Download Free Fhwa Research And Technology Evaluation Program Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Fhwa Research And Technology Evaluation Program and write the review.

This report summarizes the 16 evaluations being conducted by the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center on behalf of FHWA’s Research and Technology Program. The FHWA R&T Program furthers the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center’s goal of ensuring transparency, accessibility, and responsiveness of R&T for all stakeholders. The 16 evaluations can be grouped into two waves. The first wave consists of six retrospective and four prospective evaluations, while the second wave comprises six prospective evaluations. Five evaluation teams have finished data collection and written final reports. One team has delivered a final Phase I report and is preparing its Phase II report. Three evaluation teams have submitted Final Evaluation Plans while five other teams have written Draft Evaluation Plans. Of the remaining two, one team has submitted a preliminary evaluation plan and the other is initiating planning activities.
This report summarizes the 16 evaluations being conducted by the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center on behalf of FHWA’s Research and Technology (R&T) Program. The FHWA R&T Program furthers the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center’s goal of ensuring transparency, accessibility, and responsiveness of R&T for all stakeholders. Six evaluation teams have finished data collection and written reports. One team has delivered a final phase I report and is preparing its phase II report. One team has delivered a draft final report. Of the 10 evaluations currently in progress, 7 teams have submitted final evaluation plans, 2 teams have submitted draft evaluation plans, and 1 team has submitted a preliminary evaluation plan.
This report documents an evaluation of Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Research and Technology Program’s activities on the implementation of the Eco-Logical approach by State transportation departments and metropolitan planning organization recipients of FHWA Eco-Logical funding. The evaluation team collected information on FHWA’s efforts to disseminate information to stakeholders, the extent to which stakeholders have adopted the Eco-Logical approach, and stakeholder-identified processes and environmental impacts obtained by agencies implementing the Eco-Logical approach. Data collected from literature reviews and stakeholder interviews (see main report for specific reference information) suggest that FHWA has consistently recognized the value of demonstrating its commitment to the Eco-Logical approach by providing funding and technical assistance to its stakeholders and encouraging practitioners to share results with their peers. FHWA research and funding has enabled its recipients to adopt the Eco-Logical approach sooner and more comprehensively. Funding recipients are building relationships with partners, sharing and using data in better ways, and incorporating information gathered to inform project prioritization and to develop integrated transportation plans. Most recipients focused their efforts on completing earlier planning-level steps and stages of the Eco-Logical approach. Few recipients identified, tracked, or quantified impacts related to project delivery or environmental mitigation. FHWA, partners, and stakeholders demonstrated a commitment to the Eco-Logical approach. Stakeholders adopted the Eco-Logical approach by building relationships, sharing and using data, integrating plans, and prioritizing project selection and mitigation.
This report details the evaluation of the Federal Highway Administration’s Office of Innovative Program Delivery Public-Private Partnership (P3) Capacity Building Program (P3 Program). The evaluators focused on the P3 Program’s P3 Toolkit as an educational resource for transportation practitioners that aimed to build knowledge and technical expertise to inform decisions related to the consideration, development, and implementation of P3 projects. The study concluded that, while less experienced practitioners found value in P3 Program materials, the P3 Program had limited impact on the implementation of new P3 legislation and adoption of P3s. The P3 Toolkit itself is still recognized by practitioners as a valuable resource and is noted by various sources as one of the most comprehensive resources on P3s.
The overall purpose of this evaluation was to understand the effect of the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA’s) Research and Technology Program activities on the implementation of agent-based approaches to transportation-related projects and activities. Agent-based modeling and simulation (ABMS) uses individual “agents,” typically drivers and agencies, to model changes in transportation networks and systems. Researchers and industry stakeholders view ABMS and the data-collection and validation processes that ABMS requires as a valuable, emerging practice that can be used to advance existing transportation-modeling and simulation techniques. ABMS can also be used for various transportation applications, including planning, operations, and safety countermeasures. As a result, the discipline and community are growing, and usage of ABMS approaches is expanding. The evaluation team assessed the role the FHWA Exploratory Advanced Research (EAR) Program played in this growth and how the EAR Program–funded research led to further developments and advancements. Beginning in 2009, the FHWA EAR Program began investigating the use of agent-based modeling techniques for characterizing driver and traveler behavior. The EAR Program sought to address technological advancements being applied to vehicles within the transportation network.