Download Free Libertys Pimp In Congress Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Libertys Pimp In Congress and write the review.

Is it OK with you that DC politicians silence your free speech to make their job easier?Then they complain about it:From the 114th session, when Democrats were the minority party, a committee report said:The Rules Committee is the instrument Republicans used to break both Speakers' promises and shut out the elected representatives of half the country. From the 110th session, when Republicans were the minority party, the same congressional report said: The choice is simple: either the Democratic Majority can change its course and actually permit debate and consideration in the House, or they can continue their downward spiral of stifling the voice of any Member.The liberty of Free Speech for us has been pimped by Congress to make things easier for them and to benefit them. Look at our country today as a result. In Congress because half of us have no influence with our speech there is inequality. Hence Aristotle's warning that inequality brings instability.Majority Rule in Congress gives all the committees (115 in the House) to one political party. It is in committees that bills are drafted that eventually become law. In committees the chairperson silences the speech of the minority representatives. Thus half the citizen have no impact on the legislation that becomes law that we all have to live under. The result is placed on our children and grandchildren. Imagine now that we replace the monopoly of committee chairs with a ratio of chairs based on seated party membership in each chamber. If one party has 53% of the seats, they get 53% of the 115 committee chairs and the others get 47% of the 115 committee chairs. Then all citizen's voices would have a sword in creating new laws that we all live under. Your representative having a sword to defend your free speech will produce equality and with equality, if Aristotle is right, stability will finally be part of America and our children's future.
The Government Is A Pimp - And We're Letting Them Get Away With It! What is the difference between a pimp and the government? In B. Copeland's opinion, not much. Neither the pimp nor the government does any physical work. They both have others that do the actual work to make an income form them. So take a look inside to see examples of how the government pimps you and I.
This book is about relationships in the private individual money making plans of our society. Plus experiences of times that one go through when he or she is trying to make some reason out of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
In this collection of thoughtful, hard-hitting essays, Walter E. Williams once again takes on the left wing's most sacred cows with provocative insights, brutal candor, and an uncompromising reverence for personal liberty and the principles laid out in our Declaration of Independence and Constitution.
A Pulitzer Prize winner looks at the course of American history from the birth of the Constitution to the dawn of the Civil War. The years between 1787 and 1863 witnessed the development of the American Nation—its society, politics, customs, culture, and, most important, the development of liberty. Burns explores the key events in the republic’s early decades, as well as the roles of heroes from Washington to Lincoln and of lesser-known figures. Captivating and insightful, Burns’s history combines the color and texture of early American life with meticulous scholarship. Focusing on the tensions leading up to the Civil War, Burns brilliantly shows how Americans became divided over the meaning of Liberty. Vineyard of Liberty is a sweeping and engrossing narrative of America’s formative years.
Between 1750 and 1850 Spanish American politics underwent a dramatic cultural shift as monarchist colonies gave way to independent states based at least nominally on popular sovereignty and republican citizenship. In The Time of Liberty, Peter Guardino explores the participation of subalterns in this grand transformation. He focuses on Mexico, comparing local politics in two parts of Oaxaca: the mestizo, urban Oaxaca City and the rural villages of nearby Villa Alta, where the population was mostly indigenous. Guardino challenges traditional assumptions that poverty and isolation alienated rural peasants from the political process. He shows that peasants and other subalterns were conscious and complex actors in political and ideological struggles and that popular politics played an important role in national politics in the first half of the nineteenth century. Guardino makes extensive use of archival materials, including judicial transcripts and newspaper accounts, to illuminate the dramatic contrasts between the local politics of the city and of the countryside, describing in detail how both sets of citizens spoke and acted politically. He contends that although it was the elites who initiated the national change to republicanism, the transition took root only when engaged by subalterns. He convincingly argues that various aspects of the new political paradigms found adherents among even some of the most isolated segments of society and that any subsequent failure of electoral politics was due to an absence of pluralism rather than a lack of widespread political participation.