Download Free Perceptions Of Principal Leadership Behaviors Related To The Reading Program In Elementary Schools Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Perceptions Of Principal Leadership Behaviors Related To The Reading Program In Elementary Schools and write the review.

This guide to the 21 leadership responsibilities that influence student achievement will help school leaders focus on changes that really make a difference.
Describes a variety of leaders hip responsibilities that have an effect on student achievement.
The primary purpose of this study was to determine if relationships existed between the 21 instructional leadership behaviors identified by Marzano, Waters, and McNulty (2005) and elementary student academic achievement in the areas of reading, writing, and science as measured by the state accountability test (STAAR). A total of 25 principals representing 25 elementary school campuses completed the Adapted School Leadership Behaviors Survey (ASLBS). This survey was adapted from the School Leadership Behaviors Survey (SLBS) Schindler (2012) and used to assess principal self-perceptions of the 21 instructional leadership behaviors as they relate to campus student achievement. Correlational analyses were conducted to investigate the relationship between elementary school principals’ perception of their 21 instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement as measured by the state assessment (STAAR) Percent at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard or Above (Sum of All Grades Tested) in the subjects of reading, writing, and science. The findings of the study would suggest that there were some weak uphill (positive) relationships between the 21 instructional leadership behaviors and campus student achievement. However overall the correlations found could be described as having a range between no linear relationship and a moderate downhill (negative) relationship. For purposes of this study, correlations where -.30 ≤ r ≤.30 were deemed too small to discuss in detail but are included in the statistical tables for reference. Negative notable correlations were found between the instructional leadership behaviors of change agent, contingent rewards, flexibility, intellectual stimulation, involvement in curriculum and instruction optimizer, and outreach and one or more of the STAAR tested subjects of reading, writing, and science. Of all the positively correlated, none were statistically significant. The leadership behavior of Change Agent was negatively correlated to writing (r = -.518) and statistically significant (p=.008). The leadership behavior of Contingent Rewards was negatively correlated to science (r = -.412) and statistically significant (p=.041). The leadership behavior of Involvement in Curriculum was positively correlated to writing (r = -.419) and statistically significant (p=.037). These three leadership behaviors showed a moderate downhill (negative) relationship to campus academic achievement. Of the three correlations which were found to be negative and at a statistically significant level (p≤ .05), the greatest negative correlation found was where r = -.518 which is still a very small correlation. The sample size was such that relationships were found, but significance would not be generalizable.
Examines principals' and teachers' perceptions of principals' leadership behaviors and whether leadership behaviors impact student learning viewed through the lens of transformational leadership. Analyzes using mixed methods seven elementary schools in a medium size district in the central region of North Carolina. Addresses the factors that challenge principals as they provide leadership in their schools. Includes principal interviews and focus groups as qualitative data.
Abstract: Purpose. The purpose of this investigation of teacher's perceptions of principal's leadership behavior and student achievement (reading) was to explore those factors of principal's leader behaviors that differentiate low achieving and high achieving schools as perceived by teachers. Sample. Two hundred sixty-one teachers in seven selected northeast Ohio school district and seventeen buildings participated in this study. Teachers in this study had at least three years of experience and one or more years of supervision from the principals whose leadership behavior they described. Instrument. The revised Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire Form XII was used. This instrument measured only four subscales, consideration Initiating Structure, Persuasion and Superior Orientation. This instrument was used to explore answer to five research questions. Findings. The study results did not support the premise that the leader behavior task structure differentiated effective from ineffective schools. Teachers in both groups of schools perceived that principals exhibited this characteristic. However, the results revealed that the leader behavior, consideration, did differ at the .05 level of significance as perceived by teachers between principals in high and low achieving schools. The data also showed that discrepancy existed between principals self perception and teacher perceptions of the leader behavior, superior orientation at the .05 level of significance. The data also revealed that the level of staff involvement, such as awareness, implementation, and curricular focus was more evident in low achieving than in high achieving schools. Conclusion. The investigation concluded that there is substantial need for further exploration of the leadership variable. An important recommendation is that additional research be initiated using the LBDQ and other research instruments as a strategy to consistently operationalize the leadership characteristics of Effective Schools Movement.
The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine principals' perceptions of the effectiveness of their professional development as instructional leaders and their implementation of culturally responsive leadership practices. The literature review in this study indicated there was limited research on principals' professional development in literacy content knowledge and their implementation of culturally responsive leadership. The researcher interviewed twelve elementary school principals. These interviews measured their attitudes and confidence in making school-based decisions that improve literacy and create a more culturally responsive environment. This study also identified their readiness level to engage in decision-making around best ways to be more self-critical, analyze equity data and develop culturally responsive teachers and curriculum to impact student achievement and decrease disproportionality. This study was conducted using grounded theories of effective culturally responsive leadership practices as described by Muhammad Khalifa (2018). This study will contribute to the limited knowledge about principals' literacy content knowledge and their implementation of culturally responsive leadership practices. This study concluded principals have not been provided with professional development on literacy content knowledge. This study also concluded principals are cognizant of what it means to be a culturally responsive leader, yet most have not implemented culturally responsive leadership practices in schools. It is recommended principals and participants in pre-service leadership programs receive professional development and courses, increasing their literacy content knowledge and understanding of culturally responsive leadership behaviors.