Download Free Defamation Libel And Its Relation To Freedom Of Speech Overview Of The Malaysian Laws And The Islamic Legal Principles Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Defamation Libel And Its Relation To Freedom Of Speech Overview Of The Malaysian Laws And The Islamic Legal Principles and write the review.

Freedom of speech is fundamental towards the founding of a democratic country as distinctly expressed in Article 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution. However, there are restrictions to this right and freedom. Article 10(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution exempts or excludes defamation actions from this right by passing the Defamation Act 1957 to control and ensure this right and freedom of speech are exercised in accordance with law. This paper concentrates only on one element of defamation under the Defamation Act 1957 and Penal Code (Act 574); libel. Therefore, this paper will focus on the extent of the rights and freedom of speech, and how elements of libel plays a significant role in determining the restrictions of freedom of speech. The objectives of conducting this research are to examine the scope, concept and development of libel, explore the possible harmonisation, and establish recommendations that could be used to enhance the libel law. This paper look into the matter from the Malaysian law and the Islamic legal perspectives. Comparative legal research and qualitative methods will be applied in this paper based on the legal materials; law reports, legal commentaries, judicial decisions, Quranic verses, As-Sunnah, and opinions derived from Muslim scholars. The general observations is that, there are similarities and differences in libel laws according to the Malaysian laws and the Islamic legal principles which can be blended to form an effective Malaysian libel laws. It can strengthen the countermeasure against more complicated libel actions and at the same time to balance and integrate the relationship between libel laws and freedom of speech, and this may be implemented through the harmonisation processes.
Freedom of speech is fundamental to the founding of a democratic country which is distinctly expressed in Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. However, there are restrictions to the rights and freedom as provided for in Article 10 (2) (a) of the Federal Constitution, which exempted or excluded the defamation actions from the said right by passing the Defamation Act 1957 in controlling and ensuring the said rights and freedom of speech are exercised in accordance with the tenets of the law. The researcher intends to concentrate only on one element of defamation under the Defamation Act 1957 and Penal Code (Act 574), i.e., libel. Therefore, this book will focus on the extent of the rights and freedom of speech, and how the libel element plays a significant role in determining the restrictions of freedom of speech. The objectives of conducting this research are to examine the scope, concept, and development of libel, explore the possible harmonisation, and establish recommendations that could be used to enhance the libel law. This book will also focus on bilateral or two-way basis research, i.e., from Malaysian law and Islamic legal perspectives in relation to freedom of speech respectively. Comparative legal research and qualitative methods will be applied in this thesis based on the legal materials, i.e., law reports, legal commentaries, judicial decisions, Quranic verses, As-Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam), and opinions derived from Muslim scholars. The general observation is that there are similarities and differences in libel laws according to Malaysian law and Islamic legal principles which can be blended and forming effective Malaysian libel law for the purpose of strengthening the countermeasure against more complicated libel actions and at the same time to balance and integrate the relationship between libel law and freedom of speech, and this may be implemented through the harmonisation processes.
Should offence to religions be punishable by law, or does freedom of expression extend even to blasphemy? This book examines this question.
As part of the most concerned country, Malaysia has provided clear written legal statutes in promoting and protecting the freedom of speech. Articles 10(1)(a) and (2)(a) of the Federal Constitution provides the clearest indication to the general public that the legal system of our country do give the protection of the freedom of speech. The objective of this paper is to focus on the provisions of the freedom of speech (especially academic freedom) from the related statutes and cases reported in the relevant journals. This paper will also focus on the scope, wisdoms, purposes and provide the possible recommendations or suggestions; in the area of the implementation of the civil law and the Islamic legal principles in the Malaysian legal system, in order to strengthen, enhance and harmonizing these respective laws in force, which deal with the academic freedom issues for the purpose of protecting and promoting the freedom of speech in Malaysia according to the rule of law. The legal research method will be applied in obtaining the relevant data and information. The writer is of the opinion that the Malaysian legal system should be transformed and harmonized between these two legal foundations, i.e., the civil law and the Islamic legal principles, in respecting the spirit of Article 3 of the Federal Constitution which provides that Islam as a religion of the Federation. The academicians should be given the autonomy to express their opinion that can contribute to the betterment of the society.
This report examines and compares the content of laws prohibiting blasphemy ("blasphemy laws") worldwide through the lens of international and human rights law principles. The laws examined in this study prohibit or criminalize the expression of opinions deemed "blasphemous," or counter to majority views or religious belief systems, and many impose serious, often criminal, penalties. Blasphemy laws are actively enforced in many states throughout the world. Many governments deem repeal not feasible or desirable and justify the prohibition and criminalization of blasphemy as necessary to promote religious harmony. This study seeks to evaluate the language and content of blasphemy laws to understand what aspects of these laws adhere to--or deviate from--international and human rights law principles. A better understanding of the laws' compliance with these principles may assist in the public policy community in developing clear, specifically-tailored recommendations for areas for reform. Related products: Explore ourFaith-Based Education resources collection Discover ourHuman Rights collection
The opportunities afforded by the Internet greatly overshadow the challenges. While not forgetting this, we can nevertheless still address some of the problems that arise. Hate speech online is one such problem. But what exactly is hate speech online, and how can we deal with it effectively? As with freedom of expression, on- or offline, UNESCO defends the position that the free flow of information should always be the norm. Counter-speech is generally preferable to suppression of speech. And any response that limits speech needs to be very carefully weighed to ensure that this remains wholly exceptional, and that legitimate robust debate is not curtailed.
This book details the legal ramifications of existing anti-blasphemy laws and debates the legitimacy of such laws in Western liberal democracies.
Irshad Manji's message of moral courage, with stories about contemporary reformers such as Martin Luther King, Jr., Gandhi, and Islam's own Gandhi, inspire and show the way to practicing faith without fear. Irshad addresses all people, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, in this universal message about the importance of independent thought and internal strength, of love, liberty, free speech, and the pursuit of happiness. Allah, Liberty, and Love is about creating choices beyond conforming or leaving the faith, which is what Manji hears from young Muslims who write to her in frustration, whose emails, letters, and conversations are included in this book. Manji writes, "I'll show struggling Muslims how to embrace a third option: reforming ourselves." And she recounts many affecting stories from young people who have contacted her for advice on how to step out of limiting views of Islam and the restrictions they put on life, love, family, and careers.
Dworkin's important book is a collection of essays which discuss almost all of the great constitutional issues of the last two decades, including abortion, euthanasia, capital punishment, homosexuality, pornography, and free speech. Dworkin offers a consistently liberal view of the Constitution and argues that fidelity to it and to law demands that judges make moral judgments. He proposes that we all interpret the abstract language of the Constitution by reference to moral principles about political decency and justice. His 'moral reading' therefore brings political morality into the heart of constitutional law. The various chapters of this book were first published separately; now drawn together they provide the reader with a rich, full-length treatment of Dworkin's general theory of law.
A short exposition of the value and concept of human rights in Islam as noted in the Quran and Sunnah