Amanda Glassman
Published: 2006
Total Pages: 58
Get eBook
Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programs are spreading rapidly throughout the developing world. Since 1997, seven countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have implemented and evaluated CCT programs with health and nutrition components. These are the subjects of this paper and include Brazil's Bolsa Alimentacao/Bolsa Familia, Colombia's Familias en Acción, Ecuador's Bono de Desarrollo Humano, Honduras' PRAF, Jamaica's PATH, Mexico's Progresa/Oportunidades, and Nicaragua's Red de Protección Social. Others are in the process of development in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Panama and Paraguay, and around the world. While evaluation results are encouraging, features of program design are remarkably similar country to country, generating concerns that local realities are not sufficiently taken into account and highlighting the need for better exante analysis of the underlying development problem to be solved by the intervention. This paper will critically analyze the program effect model with respect to health and nutrition outcomes, present the health and nutrition evaluation results to date, draw some conclusions regarding the use of CCT programs to improve health and nutrition status and promote healthy behaviors, and suggest future directions for the use of CCT programs as an incentive to promote service use and healthy feeding practices. The existing literature well describes and analyzes the design and implementation features of CCT programs (Handa and Davis 2006; Rawlings and Rubio 2003). In recognition of these efforts, this paper will make reference to features of the programs when relevant for the discussion, and annex A includes a brief overview of these features. An annex on the methodological aspects of evaluation is also included as a reference. We also note that this paper focuses narrowly on the health and nutrition impact of the programs. The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 highlights the basic design features of CCT programs, section 3 describes the key demand and supply-side factors that determine use and effectiveness of health care services, and section 4 outlines nine key assumptions that implicitly underlie the program effect model and current evaluation efforts with regards to CCT programs, reviewing and critically examining the evidence available about the plausibility of these assumptions. Section 5 concludes with recommendations for how best to move forward with CCT programs for improving health and nutrition as well as using the process of evaluation to improve design.