Kathleen Harland
Published: 2010-06
Total Pages: 106
Get eBook
The name of our Society may seem a trifle narrow, expressing a concern for naval dockyards, but a moment's reflection suggests that since the principal function of such places is the construction and repair of ships, it is a short step to their navigation, weaponry and engagement with the enemy. Having come this far, government and Admiralty policies become germane, as past issues of Transactions testify. Yet the actual manning of naval craft is arguably an important element of the picture, one which is taken up here, focusing on the work of naval surgeons at sea, and by extension, ashore to boot. The bulk of the papers are the outcome of a most fruitful collaboration with the Royal College of Surgeons of England, bringing the expertise of medical practitioners to the proceedings thus powerfully complementing the contributions of lay historians, so to speak.In this way conference was fortunate to hear a paper by the noted medical historian John Kirkup on surgical practice at sea in the seventeenth century, including illustrations of appliances and tools which certainly brought home the gruesome reality of those days. The same concept emerged in Rick Jolly's paper which reviewed his work as a Royal Marine medical officer in the Falklands conflict, making comparisons with John Hunter at the capture of Belle-Ile, off the coast of Brittany, in 1761. Three contributions were offered by naval historians. Kathleen Harland gave a detailed description of surgeons' activities both afloat and ashore in the early part of the eighteenth century, while Pat Crimmin examined the implications of the shortage of surgeons and surgeons' mates in the second half of the same century. The later years of the eighteenth century provided the temporal backdrop for Brian Vale's well argued paper setting straight the record of just who was responsible for the conquest of scurvy.Although she did not contribute to the joint conference, Celia Clark's research on naval hospitals was patently relevant to the theme of the day, justifying a request to submit something. Her interest is architectural, allowing her to pursue the way in which hospital design was influenced by the needs of the patients themselves. Similarly, the findings of the Society's Navy Board Project, coordinated by Sue Lumas, some of which concern medical issues, played no part in the conference, but their relevance is not in doubt. Selected correspondence is presented without analysis, leaving researchers to forge their own opinions. Since it is for the benefit of others, the whole exercise deserves an accolade. The final paper, by Stuart Drabble, looking at the work of Templer and Parlby, perhaps the best known of the eighteenth century dockyard contractors, may not fit the theme, but at least they were involved in the construction of Stonehouse naval hospital.