Download Free Strategic Communications In Russia Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Strategic Communications In Russia and write the review.

This book serves as a reader exploring the scholarly inquiry, professional education, and practice of Russian public relations and advertising in multiple contexts. It examines significant parts of what can be encompassed under the umbrella of strategic communications, including public relations and advertising, rather than investigating all areas of communication in Russia. Within the context of Russia’s history, culture, and ideology, the book begins by tracing the development of communication as a field, as a discipline, and as a social institution in Russia. It then samples current studies in Russian strategic communications, examining this professional specialization’s current state and likely future directions. The book’s authors are mostly Russians who are experts in their specializations. Chapters are predicated upon the premise that this is an exciting time of great opportunity for Russian strategic communications. However, in Russia, exploiting such opportunities for strategic communications scholarship, education, and professional practice presents challenges within the context of that nation’s cultural, historical, and ideological heritage that presently may be unique. The book concludes with a prognosis of the future of Russian strategic communications. The book is recommended reading for a worldwide audience of strategic communications scholars, educators, students, and practitioners. Such readers will find the book of interest and of unique value as the book will help them to better understand, appreciate, and respect Russian strategic communications, its genesis, and present state.
This research examined contemporary trends in the U.S. strategic communications industry and the perceptions of Russia positioning by the U.S. communications professionals to develop recommendations for the Russian government and corporate entities on their positioning in the U.S. The following research questions were studied within the framework of this research: a) what components of communications strategies of the U.S. corporate and government sectors are the most efficient? b) what are the opportunities and threats of the Russia brand in terms of communications? C) what strategic communication tools will be recommended to Russian companies and the government? In-depth interviews with strategic communications professionals are the core element of the study and a method that provides personal accounts of work on reputation building in the U.S. The sampling method is criterion sampling: respondents had to meet the requirement of the number of years of professional activity in strategic communications field (over 10 years of experience), track record of working with large U.S. companies (over 500 employees) and "weight" in the industry (interviews, speeches at industry conferences, etc.) At least half of the interviewees have a substantial professional experience dealing with Russian companies either in Russia or the U.S. This research project uncovered a massive shift away from the mainstream media in the agenda - setting process, which significantly reduced the monopoly that the U.S. mainstream media always had in foreign news. Communications industry is integrating with advertising, market research and other industries while communications channels are diversifying in delivering key messages through paid, earned, shared and owned media ("PESO" model). Agenda is no longer set just by the media, and any consumer of information, as well any entity, including companies and foreign governments, can influence the agenda-setting process, or set the agenda individually. The role of research and technology innovators has become crucial in strategic communications. The Russian government and companies, however, do not use these new developments. It appears to the U.S. communications professionals that Russia makes no sustained effort in the U.S. to position itself, has no brand and proposition to offer, but has tremendous opportunities for "selling its case" at the moment.
“This book is a timely reminder of the ties that join Russia and the European Union and the opportunities that still exist to improve a troubled relationship. The book does not shy away from the difficulties that the relationship currently faces, but seeks to find opportunities in these obstacles that could lead to improvements. With the voice of Russian scholars fully audible in this excellent collection of essays, this book provides an excellent opportunities for English-speaking audiences to learn more about this complex relationship.”Victor Bulmer-Thomas, Chatham House, UK “The thinking of Evgeny Pashentsev in this volume presents an enlightening analysis and synthesis of the integration of the political, social, cultural and technological advances around the globe with respect to their impact on EU-Russia relations. His chapters are a must read for both scholars and strategic consultants who seek to understand the future of the paradigm shift taking place in these countries.”Bruce I. Newman, DePaul University, USA, and Founding Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Political Marketing In this book the international team of EU, Russian and US researchers focus on the dangerous challenges of the current unstable international equilibrium and opportunities of the breakthrough for a better future. Eight chapters engage with a variety of issues, ranging from general tendencies and controversies in EU–Russia strategic communication and its political and economic aspects to reputation management of Russian companies in the EU and the psychological aspect of US sanctions in EU-Russia relations. Analyzing the security dimension, the authors focus on the geopolitical threats, opportunities and risks of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cyborgization and human genetics.
