Download Free Reasons For Decision In The Matter Of Transcanada Pipelines Limited Nova Gas Transmission Ltd And Foothills Pipe Liness Ltd Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Reasons For Decision In The Matter Of Transcanada Pipelines Limited Nova Gas Transmission Ltd And Foothills Pipe Liness Ltd and write the review.

On 1 September 2011, TransCanada PipeLines Limited (TransCanada), NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. (NOVA or NGTL) and Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. (Foothills) applied to the Board under Parts I and IV of the National Energy Board Act for approvals required to implement a proposed restructuring of the services on the TransCanada Mainline pipeline system (Mainline), the TransCanada Alberta System (Alberta System) and the TransCanada Foothills System (Foothills System). TransCanada also applied for orders fixing and approving tolls that it shall charge for transportation services provided on the Mainline between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013.--Document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Alliance Pipeline Ltd., Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc., Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd., Kinder Morgan Cochin ULC, NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd., Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC on Behalf of Trans Mountain LP, Trans Québec and Maritimes Pipeline Inc., TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd., TransCanada PipeLines Limited, Trans-Northern Pipelines Inc., and Westcoast Energy Inc., Carrying on Business as Spectra Energy Transmission

Canada. National Energy Board

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 128


Get eBook

In early 2008, the National Energy Board (Board or NEB) identified a proposed approach for the Land Matters Consultative Initiative (LMCI), consisting of four distinct topic streams. One of the streams, Stream 3, was Pipeline Abandonment--Financial Issues. The Board indicated that the key issue to be considered in respect of that stream was: "What is the optimal way to ensure that funds are available when abandonment costs are incurred?" The Board noted two key principles fundamental to its future decisions with respect to the financial matters related to pipeline abandonment. These were: a) Abandonment costs are a legitimate cost of providing service and are recoverable upon Board approval from users of the system; and b) Landowners will not be liable for costs of pipeline abandonment. These Reasons for Decision provide an overview of the matters considered by the Board in reaching a decision in respect of the abandonment cost estimates applications.--Document.
In January 2008, the National Energy Board (Board) identified a proposed approach for the Land Matters Consultative Initiative (LMCI), consisting of four distinct topic streams. One of the four topic streams, stream 3, was "Pipeline Abandonment--Financial Issues." The Board indicated that the key issue to be considered in respect of that topic stream was the following: What is the optimal way to ensure that funds are available when abandonment costs are incurred? This document presents the Board's report and recommendations concerning this question.--Includes text from document.
"An index and document delivery service for Canadian report literature".