Download Free Evaluating The Grantmaking Process Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Evaluating The Grantmaking Process and write the review.

A state-of-the-art guide for developing grants witha strong emphasis on using program outcome measurement to underscore need and accountability Based on the authors' many years of experience in the public and nonprofit sectors, Effective Grant Writing and Program Evaluation for Human Service Professionals integrates the topics of grant proposal writing and program evaluation, offering grant seekers the practical guidance they need to develop quality proposals, obtain funding, and demonstrate service results and accountability. The authors clearly and succinctly illustrate and describe each stage of the grant writing and evaluation process. Problems or issues that arise frequently are highlighted and followed by specific advice. In addition, numerous real-world examples and exercises are included throughout the book to give readers the opportunity for reflection and practice. This timely reference incorporates a strengths perspective, providing: An inside look at the grant writing and evaluation processes, with insights from experienced grant writers, agency administrators, foundation program managers, and grant reviewers Specific examples of successful grant proposals and evaluation plans and instruments serving as models for learning and practice Field-tested individual and group exercises that facilitate the development of grant writing and evaluation skills Discussion of electronic technology in grant writing and evaluation, including writing and submitting grant proposals online, and identifying funding sources This grant writing and program evaluation guide follows a needs-driven, evidence-based, result-oriented, and client-centered perspective. Its authoritative discussion equips human service professionals to effectively develop grants with a strong emphasis on measuring program outcomes.
"Gathered together in this unique book on evaluation and effective foundation practice are the experienced-based perspectives and measured insights of both seasoned practitioners and key philanthropic thought leaders. Foundations and Evaluation is a substantial think piece for grantmakers of any size." —Dorothy S. Ridings, president and CEO, Council on Foundations "Foundations and Evaluation explores the intersection between organizational effectiveness and evaluation and demonstrates the need for commitment to evaluation throughout the foundation. . . . A good read for both newcomers to evaluation and those with more experience, written by some of the most highly respected leaders in the field." —Kathleen P. Enright, executive director, Grantmakers for Effective Organizations
The National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) is the principal federal agency supporting applied research, training, and development to improve the lives of individuals with disabilities. NIDRR's mission is to generate new knowledge and promote its effective use in improving the ability of persons with disabilities to perform activities of their choice in the community, as well as to expand society's capacity to provide full opportunities and accommodations for its citizens with disabilities. NIDRR prides itself on being proactive in establishing program performance measures and developing accountability data systems to track the progress of its grantees. An electronic annual reporting system is used to collect data from grantees on many aspects of grant operation and outputs. Various formative and summative evaluation approaches have been used to assess the quality of the performance and results of the agency's research portfolio and its grantees. Prompted by the need to provide more data on its program results, in 2009 NIDRR requested that the National Research Council (NRC) conduct an external evaluation of some of the agency's key processes and assess the quality of outputs produced by NIDRR grantees (National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, 2009a). Review of Disability and Rehabilitation Research presents the results of that evaluation.
Introduction: With the persistence of health inequities in societies, it is imperative that public health interventions address the social determinants of health to attain the highest level of health for all people. The potential for grantmaking organizations to change systems and promote health equity highlights the importance of evaluating grantmaking processes, which may increase funders' understanding of their role in addressing the social determinants of health. Purpose: To evaluate and describe the Pacific Hospital Preservation and Development Authority's (PHPDA) Major Grant decision-making process from 2015 to 2018 and compare characteristics at the agency and program-level for programs that were funded and not funded. Methods: A process evaluation was performed through content review and data abstraction of Major Grant application materials from 2015 to 2018. Results: Over four years, the PHPDA invested over $3.8 million dollars into longstanding, mostly nonprofit agencies to implement various types of programs, which were deeply concentrated toward communities of color. The programs funded by the Major Grant ranged from medical programs that provided direct services to different target populations to outreach and education programs that served as a resource for groups that may have been previously excluded from health-promoting environments as a result of unjust policies. For both funded and not funded applications, the top PHPDA priority area was addressing the cultural, linguistic, economic, and other access barriers to successful utilization of medical and other services. Funded programs were responsive to more PHPDA priority areas and were more likely to have been proposed by agencies that had previously been awarded a PHPDA grant, compared to programs and agencies that were not funded. Across the two groups, there was no difference in the type of program proposed, with both groups having a focus on medical care. Conclusion: The PHPDA established the Major Grant to provide funding to agencies and programs seeking to improve access to health resources for communities and populations in the Puget Sound region. Findings confirmed that the PHPDA's Major Grant decision-making process emphasized funding agencies and programs aligned with the PHPDA's funding principles and priorities and mission of promoting health equity. The PHPDA is an example of a grantmaking organization that is "holding truth to power" by exploring the characteristics of their funding decisions. Evaluations are a mechanism for holding funders accountable for their grant awards and should be employed by other foundations and grantmaking organizations. To maximize the benefits of their scarce resources in reducing health inequities, funders must remain informed about their funding portfolios and be accountable to how their investments are or are not in service to the attainment of health equity.
