Download Free Discipline Filosofiche 2012 2 Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Discipline Filosofiche 2012 2 and write the review.

Contents: Luca Vanzago, Introduction • Ted Toadvine, Tempo naturale e natura immemoriale • Luca Vanzago, The Problem of Nature between Philosophy and Science. Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenological Ontology and its Epistemological Implications • Roberta Lanfredini, Essenza e Natura: Husserl e Merleau-Ponty sulla fondazione dell’essere vivente • Christopher Pollard, Merleau-Ponty and Embodied Cognitive Science • Gianluca De Fazio, L’Essere pre-logico. Una lettura ontologica dell’interpretazione di Copenhagen a partire da Merleau-Ponty • Danilo Manca, La scienza allo stato nascente. Merleau-Ponty e Sellars sull’immagine scientifica della natura • Darian Meacham, Sense and Life: Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy of Nature and Evolutionary Biology • Franck Robert, Merleau-Ponty, Whitehead, une pensée de la vie • Claus Halberg, Emergent Life: Addressing the “Ontological-Diplopia” of the 21st Century with Merleau-Ponty and Deacon • Prisca Amoroso, Prospettive ecologiche nell’opera di Merleau-Ponty
Anna Bortolan, Alessandro Salice, Introduction • Matthew Ratcliffe, Depression, Self-Regulation, and Intersubjectivity Fredrik Svenaeus, Why Heideggerian Death Anxiety is not Truly Uncanny: Existential Feelings and Psychiatric Disorders • Mads Gram Henriksen, Borut Škodlar, Varieties of Emotions: A phenomenological Exploration of Guilt, Shame and Despair in Depression and Schizophrenia • Caterina Maurer, Esperienza affettiva e patologie dello spirito nell’Anthropologie hegeliana • Anastasia Philippa Scrutton, Depression and aesthetic experience: can people with depression appreciate beauty? • Matthew R. Broome, Lisa Bortolotti, Affective Instability and Paranoia • Juliette Vazard, Epistemic Anxiety, Adaptive Cognition, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder • Shaun Gallagher, Bruce Janz, Solitude, Self and Autonomy • Moujan Mirdamadi, A Phenomenological Account of Emotional Experiences in Depression among Iranian Patients • Mary Edwards, Acute Gendered Shame Demystified Joel Krueger, Giovanna Colombetti, Affective affordances and psychopathology
Contents: Emanuele Mariani, Presentazione • Dermot Moran, Husserl on Human Subjects as Sense-Givers and Sense-Apprehenders in a World of Significance • Dominique Pradelle, De Husserl à Heidegger : intentionnalité, monde et sens • Pierre-Jean Renaudie, Dire et penser “je” : La vacuité de la présence à soi du sujet de Husserl à Derrida • Julien Farges, Réflexivité et scission originaire du sujet chez Husserl • Jean-Sébastien Hardy, La “lutte pour la vie et la mort” : les fondements affectifs de la conflictualité chez Husserl • Elisa Magrì, Subjectivity and Empathy: A Steinian Approach • Pedro M.S. Alves, Self-consciousness and Intentionality. A Reappraisal of Brentano’s and Rosenthal’s Theses • Abbed Kanoor, Leben und Zeit. Zu Hans Blumenbergs kritischer Auseinandersetzung mit der Zeitphänomenologie Husserls • Andrea Angelini, Filosofia del concetto e soggettività. Jean Cavaillès tra fenomenologia e dialettica • Karel Novotný, Renversements de l’intentionnalité : Jean-Luc Marion et la mise en question de la subjectivité de l’apparaître • Nicolas de Warren, Husserl’s Cartesianism, anew
Sommario: Giovanni Matteucci, Stefano Marino, Presentazione • Stefano Marino, Giovanni Matteucci, The Dark Side of the Truth. Nature and Natural Beauty in Adorno • Josef Früchtl, Tell Me Lies, and Show Me Invisible Images! Adorno’s Criticism on Film – Revisited • Tom Huhn, The Enigma of Experience; Art and Truth Content • Giuseppe Di Giacomo, Form, Appearance, Testimony: Reflections On Adorno’s Aesthetics • Samir Gandesha, Adorno’s Reading of Endgame: Between Autonomy and Authenticity • Fabrizio Desideri, Ratio, Mimesis, Dialectics: On Some Motifs in Theodor W. Adorno • Giovanni Zanotti, Contingent Antagonism. A Key to Adorno’s Dialectic • Paolo A. Bolaños, The Promise of the Non-Identical: Adorno’s Revaluation of the Language of Philosophy • Filippo Costantini, Cosa mostra la dialettica? Contraddizione, negazione e non identità in Hegel e Adorno • Giacomo Fronzi, Dialettica negativa, metafisica e intersoggettività. Una lettura relazionale del pensiero di Th.W. Adorno • Pietro Terzi, Critica e decostruzione dell’immediato. Adorno e Derrida di fronte a Husserl
