Download Free Derechos Cambio Constitucional Y Teoria Juridica Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Derechos Cambio Constitucional Y Teoria Juridica and write the review.

Derechos, cambio constitucional y teoría jurídica es una compilación de escritos de derecho constitucional y teoría del derecho sobre la fundamentación de los derechos humanos y fundamentales, su aplicación en general y la de algunos derechos en particular -como los derechos sociales-. También comprende el tratamiento sistemático de diversos problemas que suscita el cambio constitucional en tiempos ordinarios y de justicia transicional. Por último, analiza de forma crítica algunas de las más influyentes teorías del derecho expuestas, tanto desde el positivismo jurídico como desde el no-positivismo, en la última década. Los académicos, operadores jurídicos y estudiantes de derecho pueden encontrar en este libro un recurso bibliográfico para expandir su horizonte en cuanto a los asuntos de teoría constitucional de mayor actualidad en nuestro contexto.
El cambio constitucional es una modificación en el conjunto de normas constitucionales válidas. Las constituciones pueden cambiar al menos de siete formas, a saber: promulgación, aceptación, derogación o abrogación explícita, derogación o abrogación implícita, interpretación, mutación infraconstitucional y desuso. La distinción entre disposiciones constitucionales y normas constitucionales facilita la comprensión de estas formas de cambio constitucional. Las disposiciones constitucionales son los enunciados de una Constitución escrita. Las normas constitucionales son el conjunto de significados que la Constitución escrita expresa o que han sido aceptados por convenciones constitucionales no escritas. Dichos significados pueden formularse como proposiciones prescriptivas que establecen que determinada acción está obligada, prohibida o permitida, o le atribuye una competencia constitucional o inmunidad a un individuo o grupo.
El cambio constitucional es una modificación en el conjunto de normas constitucionales válidas. Las constituciones pueden cambiar al menos de siete formas, a saber: promulgación, aceptación, derogación o abrogación explícita, derogación o abrogación implícita, interpretación, mutación infraconstitucional y desuso. La distinción entre disposiciones constitucionales y normas constitucionales facilita la comprensión de estas formas de cambio constitucional'. Las disposiciones constitucionales son los enunciados de una Constitución escrita. Las normas constitucionales son el conjunto de significados que la Constitución escrita expresa o que han sido aceptados por convenciones constitucionales no escritas. Dichos significados pueden formularse como proposiciones prescriptivas que establecen que determinada acción está obligada, prohibida o permitida, o le atribuye una competencia constitucional o inmunidad a un individuo o grupo".
After more than seventy years of uninterrupted authoritarian government headed by the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI), Mexico formally began the transition to democracy in 2000. Unlike most other new democracies in Latin America, no special Constitutional Court was set up, nor was there any designated bench of the Supreme Court for constitutional adjudication. Instead, the judiciary saw its powers expand incrementally. Under this new context inevitable questions emerged: How have the justices interpreted the constitution? What is the relation of the court with the other political institutions? How much autonomy do justices display in their decisions? Has the court considered the necessary adjustments to face the challenges of democracy? It has become essential in studying the new role of the Supreme Court to obtain a more accurate and detailed diagnosis of the performances of its justices in this new political environment. Through critical review of relevant debates and using original data sets to empirically analyze the way justices voted on the three main means of constitutional control from 2000 through 2011, leading legal scholars provide a thoughtful and much needed new interpretation of the role the judiciary plays in a country’s transition to democracy This book is designed for graduate courses in law and courts, judicial politics, comparative judicial politics, Latin American institutions, and transitions to democracy. This book will equip scholars and students with the knowledge required to understand the importance of the independence of the judiciary in the transition to democracy.
This volume, incorporating the work of scholars from various parts of the globe, taps the wisdom of the Westphalian (and post-Westphalian) world on the use of federalism and secession as tools for managing regional conflicts. The debate has rarely been more important than it is right now, especially in light of recent events in Catalonia, Scotland, Québec and the Sudan - all unique political contexts raising similar questions about how best to balance competing claims for autonomy, interdependence, political voice, and exit. Exploring how various nations have encountered comparable conflicts, some more and some less successfully, the book broadens the perspectives of scholars, government officials, and citizens struggling to resolve sovereignty conflicts with a full appreciation of the underlying principles they represent.
This book analyses the most important problems and challenges of the current labour market from the point of view of the balance between the parties of the employment contract. The contributions here are related to various pressing topics, including, for example, the future of work and worker protection on an international level against the strengthening of employers’ powers. In addition, the nature and limits of employers’ power, non-competition contractual clauses and workers’ rights in the face of new communication and information technologies are also discussed. The contributors are drawn from several countries, such as Portugal, Spain, Bolivia, Italy, México and Switzerland. The book will appeal to lawyers, legal experts, human resources experts, economist, judges, academia, and staff from companies and trade unions, and employers’ representation. The volume features insights and contributions in different languages, with chapters in Spanish (12), English (4) and Portuguese (5).
Latin America offers a democratic and constitutional process, with the goals to respect fundamental human rights and control the excess of power. Nevertheless, the weaknesses of the rule of law’s institutions does not guarantee for all citizens the protection of old and new rights. In this sense, the Inter-American Fundamental Rights Conference organized by the Inter-American Network on Fundamental Rights and Democracy (RED–IDD) is an annual meeting of professors and researchers from the different universities of Latin America, addressing topics of particular importance regarding the possibilities and challenges of the consolidation of the constitutional state in the region. This book presents the minutes of the Fourth Inter-American Fundamental Rights Conference, and explores topics such as political rights and the consolidation of democracy in Latin America; impeachment and judicial guarantees; the challenges of freedom of information: and judicial protection and due process, amongst others.
A key intermediary between courts and the public are the journalists who monitor the actions of justices and report their decisions, pronouncements, and proclivities. Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective is the first volume of its kind - a comparative analysis of the relationship between supreme courts and the press who cover them. Understanding this relationship is critical in a digital media age when government transparency is increasingly demanded by the public and judicial actions are the subject of press and public scrutiny. Richard Davis and David Taras take a comparative look at how justices in countries around the world relate to the media, the interactive points between the courts and the press, the roles of television and the digital media, and the future of the relationship.
The modern state, law, and constitution result from a legal canon that (re)produces the abyssal lines dividing the world that is validated from the world whose humanity and epistemological validity are denied. This book aims to contribute to a post-abyssal reflection on law and constitutionalism by considering the structural axes of power that are constitutive of modern law “capitalism, colonialism, and heteropatriarchy” alongside the legal plurality of the world. Is it possible to decolonize, decommodify, and depatriarchalize the constitution? The authors speak from multiple geographies, raise different questions, resort to differentiated theoretical approaches, and reveal varying levels of optimism about the possibilities of transforming constitutions. The readers are confronted with critical perspectives on the Eurocentric legal canon, as well as with the recognition of anti-capitalist, anti-colonial, and anti-patriarchal legal experiences. The horizon of this publication is the expansion of the possibilities of legal and political imagination.