Download Free Brasseys Mershon American Defense 1996 1997 Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Brasseys Mershon American Defense 1996 1997 and write the review.

A comprehensive, nonpartisan review and analysis of the major issues and trends in American national security policy
The end of the Cold War created a near-euphoria that nations might resort less to military force and that the Doomsday nuclear clock might stop short of midnight. Events soon dashed the higher of these hopes, but the nature of military force and the uses to which it might be put did appear to be changing. In this volume eleven leading scholars apply their particular expertise to understanding what (if anything) has changed and what has not, why the patterns are as they are, and just what the future might bring. Together, the authors address political, moral, and military factors in the decision to use or avoid military force. Case studies of the Gulf War and Bosnia, analyses of the role of women in the armed forces and the role of intelligence agencies, and studies of inter-branch and inter-agency tensions and cooperation inform the various chapters. A strong and thoughtful introduction by H. W. Brands provides the context that ties together the themes and perspectives. Scholars in this distinguished collection include Stephen Biddle, Alexander L. George, J. Bryan Hehir, Andrew Kohut, Andrew Krepinevich, James M. Lindsay, Charles Moskos, Williamson Murray, Bruce Russett, Tony Smith, and Susan L. Woodward. The volume will help scholars, policy makers, and concerned citizens contemplate national alternatives when force threatens.
Årbog. Om amerikansk forsvars- og sikkerhedspolitik, 1995-1996. Fra indholdet: MacGregor Knox: What History can tell us about the "New Strategic Environment". Brian R. Sullivan: American Strategic Policy for an Uncertain Future. Eliot A. Cohen: How to think about Defense Robert W. Gaskin: Crack-up: The Unraveling of American's Military. Andrew F-Krepinewich: The Clinton Defense Strategy. Colin S. Gray: The Second Nuclear Age: Insecurity, Proliferation, and the Control of Arms. Mackubin T. Owens: Strategy and Resources: Trends in the U.S. Defense Budget. John R. Galvin and Jeffrey S. Lantis: Peacekeeping and Power Projection? Conventional Forces for the Twenty-first Century. Lawrence Freedman: Great Powers no more.
... dedicated to the advancement and understanding of those principles and practices, military and political, which serve the vital security interests of the United States.
A comprehensive, nonpartisan review and analysis of the major issues and trends in American national security policy
The Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 is the most important legislation to affecting U.S. national defense in the last 50 years. This act resulted from frustration in Congress and among certain military officers concerning what they believed to be the poor quality of military advice available to civilian decision-makers. It also derived from the U.S. military's perceived inability to conduct successful joint or multi-service operations. The act, passes after four years of legislative debate, designated the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as the principal military advisor to the President and sought to foster greater cooperation among the military services. Goldwater-Nichols marks the latest attempt to balance competing tendencies within the Department of Defense, namely centralization versus decentralization and geographic versus functional distributions of power. As a result of the Goldwater-Nichols Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs has achieved prominence, but his assignment is somewhat contradictory: the spokesman and thus the advocate for the Commander in Chief, while simultaneously the provider of objective advice to the President. While the act did succeed in strengthening the CINCs' authority and in contributing to the dramatic U.S. achievements in the Gulf War, the air and ground campaigns revealed weaknesses in the CINCs' capability to plan joint operations. In addition, the increased role of the military in ad hoc peacekeeping operations has challenged the U.S. military's current organizational structure for the quick deployment of troops from the various services. Rapid technological advances and post-Cold War strategic uncertainty also complicate the U.S. military's organizational structure.