Download Free Plan For Collating The Statutes Preparatory To The Work Of Consolidation And Revision Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Plan For Collating The Statutes Preparatory To The Work Of Consolidation And Revision and write the review.

Excerpt from Plan for Collating the Statutes Preparatory to the Work of Consolidation and Revision: Containing the Report of the Chairman on a General Plan for the Consolidation and Classification of the Statutes and a Detailed Plan for Making a Card Record of the History and Substance of the Statutes of the State The act under which the Board of Statutory Consolidation was created provides that it shall be the duty of the board to direct and control the revision, simplification, arrangement and consolidation of the statutes of the state that the plan and scope of the work shall follow that adopted in the gen eral laws, so far as practicable; that the statutes shall not be changed in substance except that as to matters of pro cedure the board shall report for enactment such amendments as it may deem proper and necessary to condense and simplify the existing practice and as shall adapt the procedure to existing conditions and that the board in its final report shall suggest such contradictions, omission and imperfec tions as may appear in the original text, with the manner in which they have reconciled, amended or supplied the same. L. 1904 Ch. Before this work can be accomplished related provisions of statutory law must be brought together. It is impossible to collect them with any certainty of com pleteness from the indexes of any existing publications. Some °of the provisions are to be found in the general laws some in the codes and very many lie buried in the session laws. A consolidation and revision which relied upon editorial com pilatious of the statutes or indexes to the session laws to col lect kindred provisions would be incomplete as it would be impossible to know whether or not the entire field upon a particular subject had been covered. The plan outlined in this book is intended as the guide for collating the statutes for the work of actual consolidation and revision. It has been adopted as the best means for bringing together related statutory provisions preparatory to the performance of the task set before the board by the legislature. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
In this book, James R. Maxeiner takes on the challenge of demonstrating that historically American law makers did consider a statutory methodology as part of formulating laws. In the nineteenth century, when the people wanted laws they could understand, lawyers inflicted judge-made, statute-destroying, common law on them. Maxeiner offers the cure for common law, in the form of sensible statute law. Building on this historical evidence, Maxeiner shows how rule-making in civil law jurisdictions in other countries makes for a far more equitable legal system. Sensible statute laws fit together: one statute governs, as opposed to several laws that even lawyers have trouble disentangling. In a statute law system, lawmakers make laws for the common good in sensible procedures, and judges apply sensible laws and do not make them. This book shows how such a system works in Germany and would be a solution for the American legal system as well.
Volume contains: 236 NY 570 (Goodwin v. Lamport & Holt) 236 NY 22 (Gravenhorst v. Zimmermann) 236 NY 22 (Gravenhorst v. Zimmermann) 236 NY 554 (Hermitage Co. v. Goldfogle) 236 NY 554 (Hermitage Co. v. Goldfogle) 236 NY 553 (Moberg Co. v. Mohr) 236 NY 553 (Rablo Construction Co. v. Marek)