Download Free Reform Of The Mexican Health System Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Reform Of The Mexican Health System and write the review.

Understood as a benefit derived from social security, healthcare provision was historically developed in Mexico within the context of labor laws and tied to the multiple social security institutions (SSIs) created throughout the first half of the twentieth century. However, the combination of an increase in informal unemployment, lack of institutional fiscal frameworks to support revenue raising, and political-economic aspects led to the development of a three-tiered system with financing and healthcare delivery practically independent from each other: 1) public health services provided by the various social-security institutions to the SSI-affiliated population, 2) public Ministry of Health (MoH) delivery for the population without affiliation to SSIs (nonSSI population) and 3) an increasingly growing private sector that complements the public health system's inability to meet population needs.During the past three decades, Mexico adopted multiple health reforms targeting the nonSSI tier with the aim of reducing inequities that result from financial and healthcare delivery fragmentation across the two tiers of the public healthcare system. These reforms included changes to health financing, workforce and shifted the fiscal attributions between states and the central government. While there exists abundant evidence on the consequences of these reforms on health system performance of the public non-SSI tier, two issues remain unexplored. First, the variation of these effects across the 32 Mexican states. Second, the absence of studies in the private sector even when almost half of national total health spending is financed through private funds.In this context, this dissertation aims to assess the participation of the private sector in health financing and workforce for the non-SSI tier of the Mexican healthcare system. To do so, it carries out three empirical studies with different research designs and data sources.The first study uses a cross-sectional design and data from an individual-level survey of adults from four Latin American countries in 2014; Mexico, El Salvador, Colombia and Brazil to investigate the association between private insurance and financial protection. Results point out that countries that managed to integrate the social security and non-social security health tiers through changes in health financing arrangements, -Brazil and Colombia- are potentially better able to provide financial protection to their population than Mexico and El Salvador, which continue to face steeper integration challenges underpinned by their health financing arrangements.The second and third studies are sub-national analyses of the effect of public health spending for the non-SSI population on financial protection (study 2) and workforce (study 3). Study 2 uses a cross-sectional design (2018) to test if states that allocate a higher level of financial resources to health for the non-SSI population are better able to protect their population against financial burden. Overall, results point to an inverse relationship between public health spending and financial protection and that this is even more pronounced in states that allocate a higher share from their own revenues.Study 3 uses multiple available data sources to build 17-year panel (2004-2020) to investigate the effect of public health spending for the non-SSI on changes in the number of physicians working in public and private settings. Results show that the rate of nurses grew more than physicians during the period of study, particularly among those working in public settings. While public health spending on the non-SSI population contributed to increased public and private workforce, there are steep variations across states.This dissertation contributes to the discussion of central government-state relations as well as the interaction between public-private sectors in healthcare, since they can no longer be independently understood.
Ten years after the introduction of publically-funded universal health insurance, the Mexican health system finds itself at a critical juncture.
Understood as a benefit derived from social security, healthcare provision was historically developed in Mexico within the context of labor laws and tied to the multiple social security institutions (SSIs) created throughout the first half of the twentieth century. However, the combination of an increase in informal unemployment, lack of institutional fiscal frameworks to support revenue raising, and political-economic aspects led to the development of a three-tiered system with financing and healthcare delivery practically independent from each other: 1) public health services provided by the various social-security institutions to the SSI-affiliated population, 2) public Ministry of Health (MoH) delivery for the population without affiliation to SSIs (non-SSI population) and 3) an increasingly growing private sector that complements the public health system's inability to meet population needs. During the past three decades, Mexico adopted multiple health reforms targeting the non-SSI tier with the aim of reducing inequities that result from financial and healthcare delivery fragmentation across the two tiers of the public healthcare system. These reforms included changes to health financing, workforce and shifted the fiscal attributions between states and the central government. While there exists abundant evidence on the consequences of these reforms on health system performance of the public non-SSI tier, two issues remain unexplored. First, the variation of these effects across the 32 Mexican states. Second, the absence of studies in the private sector even when almost half of national total health spending is financed through private funds. In this context, this dissertation aims to assess the participation of the private sector in health financing and workforce for the non-SSI tier of the Mexican healthcare system. To do so, it carries out three empirical studies with different research designs and data sources. The first study uses a cross-sectional design and data from an individual-level survey of adults from four Latin American countries in 2014; Mexico, El Salvador, Colombia and Brazil to investigate the association between private insurance and financial protection. Results point out that countries that managed to integrate the social security and non-social security health tiers through changes in health financing arrangements, -Brazil and Colombia- are potentially better able to provide financial protection to their population than Mexico and El Salvador, which continue to face steeper integration challenges underpinned by their health financing arrangements. The second and third studies are sub-national analyses of the effect of public health spending for the non-SSI population on financial protection (study 2) and workforce (study 3). Study 2 uses a cross-sectional design (2018) to test if states that allocate a higher level of financial resources to health for the non-SSI population are better able to protect their population against financial burden. Overall, results point to an inverse relationship between public health spending and financial protection and that this is even more pronounced in states that allocate a higher share from their own revenues. Study 3 uses multiple available data sources to build 17-year panel (2004-2020) to investigate the effect of public health spending for the non-SSI on changes in the number of physicians working in public and private settings. Results show that the rate of nurses grew more than physicians during the period of study, particularly among those working in public settings. While public health spending on the non-SSI population contributed to increased public and private workforce, there are steep variations across states. This dissertation contributes to the discussion of central government-state relations as well as the interaction between public-private sectors in healthcare, since they can no longer be independently understood.
