Download Free Supporting Air And Space Expeditionary Forces Capabilities And Sustainability Of Air And Space Expeditionary Forces Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Supporting Air And Space Expeditionary Forces Capabilities And Sustainability Of Air And Space Expeditionary Forces and write the review.

The Department of Defense in recent years has shifted from threat-based planning to structuring its forces to provide a range of capabilities. As such, the need has arisen for new methods to assess the Air Force's manpower and materiel deployment capabilities. The authors outline a method for assessing Air and Space Expeditionary Force capabilities given certain policies and resource levels, and they illustrate how this method can contribute to the capabilities-based planning environment.
The Department of Defense in recent years has shifted from a focus on sizing and shaping its forces to meet specific war plans to policies based on capabilities that can be directed toward a spectrum of missions. Concurrently, the Air Force has developed new policies governing deployments. Under these policies, Air Force personnel and materiel are organized into Air and Space Expeditionary Forces (AEFs). The AEF policies specify which personnel are expected to deploy if they are needed at some time, how long those personnel will remain deployed, and when they will be expected to deploy again. This shift to capabilities-based planning and AEF deployments has dramatically changed the manner in which the Air Force organizes and deploys its forces. Given these changes, the need has arisen for new methods to assess Air Force deployment capabilities. This monograph describes a method for assessing deployment capabilities in light of the new AEF policies. This analytical approach can be used to evaluate a range of policy issues, which are described here, including expressing the deployment capabilities of the Air Force in terms of AEF policies, comparing alternative AEF policies with the current set of policies, sizing and balancing manpower positions among the combat support functional areas to meet specific deployment scenarios, and examining the impact of basing structures on the burden of deployment for Air Force personnel in certain support positions. Research for this report was completed in October 2004.
As part of a series on supporting the Air and Space Expeditionary Force, this report looks at the current operational architecture for incorporating combat support command and control (CSC2) and proposes an expanded architecture for the future.
The Air Force's transition from a threat-based to a capabilities-based planning posture suggests the need to calculate swiftly the manpower and equipment required to generate those capabilities. This book outlines just such a methodology for determining deployment requirements. The methodology employs a prototype research tool--the Strategic Tool for the Analysis of Required Transportation (START)--which generates lists of capability units required to support a user-specified operation. The appendix serves as a user's guide to the START program
Annotation. The Air Force's transition from a threat-based to a capabilities-based planning posture suggests the need to calculate swiftly the manpower and equipment required to generate those capabilities. This book outlines just such a methodology for determining deployment requirements. The methodology employs a prototype research tool--the Strategic Tool for the Analysis of Required Transportation (START)--which generates lists of capability units required to support a user-specified operation. The appendix serves as a user's guide to the START program.
During the past decade, the U.S. military has supported continuous deployments of forces around the world, often on very short notice and for prolonged duration, to meet the needs of a wide range of peacekeeping and humanitarian missions or major contingency operations. The pattern of varied and fast-breaking regional crises appears to be the model for the foreseeable future and has prompted the United States to reassess how it prepares, maintains, and employs its military forces. In response to this operating environment, the Air Force has reorganized into an Air and Space Expeditionary Force (AEF). The AEF concept divides the Air Force into 10 relatively equal groups (i.e., AEFs) of people and equipment. In any given 90-day period, two AEFs (or one AEF pair) are vulnerable to deployment to fulfill Air Force deployment requirements. The aim of this concept is to replace a permanent forward presence with forces that are primarily stationed in the continental United States (CONUS) and can be tailored rapidly, deployed quickly, employed immediately, and sustained indefinitely. These AEF global force projection goals present significant challenges to the current combat support (CS) system. CS is the collection of people, equipment, and processes that create, protect, and sustain air and space forces across the full range of military operations. In addition to the importance of CS, command and control (C2) has been identified as a key component of the AEF Agile Combat Support (ACS) system that needs further development. Joint doctrine defines C2 as the exercise of authority and direction by a properly designated commander over assigned and attached forces in the accomplishment of the mission. CSC2 thus, is the exercise of authority and direction over CS forces and resources to meet operational objectives. This work expands on the work of Leftwich et al., which presented initial concepts for guiding the development of a CSC2 operational architecture for the AEF.
This research brief summarizes improvements and shortfalls of the Air Force's combat support command and control (CSC2) architecture and recommends further improvements that will be integral to its continued success.
This report addresses support of emerging Air Force employment strategies associated with Expeditionary Aerospace Forces (EAFs). Although much work remains to define these new responsibilities and prepare Air Force units to meet them, it is clear that the EAF concepts will play a central role in the future Air Force. FAF concepts turn on the premise that rapidly tailorable, quickly deployable, immediately employable, and highly effective air and space force packages can serve as a viable substitute for permanent forward presence in both the strategic and the tactical arenas. Success of the EAF will, to a great extent, depend on the effectiveness and efficiency of the Agile Combat Support (ACS) system.