Download Free Macroprudential Frameworks Implementation And Relationship With Other Policies Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Macroprudential Frameworks Implementation And Relationship With Other Policies and write the review.

Emerging market central banks have a long history of using macroprudential instruments. But while most central banks carry a heavy responsibility for financial stability, legal objectives are generally vague, do not define success or failure, and say nothing about competing objectives. This complicates both accountability and the communication of macroprudential decisions. Participants drew several lessons from their experience with implementing macroprudential instruments. First, macroprudential authorities need to act early if they want to address systemic risk effectively. Second, building buffers or shifting the composition of credit is easier than managing the cycle. Third, macroprudential measures tend to be better at constraining booms than at dampening busts. Fourth, although macroprudential tools could, in principle, be targeted very precisely, circumvention by lenders and borrowers require more broad-based approaches. Fifth, macroprudential measures and monetary policy can reinforce each other when used in the same direction. Sixth, the jury is still out whether macroprudential instruments could be used effectively to address regional disparities within economies. This volume collects the background papers of a meeting of Deputy Governors of central banks from emerging market economies to exchange their experience with designing macroprudential frameworks and implementing macroprudential instruments.
Macroprudential tools were actively used in India long before the onset of the global financial crisis. The regulatory tools, and the power to activate them, reside with sectoral authorities, while the Financial Stability and Development Council is the apex body concerned with financial stability. Its Sub-Committee has taken on the role of finalising broad-based macroprudential policies and tools. As India is a bankdominated economy, and the Reserve Bank of India regulates banks, non-bank financial companies and most other important segments of the financial markets, the Bank is the main centre for macroprudential analysis. This paper documents the successful implementation of various macroprudential tools such as provisioning, risk weights, loan-to-value ratios and capital flow measures. We also highlight the coordinated use of macroprudential and monetary policies in response to changes in the macro-financial environment before and after the crisis. Lastly, the analytical approaches to systemic risk assessment in India, together with the use of communication as a policy tool, are discussed.Full Publication: 'http://ssrn.com/abstract=3101163' Macroprudential Frameworks, Implementation and Relationship with Other Policies.
This note outlines the South African Reserve Bank's proposed framework for achieving its new financial stability mandate. It sets out the institutional structure, the focus and objectives of macroprudential policy and the decision-making process to be applied. It identifies and describes three important stages in the process of implementing macroprudential policy, namely completing a systemic risk assessment, building a case for macroprudential intervention, and selecting and applying the macroprudential instruments. Full Publication: 'http://ssrn.com/abstract=3101163' Macroprudential Frameworks, Implementation and Relationship with Other Policies.
Given the increasing complexity and interconnectedness of the financial system, central banks have broadened their mandates and policy toolkit to address emerging risks to financial stability. This paper describes Malaysia's experience in establishing its macroprudential framework. It highlights the institutional and governance arrangements made to support decision-making, and policy formulation to avert or reduce risks to financial stability. It also discusses the importance of coordinating different policy tools, such as monetary, macroprudential and fiscal measures, to balance policy trade-offs. Drawing on Malaysia's experience in implementing household- and property-related macroprudential measures, the paper argues that recalibration of existing policies hinges on the objectives and circumstances of individual jurisdictions.Full Publication: 'http://ssrn.com/abstract=3101163' Macroprudential Frameworks, Implementation and Relationship with Other Policies.
Emerging market central banks have a long history of using macroprudential instruments. In the aftermath of the Asian crisis, central banks in the region deployed macroprudential tools first to deal with the fallout of crisis and then to prevent vulnerabilities from building up again. Similarly, central banks in Latin America and other regions used macroprudential tools to prevent large swings in external financing from turning into domestic financial booms and busts.This volume collects the background papers of a meeting of Deputy Governors of central banks from emerging market economies (EMEs), who met in Basel in February 2017 to exchange their experience with designing macroprudential frameworks and implementing macroprudential instruments. The volume includes country notes prepared by participating central banks, as well as the background papers by the BIS.Full Publication: 'http://ssrn.com/abstract=3101163' Macroprudential Frameworks, Implementation and Relationship with Other Policies.
We use questionnaire responses as well as new data sets to assess the deployment and effectiveness of macroprudential instruments for a sample of emerging market economies. First, we highlight the challenges that authorities face in the measurement of financial stability and systemic risk, the “ultimate objective” of macroprudential frameworks. We argue that these challenges naturally extend to measuring “macroprudential policy stance”. Second, we document the “inaction bias” for our sample of EM economies and highlight the limited use of numerous instruments that authorities have in their toolkits. Third, we discuss and provide some evidence that governance frameworks, especially the role of central banks, may be relevant for both implementation and outcomes. Fourth, we infer from questionnaires that macroprudential tools are commonly tailored for specific sectors (especially the property sector), regions and institutions. Finally, we provide some evidence that macroprudential measures, indeed, have an impact on a number of financial risk indicators.Full Publication: 'http://ssrn.com/abstract=3101163' Macroprudential Frameworks, Implementation and Relationship with Other Policies.
Papers in this volume wer ...
In Korea, the authorities responsible for financial stability carry out their respective roles under their individual purviews. Macroprudential (financial stability) policy is conducted by sharing views about financial stability conditions and responding jointly in times of crisis through various channels for cooperation. The macroprudential policy instruments currently used in Korea include loan-to-value and debt-to-income regulations, countercyclical capital buffers, regulation of the domestic currency loanto-deposit ratio (LDR), and FX-related macroprudential measures (the Macroprudential Stability Levy and leverage caps on banks' FX derivatives positions). The Bank of Korea (BOK) was given responsibility for financial stability under the revised Bank of Korea Act (which took effect in 2011). To this end, the Bank pre-emptively identifies potential risks in the financial system while conducting its monetary policy, as well as through its Financial Stability Report and Financial Stability Meetings. The BOK also shares its perceptions of financial conditions and responds jointly with the relevant government agencies at a macroprudential level. Full Publication: 'http://ssrn.com/abstract=3101163' Macroprudential Frameworks, Implementation and Relationship with Other Policies.
Our note has two related, albeit separate, goals. First, we extend an interest rate policy rule by appending a financial variable to it. Our key assumption is that the relationship between that financial variable and output is uncertain. This is an important assumption because policymakers seek policy rules that are robust to economic relationships. This exercise allows us to discuss a number of issues pertaining to the connection between macroprudential and monetary policies. Second, we examine some of the incentives faced by countries in coordinating their macroprudential policies and, thus, in working towards global financial stability, an international public good. We assume that the probability of a financial crisis decreases as more countries opt for coordination. Moreover, the heterogeneity of expected net benefits implies that countries' willingness to coordinate differs. While coordination to achieve financial stability faces important challenges, it can be socially optimal.Full Publication: 'http://ssrn.com/abstract=3101163' Macroprudential Frameworks, Implementation and Relationship with Other Policies.
MCM conducted a survey in December 2010 to take stock of international experiences with financial stability and the evolving macroprudential policy framework. The survey was designed to seek information in three broad areas: the institutional setup for macroprudential policy, the analytical approach to systemic risk monitoring, and the macroprudential policy toolkit. The survey was sent to 63 countries and the European Central Bank (ECB), including all countries in the G-20 and those subject to mandatory Financial Sector Assessment Programs (FSAPs). The target list is designed to cover a broad range of jurisdictions in all regions, but more weight is given to economies that are systemically important (see Annex for details). The response rate is 80 percent. This note provides a summary of the survey’s main findings.