?This academic but passionate and controversial work should be read by specialists on Mexico and Latin America, as well as by those interested in healthcare and social policy in general.??Carmelo Mesa-Lago, University of PittsburghHas Mexico, twenty years after beginning the process of decentralizing its health system, realized the anticipated benefits of increased community participation and improvements in efficiency and quality? Addressing this question, Decentralizing Health Services in Mexico presents a thorough historical and theoretical grounding, as well as representative case studies of decentralization at the state and local levels.The authors combine qualitative and quantitative data in their examination of the transfer of authority over fiscal, human, and physical resources in the health sector. The result is a major contribution to the ongoing debate over the advantages and disadvantages of decentralization in varying political, cultural, and economic contexts.Nuria Homedes is associate professor at the University of Texas School of Public Health-Houston. Antonio Ugalde is emeritus professor at the Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin. CONTENTS: Decentralization: Theory and History. Decentralization: The Long Road from Theory to Practice?the Editors. Decentralization of Health Services in Mexico: A Historical Review?the Editors. The First Attempt, 1983-1988. Decentralizing Health Services: Formulation, Implementaion, and Results?M. Gonzalez-Block, R. Leyva, O. Zapta, R. Loewe, and J. Alagon. Federalist Flirtations: The Politics and Execution of Health Services Decentralization for the Uninsured in Mexico, 1985-1995?A.-E. Birn. Trying Again, 1994-2004: Case Studies from Five States. ?Decentralized? in Quotes: Baja California Sur, 1996-2000?L. Olvera Santana. The Slow and Difficult Institutionalization of Health Care Reform in Sonora: 1982-2000?R. Abrantes Pego. Guanajuato: Invisible Results?S. Arjonilla Alday. Nuevo Leon and Tamaulipas: Opening and Closing a Window of Opportunity?the Editors. Decentralization at the Health District Level in Nuevo Leon?the Editors. Conclusions?the Editors.
This book provides a multi-disciplinary framework for developing and analyzing health sector reforms, based on the authors' extensive international experience. It offers practical guidance - useful to policymakers, consultants, academics, and students alike - and stresses the need to take account of each country's economic, administrative, and political circumstances. The authors explain how to design effective government interventions in five areas - financing, payment, organization, regulation, and behavior - to improve the performance and equity of health systems around the world.
The struggle of Mexicans to secure quality health care is the focal point of this study. Large-scale transformations in Mexico's national health care system have resulted in budget cuts, increased user fees and decreased public services. At the local level community-based health groups that practice popular medicine are addressing the challenge by training health promoters in a variety of preventive and healing practices and offering low-cost services in community clinics. Their health care approach integrates local and global practices ranging from Mexican herbalism to Chinese medicine. Suzanne Schneider's ethnographic study of grassroots health groups in Morelos, Mexico, addresses the lives of the participants and the groups' contributions to community health. What draws women to these groups? Are they reacting to their experiences with formal health care? To what extent are the groups' teachings applied in the household and accepted throughout the community? Does group participation offer women new sources of empowerment or avenues to income generation? Does the government support these groups? How do they fit into larger trends of health care reform and the shift toward privatization? Taking a political economic approach, Schneider examines the conditions under which community-based health groups are emerging and explores the ways different constituencies address health dilemmas. She delineates future roles for new participants in health care, new models of community health, and a new medical pluralism.
Reshaping Health Care in Latin America: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care Reform in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico
The Mexican health system has evolved through three generations of reform. The creation of the Ministry of Health and the main social security agency in 1943 marked the first generation of health reforms. In the late 1970s, a second generation of reforms was launched around the primary health-care model. Third-generation reforms favour systemic changes to reorganise the system through the horizontal integration of basic functions -- stewardship, financing, and provision. The stability of leadership in the health sector is emphasised as a key element that allowed for reform during the past 60 years. Furthermore, there has been a transition in the second generation of reforms to a model that is increasingly based on evidence; this has been intensified and extended in the third generation of reforms. We also examine policy developments that will provide social protection in health for all. These developments could be of interest for countries seeking to provide their citizens with universal access to health care that incorporates equity, quality, and financial protection.