Download Free Failure Prioritization And Control Using The Neutrosophic Best And Worst Method Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Failure Prioritization And Control Using The Neutrosophic Best And Worst Method and write the review.

Failure prioritization process is described by identifying potential failures and its effects, quantifying their priorities and determining appropriate ways to mitigate or control. In the literature, many approaches are suggested to prioritize failures and associated effects quantitatively. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches are forefront that they can express the failures verbally based on decision-makers’ judgments. They explain different types of uncertainties, which are generally modeled by fuzzy sets.
Contributors to current issue (listed in papers’ order): Atena Tahmasbpour Meikola, Arif Mehmood, Wadood Ullah, Said Broumi, Muhammad Imran Khan, Humera Qureshi, Muhammad Ibrar Abbas, Humaira Kalsoom, Fawad Nadeem, T. Chalapathi, L. Madhavi, R. Suresh, S. Palaniammal, Nivetha Martin, Florentin Smarandache, S. A. Edalatpanah, Rafif Alhabib, A. A. Salama, Memet Şahin, Abdullah Kargın, Murat Yücel, Dimacha Dwibrang Mwchahary, Bhimraj Basumatary, R. S. Alghamdi, N. O. Alshehri, Shigui Du, Rui Yong, Jun Ye, Vasantha Kandasamy, Ilanthenral Kandasamy, Muhammad Saeed, Muhammad Saqlain, Asad Mehmood, Khushbakht Naseer, Sonia Yaqoob, Sudipta Gayen, Sripati Jha, Manoranjan Kumar Singh, Ranjan Kumar, Huseyin Kamaci, Shawkat Alkhazaleh, Anas Al-Masarwah, Abd Ghafur Ahmad, Merve Sena Uz, Akbar Rezaei, Mohamed Grida, Rehab Mohamed, Abdelnaser H. Zaid.
The Internet of Things (IoT) is used in the Supply chain management (SCM) systems to respond to the globalization of complex and dynamic markets and competitiveness in various supply chain scopes. Despite the current buzz about IoT and its role in the supply chain, there is not enough empirical data or extensive expertise to guide its implementation. Therefore, this paper addresses the ambiguity of assessing the performance of the IoT based supply chain by integrating plithogenic set with both Best-Worst (BWM) and Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) methods in a decision-making framework tailored for this field. The framework is based on 23 criteria that measure different aspects of the performance. The performance of the framework is assessed according to the plithogenic set theory and to the neutrosophic set theory using a case study of comparing the performance of IoT implantation with the SC of five e-commerce companies using three experts. The case study shows that the proposed framework has more consideration of the contradiction degree of each criteria to improve the accuracy of the evaluation results.
Reducing the potential risks in the manufacturing process to improve the reliability of the switched-mode power supply (SMPS) is a critical issue for the users’ safety. This paper proposes a novel failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) model based on hybrid multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM), which adopts neutrosophic set theory into the proposed model. A developed neutrosophic Best Worst method (NBWM) is used to evaluate the weights of risk factors and determine their importance. Secondly, the neutrosophic Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assessments (NWASPAS) method is utilized to calculate the Risk Priority Number (RPN) of thefailure modes.
Papers on neutrosophic and plithogenic sets, logics, probabilities and statistics, on NeutroAlgebra and AntiAlgebra, NeutroGeometry and AntiGeometry, SuperHyperAlgebra and Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlgebra, etc…
The best-worst method (BWM) is a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for evaluating a set of alternatives based on a set of decision criteria where two vectors of pairwise comparisons are used to calculate the importance weight of decision criteria. The BWM is an efficient and mathematically sound method used to solve a wide range of MCDM problems by reducing the number of pairwise comparisons and identifying the inconsistencies derived from the comparison process. In spite of its simplicity and efficiency, the BWM does not consider the decision-makers’ (DMs’) confidence about their pairwise comparisons. We propose a neutrosophic enhancement to the original BWM by introducing two new parameters as the DMs’ confidence in the best-to-others preferences and the DMs’ confidence in the others-to-worst preferences. We present two real-world cases to illustrate the applicability of the proposed neutrosophic enhanced BWM (NE-BWM) by considering confidence rating levels of the DMs.
This book provides in-depth guidance on how to use multi-criteria decision analysis methods for risk assessment and risk management. The frontiers of engineering operations management methods for identifying the risks, investigating their roles, analyzing the complex cause-effect relationships, and proposing countermeasures for risk mitigation are presented in this book. There is a total of ten chapters, mainly including the indicators and organizational models for risk assessment, the integrated Bayesian Best-Worst method and classifiable TOPSIS model for risk assessment, new risk prioritization model, fuzzy risk assessment under uncertainties, assessment of COVID-19 transmission risk based on fuzzy inference system, risk assessment and mitigation based on simulation output analysis, energy supply risk analysis, risk assessment and management in cash-in-transit vehicle routing problems, and sustainability risks of resource-exhausted cities. The most significant feature of this book is that it provides various systematic multi-criteria decision analysis methods for risk assessment and management, and illustrates the application of these methods in different fields. This book is beneficial to policymakers, decision-makers, experts, researchers and students related to risk assessment and management.
“Neutrosophic Sets and Systems” has been created for publications on advanced studies in neutrosophy, neutrosophic set, neutrosophic logic, neutrosophic probability, neutrosophic statistics that started in 1995 and their applications in any field, such as the neutrosophic structures developed in algebra, geometry, topology, etc. Some articles in this issue: Parameter Reduction of Neutrosophic Soft Sets and Their Applications, Geometric Programming (NGP) Problems Subject to (⋁,.) Operator; the Minimum Solution, Ngpr Homeomorphism in Neutrosophic Topological Spaces, Generalized Neutrosophic Separation Axioms in Neutrosophic Soft Topological Spaces.
Human errors during operations may seriously threaten patient recovery and safety and affect the doctor–patient relationship. Therefore, risk evaluation of the surgical process is critical. Risk evaluation by failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a prospective technology that can identify and evaluate potential failure modes in the surgical process to ensure surgical quality and patient safety. In this study, a hybrid surgical risk– evaluation model was proposed using FMEA and multiobjective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis plus full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA) method under a single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic environment. This work aimed to determine the most critical risk points during the surgical process and analyze corresponding solutions.
Decision making is a comprehensive process comprising of uncertainties that shall be handled with the right selection of decision making approaches. Selection of the optimal alternatives and the best criteria is the expected outcome of any decision making strategy. This paper proposes a decision making model based on the plithogenic pythagorean best –worst method which is an extension of the multi-valued neutrosophic approach of BWM. The efficiency of the developed model is determined with the example pertaining to the optimal selection of the teaching methods based on the attribute values or the sub criteria and it is also compared with the neutrosophic approach. In the proposed model plithogenic and pythagorean neutrosophic sets are used for representing the expert’s opinion.