Bachelor Thesis from the year 2022 in the subject Communications - Media and Politics, Politic Communications, grade: 2,0, Free University of Berlin, language: English, abstract: Presented here is a comprehensive analysis of the Russian Twitter strategy in the Russia-Ukraine war, based on sampling and from the perspective of framing theories. This bachelor thesis documents the analysis of Russia's Twiplomacy in the Russia-Ukraine war concerning the framing approach. For this purpose, the posts of a selection of seven Russian government profiles on Twitter are examined over a period of five months. Examining Russian Twiplomacy provides a deeper understanding of its function. This study contributes to our understanding of the use of social media as a tool for strategic communication. The concrete implementation of the Russian strategy and the adjustments to the changing situation should be evident from the study material. The analysis of frames offers the possibility of recognizing the intention of the communicators. That offers opportunities to counteract influence and to identify communication goals for further clarification and negotiation.
"Recent events in Eastern Europe have raised serious concerns over the security situation on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) eastern flank. Russia’s activities which shaped and enabled a successful annexation of Crimea with barely a shot being fired in 2014 were actually quite remarkable and forced NATO, and certainly non-NATO members in the region, to take notice. Russian influence activities should be regarded as a primary threat to the peace, security, and stability of Eastern European nations as these activities seek to manipulate information in a manner that distorts facts and confuses audiences, which then leads to decisions and actions taken that are often not rational; NATO’s strategic communication (StratCom) should be seen as a comprehensive tool for meeting this security challenge and shaping a future security environment. Enhanced capabilities within the areas of social sciences to define and assess target audiences and promulgate messaging through media outlets, as well as enhanced development of the StratCom Center of Excellence (StratCom CoE) are critical to NATO’s StratCom campaign as it seeks to leverage soft power on the European continent and further afield. This paper asks what are the implications for NATO’s StratCom given Russia’s current actions with regards to influence activities in former Soviet Republics? Influence activities that make use of social sciences to identify and assess target audiences for multiple media outlet messaging is a facet of the hybrid tactics Russia uses to shape environments, and must be given high importance for NATO’s success in the battle of the narratives. If NATO wants to “keep the moral high ground” through a strategic communication policy that is open and transparent, then additional personnel with extensive backgrounds in psychology, sociology, and anthropology are important elements. In the battle for the narratives, it is far more important to understand how people think, versus what they think. In understanding the how, we can influence the what"--Abstract.
Russian public diplomacy attracts growing attention in the current global climate of tension and competition. However, it is often not understood or is misunderstood. Although some articles and book chapters exist, there are almost no books on Russian public diplomacy neither in Russian, nor in English. This edited collection is an in-depth and broad analysis of Russian public diplomacy in its conceptual understanding and its pragmatic aims and practice. Various aspects of Russian public diplomacy – from cultural to business practices – will interest professors, students and practitioners from various countries. Written by a diverse collection of the most prominent and capable scholars, from academia to international organizations, with a wealth of knowledge and objective experience, this book covers the vital topics and thoroughly analyzes the best practices and mistakes within the broad understanding of public diplomacy conducted by the Russian Federation.
Since the start of the Trump era, the United States and the Western world has finally begun to wake up to the threat of online warfare and the attacks from Russia, who flood social media with disinformation, and circulate false and misleading information to fuel fake narratives and make the case for illegal warfare. The question no one seems to be able to answer is: what can the West do about it? Central and Eastern European states, including Ukraine and Poland, however, have been aware of the threat for years. Nina Jankowicz has advised these governments on the front lines of the information war. The lessons she learnt from that fight, and from her attempts to get US congress to act, make for essential reading. How to Lose the Information War takes the reader on a journey through five Western governments' responses to Russian information warfare tactics - all of which have failed. She journeys into the campaigns the Russian operatives run, and shows how we can better understand the motivations behind these attacks and how to beat them. Above all, this book shows what is at stake: the future of civil discourse and democracy, and the value of truth itself.
This book is about media transparency and good-faith attempts of honesty by both the sources and the gate-keepers of news and other information that the mass media present as being unbiased. Specifically, this book provides a theoretical framework for understanding media transparency and its antithesis--media opacity--by analyzing extensive empirical data that the authors have collected from more than 60 countries throughout the world. The practice of purposeful media opacity, which exists to greater or lesser extents worldwide, is a powerful hidden influencer of the ostensibly impartial media gate-keepers whose publicly perceived role is to present news and other information based on these gate-keepers’ perception of this information’s truthfulness. Empirical data that the authors have collected globally illustrate the extent of media opacity practices worldwide and note its pervasiveness in specific regions and countries. The authors examine, from multiple perspectives, the complex question of whether media opacity should be categorically condemned as being universally inappropriate and unethical or whether it should be accepted—or at least tolerated—in some situations and environments.