its structure, the balancing methodology and the distinction between rules and principles. On the other, it provides an innovative, normativist and analytical approach to proportionality, helping readers understand its structure and behaviour.
This volume looks at how courts and the police handle racial discrimination in Europe. The chapters show that beyond legal technique, neither the legislators nor the judges escape from their own emotions when responding to racial discrimination. But, as the authors point out, emotions are not always negative. They can also help in a positive way in judicial interpretation. The study profiles five countries: Germany, UK, Estonia, Portugal and Spain. Each of these belong both to the European Union and to the Council of Europe. Coverage examines the responsibility of the public powers, more specifically of the legislative and judicial power, both of the police and of the judiciary, in persecuting racist behavior. In addition, the authors also consider the increase in racism in groups of citizens. The authors argue that racial justice is a proactive reinforcement of policies, practices, attitudes and actions that lead to equal access to opportunities for all. After reading this book, readers will gain a better understanding of the reasoning of legislators, police and judges when dealing with racial discrimination in Europe today.
Volume II: Special Workshops Initia Via Editora