Download Free Reasons For Decision In The Matter Of Alliance Pipeline Ltd Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Reasons For Decision In The Matter Of Alliance Pipeline Ltd and write the review.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Alliance Pipeline Ltd., Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc., Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd., Kinder Morgan Cochin ULC, NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd., Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC on Behalf of Trans Mountain LP, Trans Québec and Maritimes Pipeline Inc., TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd., TransCanada PipeLines Limited, Trans-Northern Pipelines Inc., and Westcoast Energy Inc., Carrying on Business as Spectra Energy Transmission

Canada. National Energy Board

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 128


Get eBook

In early 2008, the National Energy Board (Board or NEB) identified a proposed approach for the Land Matters Consultative Initiative (LMCI), consisting of four distinct topic streams. One of the streams, Stream 3, was Pipeline Abandonment--Financial Issues. The Board indicated that the key issue to be considered in respect of that stream was: "What is the optimal way to ensure that funds are available when abandonment costs are incurred?" The Board noted two key principles fundamental to its future decisions with respect to the financial matters related to pipeline abandonment. These were: a) Abandonment costs are a legitimate cost of providing service and are recoverable upon Board approval from users of the system; and b) Landowners will not be liable for costs of pipeline abandonment. These Reasons for Decision provide an overview of the matters considered by the Board in reaching a decision in respect of the abandonment cost estimates applications.--Document.
The National Energy Board publishes reasons for decisions when it expects its decisions to influence actions beyond the particular case that was heard. The Board is an independent tribunal with responsibilities for regulating the oil, gas, and electricity industries. Its decisions affect the industry, energy consumers, and anyone who owns land or lives in the vicinity of pipeline and international power line rights of way. Its decisions aim to protect the public interest in safety, environmental protection, and economic efficiency. This document presents the decision of the National Energy Board regarding Alliance Pipeline Ltd.'s application in respect of its British Columbia Expansion Project.--Government of Canada's website.
The Alliance Pipeline System is a "bullet" line designed for transporting liquids-rich gas from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) to the Chicago market hub. On 22 May 2014, Alliance filed an application requesting orders and approvals necessary for Alliance to implement new services and related tolls and Tariff on the Alliance Pipeline, commencing 1 December 2015. This document presents information the application and decision, market power, commercial engagement, new services, toll design, seasonal and interruptible services, recoverable cost variance and abandonment surcharge, risk and reward, and compliance and future filings.--Includes text from document.
The National Energy Board publishes reasons for decisions when it expects its decisions to influence actions beyond the particular case that was heard. The Board is an independent tribunal with responsibilities for regulating the oil, gas, and electricity industries. Its decisions affect the industry, energy consumers, and anyone who owns land or lives in the vicinity of pipeline and international power line rights of way. Its decisions aim to protect the public interest in safety, environmental protection, and economic efficiency. This document presents the decision of the National Energy Board regarding TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd.'s application to construct and operate the Canadian portion of the Keystone pipeline project. News releases are included in English and French.--Government of Canada's website.
On 1 September 2011, TransCanada PipeLines Limited (TransCanada), NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. (NOVA or NGTL) and Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. (Foothills) applied to the Board under Parts I and IV of the National Energy Board Act for approvals required to implement a proposed restructuring of the services on the TransCanada Mainline pipeline system (Mainline), the TransCanada Alberta System (Alberta System) and the TransCanada Foothills System (Foothills System). TransCanada also applied for orders fixing and approving tolls that it shall charge for transportation services provided on the Mainline between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013.--Document.
The National Energy Board (NEB) held hearings in Saint John, New Brunswick during the week of 28 January 2008 in the matter of applications dated 12 July 2007 and 7 August 2007 by Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd., for approval of the Plans, Profiles, and Book of Reference respecting the detailed route for the Brunswick Pipeline Certificate GC-110 from the Canaport Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Terminal at Mispec Point, New Brunswick to a point on the US border near St. Stephen, New Brunswick. The issues considered during the Brunswick Pipeline Detailed Route Hearing included the best possible detailed route for the pipeline and the most appropriate methods and timing of constructing the pipeline. At the hearing the NEB considered objections from the following: Sierra Supplies Ltd.; Galbraith Construction Ltd. and Galbraith Equipment Co. Ltd.; Frederick Tuddenham; Melvin Hannan and Beatrice Latour; and Estate of A.J. Debly. This document is a compilation of the NEB decisions on each objection.--Includes text from publisher's website.