Download Free Assessing Effective Teacher Behaviors In Athletic Training Clinical Education Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online Assessing Effective Teacher Behaviors In Athletic Training Clinical Education and write the review.

"The present study assessed the use of effective teacher behaviors in athletic training clinical education. Research involved development and use of: 1) the 20-question Survey of Effective Clinical Educator Behaviors (SECEB) to assess student and instructor perceptions of clinical instructor use of effective teaching behaviors; and 2) the Observational Record of Clinical Educator Behaviors (ORCEB) interval recording instrument to objectively measure instructor's demonstrated behaviors in the clinical setting. The SECEB was distributed to twelve Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP)-accredited athletic training education programs in the National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) District 3. Subjects (n=186) representing ten of those schools returned usable data. SECEB item statements were grouped into four subcategories of effective teaching behaviors (Information, Evaluation, Critical Thinking, and Physical Presence), and were ranked on a scale from 'Never (1)' to 'Very Often (5)'. While educators rated themselves and their perceived ideal, students evaluated their current and an ideal clinical instructor. Cronbach's alpha for all items showed excellent internal consistency (α=.858). Results found that students (4.56".33) and clinical instructors (4.56".24) had nearly identical perceptions of an ideal instructor's behavior, but that students consistently rated current instructors higher (4.09".52) than the instructors rated themselves (3.93".36). In addition to the survey data, four approved clinical instructors (ACIs) were observed using the ORCEB as they interacted with patients and students for five 30-minute sessions. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities as determined by simple correlation of behavior frequencies between two independent coders were r=.964 and r=.974, respectively. The ORCEB was used to assess clinical instructor demonstration of twelve target behaviors. Results indicate that instructors use only 24% of each clinical education session for teaching/learning behaviors; of the remaining time, 32% was devoted to patient care without student interaction, 35% to behaviors unrelated to clinical education, and 9% in downtime when no students or patients were present. Furthermore, student ranking of these instructors based upon their SECEB scores was identical to that created by ORCEB behavior percentages, indicating that students' perceptions of their instructor's behavior are accurate."--Abstract from author supplied metadata.
ABSTRACT: The investigation was designed to determine athletic training educators (ATEs) instructional effectiveness in the didactic setting. TheATEs instructional effectiveness was assessed through interviews, field observations, and student evaluations. Through a qualitativeresearch methodology, the researcher found athletic training students (ATSs) and ATEs perceived similar instructional techniquesincreased instructional effectiveness. No difference was found between different academic year of ATSs, and perceptions ofinstructional effectiveness. Findings suggested ATEs with a formalized pedagogic focused educational background, have increasedknowledge of instructional effectiveness, and overall had higher student evaluation scores. Considering the future directions of athletictraining, ATEs knowledge and application of effective didactic strategies should be further investigated.
The recent emphasis on the inclusion of behavioral health in professional athletic training education has revealed a gap in the literature relating to how to teach students about this important topic. Utilizing a phenomenological approach, I sought to explore how athletic training preceptors teach professional athletic training students concepts of behavioral health during clinical education. Exploring the current reality and experiences of preceptors relating to behavioral health will help other researchers begin to fill this gap in literature. The following research questions guided this study: (1) what are the experiences of preceptors?; (2) what are the barriers to including students in patient interactions?; and (3) what are the needs of preceptors? Purposive sampling required reaching out to program directors of professional graduate athletic training programs with a request to forward the research invitation to preceptors. Preceptors were interviewed via Zoom using a semi-structured interview guide, recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed following steps specific to a phenomenal approach to research and used evaluative criteria to ensure trustworthiness. Five themes resulted from the analysis: Teaching Methods, Learning Environment, Deciding Factors for Including AT Students, Managing Behavioral Health, and Preceptor Needs. Athletic training preceptors possess the skills to teach students about behavioral health with additional resources, support, and education. The findings suggest that faculty within professional healthcare education programs should re-evaluate their curriculum relative to the role of preceptors focus on teaching behavioral health to ensure they are receiving what they need to educate students effectively.
The dissertation process is one of endurance, willpower, and patience. To simplify the journey for today's graduate students, The Dissertation Desk Reference harvests the components that consistently appear in dissertations, with a separate entry for each component. Each entry includes a comprehensive example taken directly from a high-quality dissertation accompanied by a note describing what the researcher did. This book is user-friendly for doctoral students and their faculty advisors.
Athletic training is an evolving and growing allied health profession. With recent changes in educational degree requirements and standards, many athletic training programs are reviewing current assessments. The AT Milestones project was developed to provide programs with a guide for student assessment within athletic training education programs (ATEPs). While these Milestones have slowly been implemented into select ATEPs, there is currently no published empirical research on the application of the AT Milestones in athletic training education. The purpose of this study was to examine athletic training educators' perceptions of current clinical evaluations, and program evaluations' alignment to the principles of the AT Milestones. The survey had a response rate of 13.2%. Overall, faculty including program directors and clinical coordinators were satisfied or very satisfied with their current clinical evaluations. The majority of respondents reported that they had a general understanding of the AT Milestones (50%). Programs seeking accreditation or in good standing were more likely to have made or are planning to make revisions to clinical evaluations and were more likely to implement the AT Milestones than those programs voluntarily withdrawing. The average AT Milestones Alignment Criteria Score (ATMACS) among the participating institutions was 55%, indicating an average alignment with the AT Milestones. This research seeks to contribute to the limited literature base on clinical assessments in athletic training and serve as a guide for administrators in developing clinical evaluations that best fit the needs of their respective programs.
Analysis of Teaching and Learning in Physical Education presents research-based “best practices” for teaching physical education in order to help pre-service and practicing teachers improve their skills through analysis and reflection. The text begins with an informal analysis of teaching and then quickly moves into systematic strategies for analyzing student and teacher behaviors and interactions. Based on William Anderson’s groundbreaking work, Analysis of Teaching Physical Education (1980), this text is designed to help physical education teachers meet NASPE’s Standards for Advanced Programs in Teacher Education.
The purpose of this study was to explore the role of engagement in clinical education at Kent State University (KSU). A qualitative case study was used to examine preceptors and students perspectives of clinical education experience to answer the following research questions: (1) To what extent are students engaged in their clinical experiences, and if engaged, how do they describe that engagement? and (2) What role(s) does engagement have in athletic training clinical education at KSU? This study used the Social Learning Theory (SLT) as the theoretical framework to understand engagement. Participants were seven preceptors and seven students in KSUs athletic training program (ATP). Data were collection from two interviews and two observations through hand written field notes and audio recordings of interviews during the Fall 2017 semester.Findings revealed engagement in clinical education to be an active learning experience that requires application of knowledge (mental and physical), which occurred through observations, hands-on skills, discussion, and purposeful dialogue. In addition, learning experiences that incorporated complex cognitive processing were considered to have deeper engagement. The preceptor/student relationship was recognized as the factor that had the biggest influence in engagement in clinical education. Lastly, the role of engagement was identified as the application of knowledge to an authentic situation, which acknowledged a connection between didactic and clinical education.The implications of this research highlight the need to develop stronger clinical education experiences, provide preceptor training on teaching, assessment, and evaluation of students, and examination of athletic training clinical education model.