Download Free Technical Assistance To The Republic Of Indonesia For Managing Regional Disparity In Economic And Poverty Reduction Programs Under Decentralization Phase 1 Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Technical Assistance To The Republic Of Indonesia For Managing Regional Disparity In Economic And Poverty Reduction Programs Under Decentralization Phase 1 and write the review.

This study uses a mixed of qualitative and quantitative analysis to answers these questions. Fieldworks were conducted in Jakarta and six districts in Java to collect official documents and interview people in institutions involved in the making and implementation of the PRSP. Analyses of the contents of documents and interviews were used to discuss how the synthesized factors such as policy characteristics and design, institutional mechanism, basic conditions, local capacity and political dynamics, as well as external factors such as technical assistance may influence how a policy being formulated and implemented, either from 'above' or 'below'. For the quantitative analysis, percentage change in local government budgets before and after decentralization were used as independent variables and poverty level and Human Development Index were used as dependent variables in multiple regression models to test a hypothesis that the increased fiscal capacity reduces poverty level and improves human development conditions in subsequent years.
African countries need to improve the performance of their public sectors if they are going to achieve their goals of growth, poverty reduction, and the provision of better services for their citizens. Between 1995 and 2004, the Bank provided some $9 billion in lending and close to $900 million in grants and administrative budget to support public sector capacity building in Africa. This evaluation assesses Bank support for public sector capacity building in Africa over these past 10 years. It is based on six country studies, assessments of country strategies and operations across the Region, and review of the work of the World Bank Institute, the Institutional Development Fund, and the Bank-supported African Capacity Building Foundation.
In 2004 the Indonesian government made a commitment to provide its entire population with health insurance coverage through a mandatory public health insurance scheme. It has moved boldly already provides coverage to an estimated 76.4 million poor and near poor, funded through the public budget. Nevertheless, over half the population still lacks health insurance coverage, and the full fiscal impacts of the government's program for the poor have not been fully assessed or felt. In addition, significant deficiencies in the efficiency and equity of the current health system, unless addressed will exacerbate cost pressures and could preclude the effective implementation of universal coverage (Ue and the desired result of improvements in population health outcomes and financial protection. For Indonesia to achieve UC, systems' performance must be improved and key policy choices with respect to the configuration of the health financing system must be made. Indonesia's health system performs well with respect to some health outcomes and financial protection, but there is potential for significant improvement. High-level political decisions are necessary on key elements of the health financing reform package. The key transitional questions to get there include: [ the benefits that can be afforded and their impacts on health outcomes and financial protection; [ how the more than 50 percent of those currently without coverage will be insured; [ how to pay medical care providers to assure access, efficiency, and quality; [ developing a streamlined and efficient administrative structure; [ how to address the current supply constraints to assure availability of promised services; [ how to raise revenues to finance the system, including the program for the poor as well as currently uninsured groups that may require government subsidization such as the more than 60 million informal sector workers, the 85 percent of workers in firms of less than five employees, and the 70 percent of the population living in rural areas.