Download Free Peer Review In Nursing Practice Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Peer Review In Nursing Practice and write the review.

Peer Review in Nursing: Principles for a Successful Practice is the first nursing publication that approaches the definition and implementation strategies for peer review within an organizational setting. Using a professional model, with shared governance as a framework, the authors discuss the difference between manger initiated staff performance evaluation of the past and the true peer review aspects of professional practice for the future. This text follows in line with the Magnet program requiremet “that nurses at all levels use self appraisal performance review and peer review, including annual goal settings, for the assurance of competence and professional development” page 30 of the 2008 Magnet manual. This unique text teaches nurses the skills they need to demonstrate organizational processes, structures, and outcomes that help insure accountability, competence and autonomy.
Purpose: The purpose of this integrative literature review was to identify whether peer review improves nursing practice. Literature was reviewed, analyzed and synthesized to explore the implications peer review has on nursing practice. Design: Integrative review that included a review a quantitative and qualitative research studies and a review of literature that explored the practice of peer review. Methods: Articles published since 2009 that included information on peer review were critically evaluated and reviewed based on the Professional Nursing Standards of the American Nurses Association (ANA) and its definition of nursing peer review. Findings: From the available literature on peer review in nursing, ten studies were analyzed. The majority of the studies reviewed were within both the nursing field and the United States. Peer review was implemented in a variety of ways. Perceptions of peer review, implementation and implications of peer review were outlined in the analyzed studies. Constraints of peer review were lack of time and an inadequate number of staff to support the peer review process. Most participants desired to continue peer review after implementation and some used the process to sculpt future professional endeavors. Conclusions: The interpersonal nature of peer review can foster reflective practice. Communication and collaboration are essential when using peer review. Peer review is a reciprocal process and can facilitate learning from others. The use of standards when completing peer review can assist in measuring the quality of care. Relevance to Nursing Leadership: Understanding the process of peer review and the implications on nursing practice supports the Association Of Nurse Executive (AONE) competencies and the use of the Healthy Work Environment Standards of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN).
Pamphlet is a succinct statement of the ethical obligations and duties of individuals who enter the nursing profession, the profession's nonnegotiable ethical standard, and an expression of nursing's own understanding of its commitment to society. Provides a framework for nurses to use in ethical analysis and decision-making.
Revision of: Scope and standards of practice for nursing professional development. 2000.
The Future of Nursing explores how nurses' roles, responsibilities, and education should change significantly to meet the increased demand for care that will be created by health care reform and to advance improvements in America's increasingly complex health system. At more than 3 million in number, nurses make up the single largest segment of the health care work force. They also spend the greatest amount of time in delivering patient care as a profession. Nurses therefore have valuable insights and unique abilities to contribute as partners with other health care professionals in improving the quality and safety of care as envisioned in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) enacted this year. Nurses should be fully engaged with other health professionals and assume leadership roles in redesigning care in the United States. To ensure its members are well-prepared, the profession should institute residency training for nurses, increase the percentage of nurses who attain a bachelor's degree to 80 percent by 2020, and double the number who pursue doctorates. Furthermore, regulatory and institutional obstacles-including limits on nurses' scope of practice-should be removed so that the health system can reap the full benefit of nurses' training, skills, and knowledge in patient care. In this book, the Institute of Medicine makes recommendations for an action-oriented blueprint for the future of nursing.
Nurse peer review has long been recognized as a method of ensuring competence, safety, and quality patient care. There are currently no guidelines as to how to conduct nurse peer review and many hospitals struggle to implement an effective nurse peer review program. Many parallel quality review methods exist, including Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Serious Event Review (SER), but these mechanisms allow other disciplines to review and evaluate nursing practice, something they are not trained in nor competent to do. Nurses need their own venue for reviewing and evaluating nursing practice. The literature supports the use of nurse peer review, reporting positive benefits for nurses, patients, and organizations. This quality improvement project used a pilot study and Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) model to develop an incident-based nurse peer review program. The pilot study occurred over a three-week period during which clinical nurses attended three peer review sessions to evaluate nine cases of near misses and adverse events. Evaluation and feedback were sought at the end of each session. The resulting feedback was overwhelming positive, with clinical nurses reporting increased satisfaction with the peer review process and believing that the program would lead to improved nursing practice. The pilot study also resulted in the identification of several educational opportunities which were referred to the appropriate committees and departments. Minor revisions were made over the three sessions, resulting in a program to be implemented at the organizational level.