Riccardo Chiaradonna, Filippo Forcignanò e Franco Trabattoni, Presentazione • Francesco Fronterotta, “Do the Gods Play Dice?”. Sensible Sequentialism and Fuzzy Logic in Plato’s Timaeus • Riccardo Chiaradonna, Massimo Marraffa, Ontology and the Self: Ancient and Contemporary Perspectives • Gabriele Galluzzo, Are Matter and Form Parts? Aristotle’s and Neo-Aristotelian Hylomorphism • Riin Sirkel, Essence and Cause: Making Something Be What It Is • Marilù Papandreou, Aristotle’s Hylomorphism and The Contemporary Metaphysics of Artefacts • Gabriele De Anna, Substance, Form, and Modality • Maddalena Bonelli, Dipendenza e indipendenza ontologica: la modernità della posizione peripatetica • Enrico Postiglione, Aristotle on the Distribution of Consciousness • Diego Zucca, Neo-Aristotelian Biofunctionalism • Matteo Pietropaoli, L’οὐσία come presenza costante e l’esser vero come autentico essere. Heidegger interprete di Aristotele, Metafisica Θ 10
Contents: Mario Alai, Andrea Sereni and Giorgio Volpe, Guest Editors’ Preface • Ernest Sosa, Philosophical Intuitions and Metaphysical Analysis • Jonathan M. Weinberg, The Methodological Necessity of Experimental Philosophy • Steven Bland, Conceptual Analysis, Analytic Philosophy, and the Psychologistic Turn • Bryce Huebner, The Construction of Philosophical Intuitions • Alfredo Tomasetta, Physicalist Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind (far less Warranted than Usually Thought) • Markus Pantsar, Assessing the “Empirical Philosophy of Mathematics” • Huginn Freyr Thorsteinsson, Experimental Philosophy and the Importance of Intuitions in the Philosophy of Language • Francesca Ervas, Elisabetta Gola, Antonio Ledda and Giuseppe Sergioli, Lexical Ambiguity in Elementary Inferences: an Experimental Study • Richard Davies, How to Point a Philosophical Armchair
Luigi Azzariti-Fumaroli, Lidia Gasperoni, Presentazione • Paul Franks, From Quine to Hegel: Naturalism, Anti-Realism and Maimon’s Question Quid Facti • Christoph Asmuth, Salomon Maimon und die Transzendentalphilosophie ganz grundsätzlich • Gideon Freudenthal, Overturning the Narrative: Maimon vs. Kant • Luigi Azzariti-Fumaroli, Uno schlemiel trascendentale. Salomon Maimon fra momenti di vita e movimenti di pensiero • Daniel Elon, Skepsis und System. Salomon Maimons Versuch über die Transzendental-philosophie und Gottlob E. Schulzes Aenesidemus in chiastischer Gegen-überstellung • Meir Buzaglo, Salomon Maimon and the Regular Decahedron • Gualtiero Lorini, Verità, linguaggio e coscienza in Salomon Maimon • Luca Guidetti, Kant e Maimon: prolegomeni a una topologia del tempo • Gaetano Rametta, Filosofia trascendentale e ontologia della differenza in Salomon Maimon • Lidia Gasperoni, Immaginare approssimando. L’(im)possibilità di un’estetica nella filosofia di Salomon Maimon • Maria Caterina Marinelli, Maimon’s Implicit Influence in the Eigne Meditationen über Elementar-Philosophie of Fichte • David Hereza Modrego, Die Transformation der Frage “quid juris?” bei Kant zu Maimons “Satz der Bestimmbarkeit”
This book offers a defence of Wrightean epistemic entitlement, one of the most prominent approaches to hinge epistemology. It also systematically explores the connections between virtue epistemology and hinge epistemology. According to hinge epistemology, any human belief set is built within and upon a framework of pre-evidential propositions – hinges – that cannot be justified. Epistemic entitlement argues that we are entitled to trust our hinges. But there remains a problem. Entitlement is inherently unconstrained and arbitrary: We can be entitled to any hinge proposition under the right circumstances. In this book, the author argues that we need a non-arbitrariness clause that protects entitlement from defeat. This clause, he argues, is to require epistemic virtue. Virtuous cognitive dispositions provide the non-arbitrariness clause that protects entitlement from defeat. The epistemic character of the agent who holds a particular set of hinges tells us something about the hinges’ epistemic status. Conversely, epistemic virtues are cognitive dispositions and capacities that rely on hinge propositions – without trusting in some hinges, we would be unable to exercise our virtues. Trust Responsibly will appeal to scholars and advanced students working on epistemology, Wittgenstein, and virtues.
This book presents an original discussion and analysis of epistemic peer disagreement. It reviews a wide range of cases from the literature, and extends the definition of epistemic peerhood with respect to the current one, to account for the actual variability found in real-world examples. The book offers a number of arguments supporting the variability in the nature and in the range of disagreements, and outlines the main benefits of disagreement among peers i.e. what the author calls the benefits to inquiry argument.