This fully updated and revised edition of a classic guide to grant writing for health and human service professionals reflects the two major changes in the field: new NIH application processes and an increased emphasis on interprofessional and team approaches to science. New case examples reflect grant writing strategies for a great variety of health and human service professions, and the text includes an enhanced focus on online methods for organizing grant submissions. A new section on special considerations for submitting grants addresses specific types of research including community-based participatory research, mixed methods, behavioral intervention research, and dissertation and , mentorship proposals. The new chapter on common writing challenges and solutions provides examples of strong and weak statements and highlights the importance of writing with precision. Additionally, this new edition provides an expanded section on post-award requirements and links to NIH videos about grant writing. Written for individuals in both academic and practice settings, the guide addresses, step-by-step, the fundamental principles for effectively securing funding. It is the only book to provide grant-writing information that encompasses many disciplines and to focus on building a research career with grant writing as a step-by-step process. It provides detailed, time-tested strategies for building an investigative team, highlights the challenges of collaboration, and describes how to determine the expertise needed for a team and the roles of co-investigators. The book addresses the needs of both novice and more experienced researchers. New to the Fourth Edition: Reflects recent changes to the field including an emphasis on interprofessional approaches to science and new NIH application processes Offers additional case examples relevant to social work, nursing, psychology, rehabilitation, and occupational, physical, and speech therapies Provides links to NIH websites containing videos on grant writing Includes chapter opener objectives Expands section on post-award requirements Focuses on electronic mechanisms for organizing grant submissions
Expert Tools and Techniques for Managing Funded Programs and Keeping the Grant Money Flowing in As anyone with a history in nonprofit management knows, a grant recipient’s job is far from over once the check is cut. That’s just when the real work begins. Especially now, when funders are taking a more active role in seeing that their money makes the desired impact, it is vitally important to the future of your mission that the programs under your stewardship succeed, beyond even your own expectations. Grant Winner’s Toolkit can help make that happen. Based on their own experiences and the experiences of hundreds of nonprofit managers nationwide, authors James Quick and Cheryl New provide expert advice and guidance on managing every aspect of your funded projects with the consummate professionalism demanded by your funders—from the drafting of strategies and action plans to the drawing up of budgets, from staff recruitment and team building, all the way through to the writing of the next grant proposal. They also arm you with an extensive arsenal of forms, checklists, time sheets, practice exercises, and other valuable tools that will help you to successfully: Organize and manage a grantseeking initiative Write comprehensive action plans Develop winning project strategies Develop realistic budgets Find, hire, and manage qualified team members Manage all key project resources Evaluate project efficacy Implement and maintain a policy of continual program improvement Replicate programs The enclosed disk contains customizable forms covering all aspects of project management that make it easy for you and your team to put the methods described in the book to work in your organization.For more information about the Polaris Corporation visit www.polarisgrantscentral.net www.wiley.com/nonprofit
Over the last fifty years behavioral and medical research has been generously supported by the federal government, private foundations, and other philanthropic organizations contributing to the development of a vibrant public health system both in the United States and worldwide. However, these funds are dwindling and to stay competitive, investigators must understand the funding environment and know how to translate their hypotheses into research grant applications that reviewers evaluate as having scientific merit. The Second Edition of ‘How to Write a Successful Research Grant Application’ is the only book of its kind written by federal research investigators which provides technical assistance for researchers applying for biobehavioral and psychosocial research funding and can give them an edge in this competitive environment. The book provides invaluable tips on all aspects of the art of grantsmanship, including: how to determine research opportunities and priorities, how to develop the different elements of an application, how to negotiate the electronic submission and review processes, and how to disseminate the findings. Charts, visual aids, Web links, an extensive real-world example of a research proposal with budget, and a "So You Were Awarded Your Grant—Now What?" chapter show prospective applicants how to: - Formulate a testworthy—and interesting—hypothesis. - Select the appropriate research mechanism. - Avoid common pitfalls in proposal writing. - Develop an adequate control group. - Conduct a rigorous qualitative inquiry. - Develop a budget justification of costs. - Develop a human subjects of animal welfare plan. - Write a data analytic plan. - Design a quality control/assurance program. - Read between the lines of a summary of the review of your application. Although its focus is on Public Health Service funding, ‘How to Write a Successful Research Grant’ is equally useful for all research proposals, including graduate students preparing a thesis or dissertation proposal. Service providers in community-based organizations and public health agencies will also find this a useful resource in preparing a proposal to compete for grant funds from state and community resources, non-government organizations, and foundations.
The growing emphasis on accountability and effectiveness has pushed grantmakers to be more data driven in communicating the achievement of their outcomes. Literature on this subject suggests that grantmakers do not utilize evaluation methods to articulate the connection between their outcomes and their organizational mission and objectives, and are unwilling to adopt evaluation for this purpose. This paper examines whether or not Greater Philadelphia grantmakers in the arts are part of this population and finds that grantmakers of all sizes have and continue to practice evaluation in ways unique to each institution. The observed challenge facing these grantmakers is to adopt efficient and practical evaluation practices to understand, articulate, and monitor each funder's discrete grantmaking objectives. Each grantmaker's objectives are either impact or support-oriented, and this orientation denotes a funder's institutional culture (i.e. staff size, overall annual grant budget, and funding priorities). These two orientations are the root of not only grantmaking strategy, but how a grantmaker practices and uses evaluation.