Download Free Technical Report Of The Naep 1992 Trial State Assessment Program In Reading Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Technical Report Of The Naep 1992 Trial State Assessment Program In Reading and write the review.

A technical report that summarizes statistical methodology used in any survey or testing program in the United States. This report documents the design & data analysis procedures behind the 1992 Trial State Assessment in reading. It also provides insight into the rationale behind the technical decisions made about the program. The report contains numerous charts, tables, & graphs to simplify interpretation & analysis.
Highlighting the important innovations embodied in the 1992 National Assessment of Educational Progress' (NAEP) Reading Report Card, this report provides information on how the NAEP's large-scale reading assessment is evolving in response to changing perceptions of reading development and assessment procedures. Included in the report is an overview of the theoretical framework underlying the assessment, a description of and presentation of reading materials used in the assessment, a discussion of students' performance on constructed-response questions, and a presentation of example questions. Major findings discussed in the report include: (1) at grades 4, 8, and 12, students' average performance was highest on multiple choice questions, somewhat lower on short constructed-response questions, and lowest on extended-response questions; (2) the advantage of female students over male students in reading achievement was more evident for the short constructed-response questions than for multiple-choice questions, and the most evident for extended-response questions; and (3) when demonstrating comprehension of texts that they had selected from a compendium of seven short stories, eighth and twelfth graders demonstrated relative success in answering the constructed-response questions. Also included in the report are results of students' performance in reading for different purposes. Finally, two special studies conducted in 1992 are highlighted in the report--a literary selection task and a comparison of oral and written responses to comprehension questions. Contains 31 tables and five figures of data. A procedural appendix is attached. (RS)