Download Free An Overview Of Takeover Defenses Classic Reprint Book in PDF and EPUB Free Download. You can read online An Overview Of Takeover Defenses Classic Reprint and write the review.

Excerpt from An Overview of Takeover Defenses In summary, takeover resistance motivated by first rationale of hidden values and the second rationale of inducing an auction can benefit target shareholders. However, the managers' natural bias is likely to result in opposition to some takeovers that would benefit target shareholders. The third reason for takeover defenses, managerial self-interest, benefits the stockholders only if resistance happens by chance to be the appropriate action for one of the first two reasons. These three reasons for takeover defenses are not mutually exclusive combinations of the three are often present in defense strategies. For example, managers may use takeover defenses because they prefer friendly, negotiated transactions. This combines elements of the three reasons for takeover defenses. Negotiated acquisitions enable the target managers to share ideas and information with the bidding firm. Consistent with the first and second reasons, this may increase the offer price. It also increases the chances of retaining the target's management team, which is consistent with the third reason. Finally, a negotiated transaction is generally more civilized: to the managers that is like an increase in compensation. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Excerpt from Takeover Defenses and Shareholder Voting Why do shareholders vote for anti-takeover devices which apparently lower the value of their firm? We address this question by constructing an agenda-setting model in which rational, informed, and value-maximizing shareholders vote on requests for such devices made by a self-interested management with employment opportunities outside the firm. We find sufficient conditions for the value of the firm to decline as a result of a request, although it is approved by shareholders. In our model, the apparently paradoxical voting behavior occurs because the expected takeover premium would be reduced more by rejection of the request than by approval, so shareholders rationally choose approval. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Takeover defenses have long been a topic of considerable interest to scholars of finance and corporate law. Yet the significant amount of attention that researchers have lavished on the topic have produced surprisingly little scholarly consensus. This chapter considers a number of major topics related to takeover defenses, including the importance and effects of poison pills and staggered boards, the causes and consequences of firms' varied levels of takeover defenses, the connection between takeover defenses and corporate myopia, and the implications of empty voting for takeover defense law and policy. In doing so, it provides an overview of some of the major results and ongoing debates in this sphere, some of the works driving those debates, and areas that seem likely to receive increased attention in the future.